Suppr超能文献

C 反应蛋白的时间变异性:对临床风险分层的影响。

Time variability of C-reactive protein: implications for clinical risk stratification.

机构信息

Quebec Heart and Lung Institute, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Apr 8;8(4):e60759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060759. Print 2013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

C-reactive protein (CRP) is proposed as a screening test for predicting risk and guiding preventive approaches in coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the stability of repeated CRP measurements over time in subjects with and without CAD is not well defined. We sought to determine the stability of serial CRP measurements in stable subjects with distinct CAD manifestations and a group without CAD while carefully controlling for known confounders.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 4 groups of 25 stable subjects each 1) a history of recurrent acute coronary events; 2) a single myocardial infarction ≥7 years ago; 3) longstanding CAD (≥7 years) that had never been unstable; 4) no CAD. Fifteen measurements of CRP were obtained to cover 21 time-points: 3 times during one day; 5 consecutive days; 4 consecutive weeks; 4 consecutive months; and every 3 months over the year. CRP risk threshold was set at 2.0 mg/L. We estimated variance across time-points using standard descriptive statistics and Bayesian hierarchical models.

RESULTS

Median CRP values of the 4 groups and their pattern of variability did not differ substantially so all subjects were analyzed together. The median individual standard deviation (SD) CRP values within-day, within-week, between-weeks and between-months were 0.07, 0.19, 0.36 and 0.63 mg/L, respectively. Forty-six percent of subjects changed CRP risk category at least once and 21% had ≥4 weekly and monthly CRP values in both low and high-risk categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering its large intra-individual variability, it may be problematic to rely on CRP values for CAD risk prediction and therapeutic decision-making in individual subjects.

摘要

背景

C 反应蛋白(CRP)被提议作为一种筛查试验,用于预测冠心病(CAD)的风险并指导预防方法。然而,在 CAD 患者和非 CAD 患者中,CRP 的重复测量值随时间的稳定性尚未明确。我们旨在确定具有不同 CAD 表现的稳定患者和无 CAD 患者的 CRP 连续测量值的稳定性,同时仔细控制已知的混杂因素。

方法

我们前瞻性研究了 4 组各 25 例稳定患者,分别为:1)复发性急性冠状动脉事件史;2)7 年前发生过一次心肌梗死;3)长期 CAD(≥7 年)从未不稳定;4)无 CAD。共进行了 15 次 CRP 测量,覆盖了 21 个时间点:1 天内 3 次;连续 5 天;连续 4 周;连续 4 个月;每年每 3 个月。将 CRP 风险阈值设定为 2.0mg/L。我们使用标准描述性统计和贝叶斯层次模型来估计各时间点的方差。

结果

4 组的中位数 CRP 值及其变异模式差异不大,因此所有患者均一起进行分析。日内、周内、周间和月间个体 CRP 值的中位数个体标准差(SD)分别为 0.07、0.19、0.36 和 0.63mg/L。46%的患者至少改变了一次 CRP 风险类别,21%的患者至少有 4 次每周和每月 CRP 值处于低危和高危类别。

结论

鉴于其较大的个体内变异性,可能难以依靠 CRP 值进行 CAD 风险预测和个体治疗决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c45f/3620269/106a4e595b9a/pone.0060759.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验