Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Nutr Cancer. 2013;65(3):345-54. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2013.767364.
The relative importance of biochemical pathways has not been previously examined when considering the influence of diet on breast cancer risk. To address this issue, we used interview data from a population-based sample of 1463 breast cancer cases and 1500 controls. Dietary intake was assessed shortly after diagnosis using a 101-item food frequency questionnaire. Age- and energy-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for individual micro- and macronutrients were estimated with logistic regression. Hierarchical modeling was used to account for biologically plausible nutrient pathways (1-carbon metabolism, oxidative stress, glycemic control, and phytoestrogens). Effect estimates from hierarchical modeling were more precise and plausible compared to those from multivariable models. The strongest relationship observed was for the glycemic control pathway, but confidence intervals (CI) were wide [OR (95% CI): 0.86 (0.62, 1.21)]. Little or no effect was observed for the 1-carbon metabolism, oxidative stress, and phytoestrogen pathways. Associations were similar when stratified by supplement use. Our approach that emphasizes biochemical pathways, rather than individual nutrients, revealed that breast cancer risk may be more strongly associated with glycemic control factors than those from other pathways considered. Our study emphasizes the importance of accounting for multiple nutrient pathways when examining associations between dietary intake and breast cancer.
当考虑饮食对乳腺癌风险的影响时,以前没有检查过生化途径的相对重要性。为了解决这个问题,我们使用了基于人群的 1463 例乳腺癌病例和 1500 例对照的访谈数据。在诊断后不久,使用 101 项食物频率问卷评估了饮食摄入。使用逻辑回归估计了个别微量和常量营养素的年龄和能量调整后的优势比(OR)。分层模型用于解释合理的营养途径(1 碳代谢、氧化应激、血糖控制和植物雌激素)。与多变量模型相比,分层模型的效应估计更准确和合理。观察到的最强关系是血糖控制途径,但置信区间(CI)较宽[OR(95%CI):0.86(0.62,1.21)]。1 碳代谢、氧化应激和植物雌激素途径的影响很小或没有。分层考虑补充剂使用时,关联相似。我们强调生化途径而不是个别营养素的方法表明,乳腺癌风险可能与血糖控制因素的关联比其他考虑的途径更强。我们的研究强调了在检查饮食摄入与乳腺癌之间的关联时,考虑多种营养途径的重要性。