Ohta Ken, Jean Bousquet Philippe, Akiyama Kazuo, Adachi Mitsuru, Ichinose Masakazu, Ebisawa Motohiro, Tamura Gen, Nagai Atsushi, Nishima Sankei, Fukuda Takeshi, Morikawa Akihiro, Okamoto Yoshitaka, Kohno Yoichi, Saito Hirohisa, Takenaka Hiroshi, Grouse Larry, Bousquet Jean
National Hospital Organization, Tokyo National Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
J Asthma. 2013 Jun;50(5):514-21. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.786726. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
The assessment of asthma control is pivotal to treatment decisions. A questionnaire that assesses the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)-defined control requires four questions. A visual analog scale (VAS) to evaluate asthma control can be simply marked, but its correlation with GINA-defined control has been insufficiently evaluated. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether VAS levels can predict GINA-defined asthma control with particular emphasis on the distinctions between "partly controlled" and "uncontrolled" and between "partly controlled" and "controlled" asthma,
A cross-sectional multicenter study was carried out throughout Japan (SACRA) from March to August 2009 among patients with a diagnosis and treatment of asthma. Asthma control was studied using the GINA questionnaire and a VAS measurement of asthma severity. Pulmonary function testing was not carried out,
1910 physicians enrolled 29,518 patients with asthma. 15,051 (51.0%) questionnaires were administered by physicians; patients filled out 14,076 (47.7%) questionnaires themselves. 28,225 (95.6%) of the patients were evaluable. VAS measurement of asthma symptoms was useful in predicting levels of GINA-defined control categories (the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.704 to 0.837). Patients with "controlled," "partly controlled," and "uncontrolled" asthma were discriminated by VAS levels (1.50, 4.79, and 7.19). Similar results have been obtained with self- and physician-administered questionnaires showing the validity of results.
Measurement of VAS levels is able to discriminate between patients with "controlled," "partly controlled," and "uncontrolled" asthma. The VAS score could be a simple guide in clinical situations requiring daily or regular evaluation of asthma control.
哮喘控制的评估对于治疗决策至关重要。一份评估全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)定义的控制情况的问卷需要四个问题。用于评估哮喘控制的视觉模拟量表(VAS)标记简单,但它与GINA定义的控制之间的相关性尚未得到充分评估。本研究的目的是评估VAS水平能否预测GINA定义的哮喘控制情况,尤其侧重于“部分控制”与“未控制”以及“部分控制”与“控制良好”哮喘之间的区别。
2009年3月至8月在日本全国范围内开展了一项横断面多中心研究(SACRA),研究对象为已诊断并正在接受哮喘治疗的患者。使用GINA问卷和哮喘严重程度的VAS测量来研究哮喘控制情况。未进行肺功能测试。
1910名医生纳入了29518例哮喘患者。医生发放了15051份(51.0%)问卷;患者自行填写了14076份(47.7%)问卷。28225例(95.6%)患者可进行评估。哮喘症状的VAS测量有助于预测GINA定义的控制类别水平(受试者操作特征曲线下面积在0.704至0.837之间)。“控制良好”、“部分控制”和“未控制”哮喘患者可通过VAS水平进行区分(分别为1.50、4.79和7.19)。自行填写问卷和医生发放问卷均得到了类似结果,表明结果有效。
VAS水平测量能够区分“控制良好”、“部分控制”和“未控制”哮喘患者。在需要每日或定期评估哮喘控制情况的临床场景中,VAS评分可能是一个简单的指导工具。