Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jul;51(7):2172-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00548-13. Epub 2013 May 1.
A number of diagnostic tests are available for dengue virus (DENV) detection, including a variety of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). However, reports describing a direct comparison of different NAATs have been limited. In this study, we report the design of an internally controlled real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) that detects all four DENV serotypes but does not distinguish between them (the pan-DENV assay). Two hundred clinical samples were then tested using four different DENV RT-PCR assays: the pan-DENV assay, a commercially produced, internally controlled DENV rRT-PCR (the Altona assay), a widely used heminested RT-PCR, and a serotype-specific multiplex rRT-PCR assay. The pan-DENV assay had a linear range extending from 1.0 to 7.0 log10 cDNA equivalents/μl and a lower limit of 95% detection ranging from 1.7 to 7.6 cDNA equivalents/μl, depending on the serotype. When measured against a composite reference standard, the pan-DENV assay proved to be more clinically sensitive than either the Altona or heminested assays, with a sensitivity of 98.0% compared to 72.3% and 78.8%, respectively (P ≤ 0.0001 for both comparisons). The pan-DENV assay detected DENV in significantly more samples collected on or after day 5 of illness and in a subgroup of patients with detectable anti-DENV IgM at presentation. No significant difference in sensitivity was observed between the pan-DENV assay and the multiplex rRT-PCR, despite the presence of an internal control in the former. The detection of DENV RNA late in the course of clinical illness should serve to lengthen the period during which a confirmed molecular diagnosis of DENV infection can be provided.
有许多诊断检测可用于登革热病毒 (DENV) 的检测,包括各种核酸扩增检测 (NAATs)。然而,关于不同 NAAT 直接比较的报告一直有限。在这项研究中,我们报告了一种内部对照实时逆转录 PCR (rRT-PCR) 的设计,该检测可以检测到所有四种 DENV 血清型,但不能区分它们(泛 DENV 检测)。然后,使用四种不同的 DENV RT-PCR 检测方法对 200 个临床样本进行了检测:泛 DENV 检测、商业化生产的内部对照 DENV rRT-PCR(Altona 检测)、广泛使用的半巢式 RT-PCR 和血清型特异性多重 rRT-PCR 检测。泛 DENV 检测的线性范围从 1.0 到 7.0 log10 cDNA 当量/μl 不等,95%检测下限从 1.7 到 7.6 cDNA 当量/μl 不等,具体取决于血清型。当与复合参考标准进行比较时,泛 DENV 检测的临床敏感性明显高于 Altona 或半巢式检测,敏感性分别为 98.0%、72.3%和 78.8%(两者比较均 P≤0.0001)。泛 DENV 检测在疾病发作后第 5 天或更晚采集的样本以及在就诊时可检测到抗 DENV IgM 的患者亚组中检测到 DENV 的频率更高。尽管在前者中存在内部对照,但在泛 DENV 检测和多重 rRT-PCR 之间未观察到敏感性的显著差异。在临床疾病过程中晚期检测到 DENV RNA 应能延长提供 DENV 感染确认分子诊断的时间。