Institute for Applied Health Research, School of Health & Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Road, Glasgow, Scotland G4 OBA, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 12;13:221. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-221.
Smoking in people with mental health problems (MHPs) is an important public health concern as rates are two to three times higher than in the general population. While a strong evidence base exists to encourage and support smoking cessation in the wider population, there is limited evidence to guide the tailoring of interventions for people with MHPs, including minimal understanding of their needs. This paper presents findings from theoretically-driven formative research which explored the barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation in people with MHPs. The aim, guided by the MRC Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions, was to gather evidence to inform the design and content of smoking cessation interventions for this client group.
Following a review of the empirical and theoretical literature, and taking a critical realist perspective, a qualitative approach was used to gather data from key stakeholders, including people with enduring MHPs (n = 27) and professionals who have regular contact with this client group (n = 54).
There was a strong social norm for smoking in participants with MHPs and most were heavily addicted to nicotine. They acknowledged that their physical health would improve if they stopped smoking and their disposable income would increase; however, more important was the expectation that, if they attempted to stop smoking, their anxiety levels would increase, they would lose an important coping resource, they would have given up something they found pleasurable and, most importantly, their mental health would deteriorate. Barriers to smoking cessation therefore outweighed potential facilitators and, as a consequence, impacted negatively on levels of motivation and self-efficacy. The potential for professionals to encourage cessation attempts was apparent; however, they often failed to raise the issue of smoking/cessation as they believed it would damage their relationship with clients. The professionals' own smoking status also appeared to influence their health promoting role.
Many opportunities to encourage and support smoking cessation in people with MHPs are currently missed. The increased understanding provided by our study findings and literature review have been used to shape recommendations for the content of tailored smoking cessation interventions for this client group.
在精神健康问题(MHP)患者中吸烟是一个重要的公共卫生关注点,因为其吸烟率比一般人群高两到三倍。虽然有大量证据支持在更广泛的人群中鼓励和支持戒烟,但针对 MHP 患者的干预措施的针对性不强,证据有限,包括对他们的需求了解甚少。本文介绍了从理论驱动的形成性研究中得出的发现,该研究探讨了 MHP 患者戒烟的障碍和促进因素。本研究旨在根据 MRC 复杂干预措施的制定和评估框架,收集证据,为针对这一患者群体的戒烟干预措施的设计和内容提供信息。
在审查了实证和理论文献,并采取了批判现实主义观点之后,采用定性方法从主要利益相关者(包括有持久 MHP 的参与者[ n = 27]和经常与这一客户群体接触的专业人员[ n = 54])那里收集数据。
MHP 患者中有强烈的吸烟社会规范,大多数人对尼古丁有很强的依赖性。他们承认如果戒烟,他们的身体健康会改善,可支配收入会增加;然而,更重要的是,如果他们试图戒烟,他们的焦虑水平会上升,他们将失去一个重要的应对资源,他们将放弃一些他们觉得愉快的东西,最重要的是,他们的心理健康会恶化。因此,戒烟的障碍超过了潜在的促进因素,从而对动机和自我效能产生负面影响。专业人员鼓励戒烟尝试的可能性是存在的;然而,他们往往不提出吸烟/戒烟问题,因为他们认为这会损害他们与客户的关系。专业人员自己的吸烟状况似乎也影响了他们的促进健康的角色。
目前有很多机会可以鼓励和支持 MHP 患者戒烟,但这些机会都被错过了。我们的研究结果和文献综述提供了更多的理解,这些理解已被用于为针对这一患者群体的定制戒烟干预措施的内容提供建议。