Bluebond-Langner Myra, Beecham Emma, Candy Bridget, Langner Richard, Jones Louise
Louis Dundas Centre for Children's Palliative Care, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Palliat Med. 2013 Sep;27(8):705-13. doi: 10.1177/0269216313483186. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
Home is often cited as preferred place of death in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. This position, however, usually relies on data concerning adults and not evidence about children. The latter data are scant, primarily retrospective and from parents.
To review the literature on preference for place of death for children and young people with life-limiting or life-threatening illnesses.
The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched from 2004 to 2012, as well as bibliography, key author and grey literature searches. Policy documents, empirical, theoretical and peer-reviewed studies and conference abstracts were included. Articles were assessed for study quality.
Nine studies were included from five countries. Six reported a majority of parents (only one study interviewed adolescents) expressing preference for death at home. Other studies differed significantly in their findings; one reporting 35.1% and another 0% preferring death at home. Some parents did not express a preference. Six of the studies included only parents of children who died from cancer while being treated at tertiary centres that offered palliative care services. Such results cannot be generalised to the population of all life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses. Furthermore, the methods of the studies reviewed failed to accommodate the full range and dynamic character of preference.
The evidence base for current policies that stress the need to increase home death rates for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions is inadequate. Further rigorous research should collect data from parents, children and siblings.
在英国及其他地区,家常常被视为首选的死亡地点。然而,这一观点通常基于成人数据,而非有关儿童的证据。后者的数据匮乏,主要是回顾性的且来自父母。
回顾关于患有危及生命或生命受限疾病的儿童和青少年对死亡地点偏好的文献。
检索了2004年至2012年的MEDLINE、CINAHL和EMBASE数据库,以及参考文献、关键作者和灰色文献检索。纳入了政策文件、实证研究、理论研究、同行评审研究和会议摘要。对文章进行了研究质量评估。
纳入了来自五个国家的九项研究。六项研究报告称,大多数父母(只有一项研究采访了青少年)表示倾向于在家中死亡。其他研究的结果差异显著;一项研究报告称35.1%的人倾向于在家中死亡,另一项则为0%。一些父母没有表达偏好。其中六项研究仅纳入了在提供姑息治疗服务的三级中心接受治疗时死于癌症的儿童的父母。这样的结果不能推广到所有患有危及生命和生命受限疾病的人群。此外,所审查研究的方法未能涵盖偏好的全部范围和动态特征。
当前强调需要提高患有危及生命和生命受限疾病的儿童和青少年在家中死亡比例的政策的证据基础不充分。进一步的严谨研究应收集来自父母、儿童和兄弟姐妹的数据。