School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 May 1;54(5):3790-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11485.
To compare the on-road driving performance of visually impaired drivers using bioptic telescopes with age-matched controls.
Participants included 23 persons (mean age = 33 ± 12 years) with visual acuity of 20/63 to 20/200 who were legally licensed to drive through a state bioptic driving program, and 23 visually normal age-matched controls (mean age = 33 ± 12 years). On-road driving was assessed in an instrumented dual-brake vehicle along 14.6 miles of city, suburban, and controlled-access highways. Two backseat evaluators independently rated driving performance using a standardized scoring system. Vehicle control was assessed through vehicle instrumentation and video recordings used to evaluate head movements, lane-keeping, pedestrian detection, and frequency of bioptic telescope use.
Ninety-six percent (22/23) of bioptic drivers and 100% (23/23) of controls were rated as safe to drive by the evaluators. There were no group differences for pedestrian detection, or ratings for scanning, speed, gap judgments, braking, indicator use, or obeying signs/signals. Bioptic drivers received worse ratings than controls for lane position and steering steadiness and had lower rates of correct sign and traffic signal recognition. Bioptic drivers made significantly more right head movements, drove more often over the right-hand lane marking, and exhibited more sudden braking than controls.
Drivers with central vision loss who are licensed to drive through a bioptic driving program can display proficient on-road driving skills. This raises questions regarding the validity of denying such drivers a license without the opportunity to train with a bioptic telescope and undergo on-road evaluation.
比较使用双目望远镜的视障驾驶员与年龄匹配的对照组在道路上的驾驶表现。
参与者包括 23 名视力为 20/63 至 20/200 的人,他们通过州立双目驾驶计划获得合法驾驶执照,并且与 23 名视力正常的年龄匹配对照组(平均年龄 = 33 ± 12 岁)。在装有仪器的双制动车辆中,在 14.6 英里的城市、郊区和控制接入高速公路上评估道路驾驶。两名后座评估员使用标准化评分系统独立评估驾驶表现。通过车辆仪表和视频记录评估车辆控制,以评估头部运动、车道保持、行人检测以及使用双目望远镜的频率。
96%(22/23)的双目驾驶员和 100%(23/23)的对照组被评估员评为安全驾驶。在行人检测或扫描、速度、间隙判断、制动、指示器使用或遵守标志/信号方面,两组之间没有差异。双目驾驶员在车道位置和转向稳定性方面的评分比对照组差,并且正确识别标志和交通信号的比例较低。双目驾驶员比对照组更多地向右转头,更多地在右侧车道标记上行驶,并且比对照组更频繁地突然制动。
通过双目驾驶计划获得驾驶执照的中央视力丧失驾驶员可以表现出熟练的道路驾驶技能。这就提出了一个问题,即未经使用双目望远镜培训和进行道路评估,就拒绝此类驾驶员获得驾照是否合理。