Sutter Edward G, Wall Simon J, Mears Simon C, Belkoff Stephen M
International Center for Orthopaedic Advancement, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2010 Sep;1(1):22-6. doi: 10.1177/2151458510378406.
Femoroplasty, the augmentation of the proximal femur, has been shown in biomechanical studies to increase the energy required to produce a fracture and therefore may reduce the risk of such injuries. The purpose of our study was to test the hypotheses that: (1) 15 mL of cement was sufficient to mechanically augment the proximal femur, (2) there was no difference in augmentation effect between cement placement in the intertrochanteric region and in the femoral neck, and (3) cement placement in the femoral neck would predispose the proximal femur to an intertrochanteric fracture, whereas trochanteric placement would result in subtrochanteric fractures. In each of 18 pairs of osteoporotic human cadaveric femora, 15 mL of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement was injected into the trochanteric or femoral neck region of 1 femur, and the noninjected femur was used as the control. The augmentation effect of femoroplasty was evaluated under simulated fall conditions using a materials testing machine. Multiple linear regressions incorporating random effects were used to check for associations between covariates (bone mineral density, cement location, and treatment) and the parameters of interest (stiffness, yield energy, yield load, ultimate load, and ultimate energy). Significance was set at P < .05. It was found that femoroplasty with 15 mL of cement did not significantly increase stiffness, yield energy, yield load, ultimate load, or ultimate energy relative to paired controls. There were no significant differences in parameters of interest or fracture patterns in specimens augmented in the femoral neck versus the trochanter. It was concluded that 15 mL of cement was not sufficient to augment the proximal femur and that there was no biomechanical advantage to the placement of cement within the femoral neck versus the trochanter.
股骨成形术,即近端股骨增强术,生物力学研究表明其可增加造成骨折所需的能量,因此可能降低此类损伤的风险。我们研究的目的是检验以下假设:(1)15毫升骨水泥足以在力学上增强近端股骨;(2)在转子间区域和股骨颈植入骨水泥的增强效果无差异;(3)在股骨颈植入骨水泥会使近端股骨易发生转子间骨折,而在转子区植入则会导致转子下骨折。在18对骨质疏松的人体尸体股骨中,向其中1根股骨的转子区或股骨颈区域注入15毫升聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥,未注入骨水泥的股骨作为对照。使用材料试验机在模拟跌倒条件下评估股骨成形术的增强效果。采用纳入随机效应的多元线性回归来检验协变量(骨密度、骨水泥位置和治疗)与感兴趣参数(刚度、屈服能量、屈服载荷、极限载荷和极限能量)之间的关联。显著性设定为P < 0.05。结果发现,与配对对照相比,注入15毫升骨水泥的股骨成形术并未显著增加刚度、屈服能量、屈服载荷、极限载荷或极限能量。在股骨颈与转子区增强的标本中,感兴趣参数或骨折模式没有显著差异。得出的结论是,15毫升骨水泥不足以增强近端股骨,并且在股骨颈与转子区植入骨水泥在生物力学上没有优势。