Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;27(1):214-22. doi: 10.1037/a0031380.
Despite major advances and success in finding effective interventions for problematic drinking among college students, personalized feedback interventions (PFIs) continue to include a range of components that vary widely across intervention trials. To facilitate research regarding which feedback components may be most effective, the present research provides preliminary evidence regarding student perceptions of and preferences for different types of feedback components. Undergraduate student drinkers (n = 397, 41% male) rated their affinity for and skepticism of 14 feedback components and identified the feedback components that they most preferred. The majority of students preferred information regarding descriptive normative comparisons and the practical costs of drinking, whereas few reported a desire to learn behavioral strategies to limit risk or didactic information. High-risk drinkers (n = 228) reported lower ratings for all feedback components than did low-risk drinkers, and men (n = 162, 41%) provided significantly lower ratings for all feedback components than did women. This is the first study to document student preferences for the different feedback components included in PFIs. The current study generates hypotheses regarding components that may increase the efficacy of current feedback interventions for high-risk drinking.
尽管在为大学生的问题性饮酒寻找有效干预措施方面取得了重大进展和成功，但个性化反馈干预（PFIs）仍然包括各种干预试验中差异很大的一系列组成部分。为了促进有关哪些反馈成分可能最有效的研究，本研究提供了有关学生对不同类型反馈成分的看法和偏好的初步证据。本科生饮酒者（n = 397，41%为男性）对 14 种反馈成分的亲和力和怀疑度进行了评分，并确定了他们最偏好的反馈成分。大多数学生更喜欢关于描述性规范比较和饮酒实际成本的信息，而很少有人表示希望学习限制风险的行为策略或说教信息。高风险饮酒者（n = 228）对所有反馈成分的评分均低于低风险饮酒者，男性（n = 162，41%）对所有反馈成分的评分均低于女性。这是第一项记录学生对 PFIs 中包含的不同反馈成分的偏好的研究。本研究提出了关于可能提高当前针对高风险饮酒的反馈干预效果的成分的假设。
