Trainor Katie, Leavey Gerard
Department of Health and Life Sciences, University of Ulster, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Coleraine, UK;
The Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Ulster Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Coleraine, UK.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Jan;19(1):14-23. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw183. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
People with severe mental illness (PWSMI) die 15-20 years earlier than people in the general population and this is often due to preventable smoking-related health conditions. Studies that identify barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation are crucial for policy makers and health care professionals.
This appraisal aims to identify and critically appraise qualitative studies which explore smoking experiences and barriers to smoking cessation among PWSMI.
Articles were retrieved from electronic health related databases including Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Sage, Biomed, Medline, Embase, and electronic hand searches of bibliographies from key articles.
Eleven papers were identified. Although the overall quality of studies were sufficient, most had limited information relating to trustworthiness and sociodemographic details. Cost savings and health benefits were frequently cited as facilitators to quitting, however may be of limited impact as smoking for existential purposes, social inclusion, and mental health management appear to be considered highly important among PWSMI.
Findings were restricted to predominantly individual barriers to smoking cessation which may be more resistant to change as service users rely on smoking to manage their mental health and smoking is embedded in the culture of mental health settings.
This critical appraisal identifies qualitative evidence regarding which factors facilitate or prevent individuals with severe mental illness from engaging with smoking cessation. Healthcare professionals and policy makers should address external barriers to quitting smoking as this may increase participation in intervention studies, inform policy and assist in the development of a feasible and acceptable smoking cessation intervention among PWSMI. Methodological considerations highlight that future research should include sociodemographic and contextual factors to improve utility and applicability of findings.
患有严重精神疾病的人(PWSMI)比普通人群早15 - 20年死亡,这通常归因于与吸烟相关的可预防健康状况。识别戒烟的障碍和促进因素的研究对政策制定者和医疗保健专业人员至关重要。
本评估旨在识别并批判性评价探索PWSMI吸烟经历及戒烟障碍的定性研究。
从包括科学网、Scopus、PubMed、Sage、生物医学、医学索引、Embase等电子健康相关数据库以及对关键文章参考文献的电子手工检索中获取文章。
共识别出11篇论文。尽管研究的整体质量足够,但大多数论文关于可信度和社会人口学细节的信息有限。成本节约和健康益处常被引述为戒烟的促进因素,然而其影响可能有限,因为出于生存目的、社会融入和心理健康管理而吸烟在PWSMI中似乎被视为非常重要。
研究结果主要局限于戒烟的个体障碍,由于服务使用者依赖吸烟来管理其心理健康且吸烟已融入心理健康环境文化中,这些障碍可能更难改变。
本批判性评价识别了关于哪些因素促进或阻碍严重精神疾病患者戒烟的定性证据。医疗保健专业人员和政策制定者应解决戒烟的外部障碍,因为这可能增加参与干预研究的人数,为政策提供信息并有助于制定PWSMI可行且可接受的戒烟干预措施。方法学考量强调,未来研究应纳入社会人口学和背景因素,以提高研究结果的实用性和适用性。