• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有危及生命和生命受限疾病的儿童和青少年的首选死亡地点:文献系统综述及对未来研究和政策的建议

Preferred place of death for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a systematic review of the literature and recommendations for future inquiry and policy.

作者信息

Bluebond-Langner Myra, Beecham Emma, Candy Bridget, Langner Richard, Jones Louise

机构信息

Louis Dundas Centre for Children's Palliative Care, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2013 Sep;27(8):705-13. doi: 10.1177/0269216313483186. Epub 2013 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1177/0269216313483186
PMID:23612958
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3808113/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Home is often cited as preferred place of death in the United Kingdom and elsewhere. This position, however, usually relies on data concerning adults and not evidence about children. The latter data are scant, primarily retrospective and from parents.

AIM

To review the literature on preference for place of death for children and young people with life-limiting or life-threatening illnesses.

DESIGN AND DATA SOURCES

The databases MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched from 2004 to 2012, as well as bibliography, key author and grey literature searches. Policy documents, empirical, theoretical and peer-reviewed studies and conference abstracts were included. Articles were assessed for study quality.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included from five countries. Six reported a majority of parents (only one study interviewed adolescents) expressing preference for death at home. Other studies differed significantly in their findings; one reporting 35.1% and another 0% preferring death at home. Some parents did not express a preference. Six of the studies included only parents of children who died from cancer while being treated at tertiary centres that offered palliative care services. Such results cannot be generalised to the population of all life-limiting and life-threatening illnesses. Furthermore, the methods of the studies reviewed failed to accommodate the full range and dynamic character of preference.

CONCLUSION

The evidence base for current policies that stress the need to increase home death rates for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions is inadequate. Further rigorous research should collect data from parents, children and siblings.

摘要

背景

在英国及其他地区,家常常被视为首选的死亡地点。然而,这一观点通常基于成人数据,而非有关儿童的证据。后者的数据匮乏,主要是回顾性的且来自父母。

目的

回顾关于患有危及生命或生命受限疾病的儿童和青少年对死亡地点偏好的文献。

设计与数据来源

检索了2004年至2012年的MEDLINE、CINAHL和EMBASE数据库,以及参考文献、关键作者和灰色文献检索。纳入了政策文件、实证研究、理论研究、同行评审研究和会议摘要。对文章进行了研究质量评估。

结果

纳入了来自五个国家的九项研究。六项研究报告称,大多数父母(只有一项研究采访了青少年)表示倾向于在家中死亡。其他研究的结果差异显著;一项研究报告称35.1%的人倾向于在家中死亡,另一项则为0%。一些父母没有表达偏好。其中六项研究仅纳入了在提供姑息治疗服务的三级中心接受治疗时死于癌症的儿童的父母。这样的结果不能推广到所有患有危及生命和生命受限疾病的人群。此外,所审查研究的方法未能涵盖偏好的全部范围和动态特征。

结论

当前强调需要提高患有危及生命和生命受限疾病的儿童和青少年在家中死亡比例的政策的证据基础不充分。进一步的严谨研究应收集来自父母、儿童和兄弟姐妹的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87f5/3808113/b81ade6da836/10.1177_0269216313483186-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87f5/3808113/b81ade6da836/10.1177_0269216313483186-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/87f5/3808113/b81ade6da836/10.1177_0269216313483186-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Preferred place of death for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a systematic review of the literature and recommendations for future inquiry and policy.患有危及生命和生命受限疾病的儿童和青少年的首选死亡地点:文献系统综述及对未来研究和政策的建议
Palliat Med. 2013 Sep;27(8):705-13. doi: 10.1177/0269216313483186. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Participation in environmental enhancement and conservation activities for health and well-being in adults: a review of quantitative and qualitative evidence.成年人参与促进环境改善和保护活动对健康与福祉的影响:定量和定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 21;2016(5):CD010351. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010351.pub2.
6
Parent training interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years.针对5至18岁儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003018.pub3.
7
Family-centred care for hospitalised children aged 0-12 years.以家庭为中心的0至12岁住院儿童护理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD004811. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004811.pub3.
8
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
The effectiveness of interventions to treat severe acute malnutrition in young children: a systematic review.干预措施治疗幼儿严重急性营养不良的效果:系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(19):1-316. doi: 10.3310/hta16190.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring success in sub-acute hospital-to-home transitions for palliative patients: a descriptive qualitative study.探索姑息治疗患者亚急性医院至家庭过渡阶段的成功经验:一项描述性定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 7;24(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01830-2.
2
Between Home and Hospital: Is There an Optimal Location of Death for the Dying Child?在家与医院之间:对于濒死儿童而言,是否存在最佳的死亡地点?
Acta Paediatr. 2025 Oct;114(10):2499-2502. doi: 10.1111/apa.70210. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
3
Decision-making regarding place of end-of-life care for children with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: a systematic integrative review.

本文引用的文献

1
Opinions of patients with cancer on the relative importance of place of death in the context of a 'good death'.癌症患者对于在“善终”背景下死亡地点的相对重要性的看法。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2011 Dec;1(3):310-4. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000041. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
2
Rising national prevalence of life-limiting conditions in children in England.英格兰儿童患有危及生命疾病的比例不断上升。
Pediatrics. 2012 Apr;129(4):e923-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2846. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
3
Symptoms and suffering at the end of life in children with cancer: an Australian perspective.
关于患有危及生命和生命受限疾病儿童的临终关怀地点的决策:一项系统综合综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jan 27;24(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01661-1.
4
Harnessing Natural Language Processing to Assess Quality of End-of-Life Care for Children With Cancer.利用自然语言处理评估癌症儿童临终关怀质量。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Sep;8:e2400134. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00134.
5
Programmatic Palliative Care Consultations in Pediatric Heart Transplant Evaluations.儿科心脏移植评估中的计划性姑息治疗咨询。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2024 Jun;45(5):1064-1071. doi: 10.1007/s00246-024-03422-y. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
6
EOLinPLACE: an international research project to reform the way dying places are classified and understood.EOLinPLACE:一项旨在改革临终场所分类和理解方式的国际研究项目。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024 Feb 12;18:26323524231222498. doi: 10.1177/26323524231222498. eCollection 2024.
7
Children with cancer at the end of life in a middle-income country: integrated pediatric palliative care improves outcomes.发展中国家终末期癌症患儿:综合性儿科姑息治疗可改善结局。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 2;23(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01354-1.
8
Palliative care for children with central nervous system tumors: results of a Spanish multicenter study.中枢神经系统肿瘤患儿的姑息治疗:一项西班牙多中心研究的结果。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2024 Mar;26(3):786-795. doi: 10.1007/s12094-023-03301-7. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
9
Location of death among children with life-threatening conditions: a national population-based observational study using the Canadian Vital Statistics Database (2008-2014).致命疾病儿童的死亡地点:利用加拿大生命统计数据库的全国人口观察性研究(2008-2014 年)。
CMAJ Open. 2023 Apr 4;11(2):E298-E304. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220070. Print 2023 Mar-Apr.
10
Preferences about place of end-of-life care and death of patients with life-threatening illnesses and their families: a protocol for an umbrella review.危及生命的疾病患者及其家属对临终关怀地点和死亡的偏好:伞式综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 29;13(3):e066374. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066374.
癌症患儿生命末期的症状和痛苦:澳大利亚的观点。
Med J Aust. 2010 Jan 18;192(2):71-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2010.tb03420.x.
4
Gender imbalance in pediatric palliative care research samples.儿科姑息治疗研究样本中的性别失衡。
Palliat Med. 2010 Jun;24(4):435-44. doi: 10.1177/0269216309354396. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
5
Impact of a pediatric palliative care program.儿科姑息治疗方案的影响。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010 Feb;54(2):279-83. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22272.
6
Research in pediatric palliative care: closing the gap between what is and is not known.儿科姑息治疗研究:弥合已知与未知之间的差距。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2009 Oct-Nov;26(5):392-8. doi: 10.1177/1049909109345147. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
7
'A bed in the middle of nowhere': parents' meanings of place of death for adults with cystic fibrosis.“荒郊野岭中的一张床”:父母对于成年囊性纤维化患者死亡地点的理解
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Oct;69(7):1056-62. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
8
Place of death of adolescents and young adults with cancer: first study in a French population.癌症青少年及青年患者的死亡地点:法国人群的首次研究
Palliat Support Care. 2009 Mar;7(1):27-35. doi: 10.1017/S1478951509000054.
9
A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews.一种用于评估混合方法研究的评分系统,同时也用于在混合研究综述中评估定性、定量和混合方法的原始研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Apr;46(4):529-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
10
What accounts for differences or disparities in pediatric palliative and end-of-life care? A systematic review focusing on possible multilevel mechanisms.儿童姑息治疗和临终关怀中的差异或差距是由什么造成的?一项聚焦于可能的多层次机制的系统综述。
Pediatrics. 2008 Sep;122(3):574-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3042.