• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速反应团队:对其有效性的定性分析。

Rapid response teams: qualitative analysis of their effectiveness.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6917, USA.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2013 May;22(3):198-210. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2013990.

DOI:10.4037/ajcc2013990
PMID:23635929
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary rapid response teams focus on patients' emergent needs and manage critical situations to prevent avoidable deaths. Although research has focused primarily on outcomes, studies of the actual team effectiveness within the teams from multiple perspectives have been limited.

OBJECTIVE

To describe effectiveness of rapid response teams in a large teaching hospital in California that had been using such teams for 5 years.

METHODS

The grounded-theory method was used to discover if substantive theory might emerge from interview and/or observational data. Purposeful sampling was used to conduct in-person semistructured interviews with 17 key informants. Convenience sampling was used for the 9 observed events that involved a rapid response team. Analysis involved use of a concept or indicator model to generate empirical results from the data. Data were coded, compared, and contrasted, and, when appropriate, relationships between concepts were formed. Results Dimensions of effective team performance included the concepts of organizational culture, team structure, expertise, communication, and teamwork.

CONCLUSIONS

Professionals involved reported that rapid response teams functioned well in managing patients at risk or in crisis; however, unique challenges were identified. Teams were loosely coupled because of the inconsistency of team members from day to day. Team members had little opportunity to develop relationships or team skills. The need for team training may be greater than that among teams that work together regularly under less time pressure to perform. Communication between team members and managing a crisis were critical aspects of an effective response team.

摘要

背景

多学科快速反应团队专注于患者的紧急需求,并管理危急情况,以防止可避免的死亡。尽管研究主要集中在结果上,但从多个角度研究团队内部的实际团队有效性的研究有限。

目的

描述加利福尼亚州一家大型教学医院的快速反应团队的有效性,该医院已经使用此类团队 5 年。

方法

采用扎根理论方法来发现访谈和/或观察数据是否可能产生实质性理论。采用目的性抽样对 17 名关键信息员进行了面对面的半结构式访谈。方便抽样用于涉及快速反应团队的 9 次观察事件。分析涉及使用概念或指标模型从数据中生成经验结果。对数据进行编码、比较和对比,并在适当情况下形成概念之间的关系。结果有效团队绩效的维度包括组织文化、团队结构、专业知识、沟通和团队合作的概念。

结论

参与的专业人员报告说,快速反应团队在管理有风险或处于危机中的患者方面运作良好;然而,也确定了独特的挑战。由于团队成员每天的不一致性,团队松散耦合。团队成员几乎没有机会发展关系或团队技能。团队培训的需求可能大于在压力下定期共同工作以执行任务的团队。团队成员之间的沟通和管理危机是有效反应团队的关键方面。

相似文献

1
Rapid response teams: qualitative analysis of their effectiveness.快速反应团队:对其有效性的定性分析。
Am J Crit Care. 2013 May;22(3):198-210. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2013990.
2
The culture of a trauma team in relation to human factors.创伤团队与人为因素相关的文化。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Oct;15(10):1257-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01566.x.
3
Perceptions of interprofessional teamwork in low-acuity settings: a qualitative analysis.低危环境下的跨专业团队合作认知:定性分析。
Med Educ. 2014 Jun;48(6):583-92. doi: 10.1111/medu.12424.
4
Rapid response teams seen through the eyes of the nurse.护士眼中的快速反应团队。
Am J Nurs. 2010 Jun;110(6):28-34; quiz 35-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000377686.64479.84.
5
Observed and self-perceived teamwork in a rapid response team.快速反应团队中观察到的和自我感知到的团队合作
J Nurses Staff Dev. 2012 Jul;28(4):191-7. doi: 10.1097/NND.0b013e31825e63d7.
6
A typology for health care teams.医疗团队的分类法。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2010 Oct-Dec;35(4):345-54. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181e9fceb.
7
Coordination patterns related to high clinical performance in a simulated anesthetic crisis.与模拟麻醉危机中的高临床绩效相关的协调模式
Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1606-15. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181981d36.
8
Nurses' perceptions of simulation-based interprofessional training program for rapid response and code blue events.护士对基于模拟的跨专业快速反应和急救培训项目的看法。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2012 Jan-Mar;27(1):43-50. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e3182303c95.
9
Impact of clinical leadership development on the clinical leader, nursing team and care-giving process: a case study.临床领导力发展对临床领导者、护理团队及护理过程的影响:一项案例研究
J Nurs Manag. 2008 Sep;16(6):753-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00930.x.
10
How to manage organisational change and create practice teams: experiences of a South African primary care health centre.如何管理组织变革并创建实践团队:一家南非初级保健健康中心的经验
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2008 Jul;21(2):132. Epub 2008 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a novel rapid response event review process for quality improvement.开发一种新的快速反应事件审查流程,以进行质量改进。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 10;13(2):e002664. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002664.
2
Qualitative investigation of military surgical resuscitation teams: what are the drivers of success of a rapid response team?军事外科复苏小组的定性研究:快速反应小组成功的驱动因素是什么?
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 23;14(3):e076000. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076000.
3
How Personality and Communication Patterns Affect Online Teams Under Pressure.
个性与沟通模式如何在压力下影响线上团队。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 May 27;5:818491. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.818491. eCollection 2022.
4
Community implementation of the 3 Wishes Project: an observational study of a compassionate end-of-life care initiative for critically ill patients.社区实施 3 个愿望项目:对重病患者临终关怀计划的观察性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Jul 20;9(3):E757-E764. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200273. Print 2021 Jul-Sep.
5
Sensemaking in the formation of basic life support teams - a proof-of-concept, qualitative study of simulated in-hospital cardiac arrests.基本生命支持团队组建中的意义建构——一项模拟院内心搏骤停的概念验证、定性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 29;26(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0479-0.
6
Referrral Systems Development and Survey of Perioperative and Critical Care Referral to Anesthetists.转诊系统的开发以及围手术期和重症监护向麻醉医生转诊的调查。
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):702-712. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.207072.
7
A stochastic model of acute-care decisions based on patient and provider heterogeneity.基于患者和提供者异质性的急性护理决策的随机模型。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2017 Jun;20(2):187-206. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9347-x. Epub 2015 Oct 21.