Suppr超能文献

建立一种内对照实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测方法用于泛 dengue 病毒检测,并比较四种分子 dengue 病毒检测方法。

Development of an internally controlled real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay for pan-dengue virus detection and comparison of four molecular dengue virus detection assays.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jul;51(7):2172-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00548-13. Epub 2013 May 1.

Abstract

A number of diagnostic tests are available for dengue virus (DENV) detection, including a variety of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). However, reports describing a direct comparison of different NAATs have been limited. In this study, we report the design of an internally controlled real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) that detects all four DENV serotypes but does not distinguish between them (the pan-DENV assay). Two hundred clinical samples were then tested using four different DENV RT-PCR assays: the pan-DENV assay, a commercially produced, internally controlled DENV rRT-PCR (the Altona assay), a widely used heminested RT-PCR, and a serotype-specific multiplex rRT-PCR assay. The pan-DENV assay had a linear range extending from 1.0 to 7.0 log10 cDNA equivalents/μl and a lower limit of 95% detection ranging from 1.7 to 7.6 cDNA equivalents/μl, depending on the serotype. When measured against a composite reference standard, the pan-DENV assay proved to be more clinically sensitive than either the Altona or heminested assays, with a sensitivity of 98.0% compared to 72.3% and 78.8%, respectively (P ≤ 0.0001 for both comparisons). The pan-DENV assay detected DENV in significantly more samples collected on or after day 5 of illness and in a subgroup of patients with detectable anti-DENV IgM at presentation. No significant difference in sensitivity was observed between the pan-DENV assay and the multiplex rRT-PCR, despite the presence of an internal control in the former. The detection of DENV RNA late in the course of clinical illness should serve to lengthen the period during which a confirmed molecular diagnosis of DENV infection can be provided.

摘要

有许多诊断检测可用于登革热病毒 (DENV) 的检测,包括各种核酸扩增检测 (NAATs)。然而,关于不同 NAAT 直接比较的报告一直有限。在这项研究中,我们报告了一种内部对照实时逆转录 PCR (rRT-PCR) 的设计,该检测可以检测到所有四种 DENV 血清型,但不能区分它们(泛 DENV 检测)。然后,使用四种不同的 DENV RT-PCR 检测方法对 200 个临床样本进行了检测:泛 DENV 检测、商业化生产的内部对照 DENV rRT-PCR(Altona 检测)、广泛使用的半巢式 RT-PCR 和血清型特异性多重 rRT-PCR 检测。泛 DENV 检测的线性范围从 1.0 到 7.0 log10 cDNA 当量/μl 不等,95%检测下限从 1.7 到 7.6 cDNA 当量/μl 不等,具体取决于血清型。当与复合参考标准进行比较时,泛 DENV 检测的临床敏感性明显高于 Altona 或半巢式检测,敏感性分别为 98.0%、72.3%和 78.8%(两者比较均 P≤0.0001)。泛 DENV 检测在疾病发作后第 5 天或更晚采集的样本以及在就诊时可检测到抗 DENV IgM 的患者亚组中检测到 DENV 的频率更高。尽管在前者中存在内部对照,但在泛 DENV 检测和多重 rRT-PCR 之间未观察到敏感性的显著差异。在临床疾病过程中晚期检测到 DENV RNA 应能延长提供 DENV 感染确认分子诊断的时间。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
The economic burden of dengue.登革热的经济负担。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 May;86(5):743-744. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0157.
5
Unusual dengue virus 3 epidemic in Nicaragua, 2009.2009 年尼加拉瓜罕见的登革热病毒 3 型疫情。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Nov;5(11):e1394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001394. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
9
Evaluation of diagnostic tests: dengue.诊断检测评估:登革热
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Dec;8(12 Suppl):S30-8. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2459.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验