Fuller Christina H, Brugge Doug, Williams Paige, Mittleman Murray, Durant John L, Spengler John D
Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, 401 Park Drive, 4th Floor West, Landmark Center, Boston, MA 02215,
Atmos Environ (1994). 2012 Sep;57:257-265. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.04.004.
Ultrafine particles (UFP; aerodynamic diameter < 0.1 micrometers) are a ubiquitous exposure in the urban environment and are elevated near highways. Most epidemiological studies of UFP health effects use central site monitoring data, which may misclassify exposure. Our aims were to: (1) examine the relationship between distant and proximate monitoring sites and their ability to predict hourly UFP concentration measured at residences in an urban community with a major interstate highway and; (2) determine if meteorology and proximity to traffic improve explanatory power. Short-term (1 - 3 weeks) residential monitoring of UFP concentration was conducted at 18 homes. Long-term monitoring was conducted at two near-highway monitoring sites and a central site. We created models of outdoor residential UFP concentration based on concentrations at the near-highway site, at the central site, at both sites together and without fixed sites. UFP concentration at residential sites was more highly correlated with those at a near-highway site than a central site. In regression models of each site alone, a 10% increase in UFP concentration at a near-highway site was associated with a 6% (95% CI: 6%, 7%) increase at residences while a 10% increase in UFP concentration at the central site was associated with a 3% (95% CI: 2%, 3%) increase at residences. A model including both sites showed minimal change in the magnitude of the association between the near-highway site and the residences, but the estimated association with UFP concentration at the central site was substantially attenuated. These associations remained after adjustment for other significant predictors of residential UFP concentration, including distance from highway, wind speed, wind direction, highway traffic volume and precipitation. The use of a central site as an estimate of personal exposure for populations near local emissions of traffic-related air pollutants may result in exposure misclassification.
超细颗粒物(UFP;空气动力学直径<0.1微米)在城市环境中普遍存在,在高速公路附近含量升高。大多数关于UFP健康影响的流行病学研究使用中心站点监测数据,这可能会对暴露情况进行错误分类。我们的目标是:(1)研究远距离和近距离监测站点之间的关系,以及它们预测在有一条主要州际公路的城市社区住宅处测量的每小时UFP浓度的能力;(2)确定气象条件和与交通的距离是否能提高解释力。在18户家庭中进行了UFP浓度的短期(1 - 3周)住宅监测。在两个靠近高速公路的监测站点和一个中心站点进行了长期监测。我们基于靠近高速公路站点、中心站点、两个站点共同的数据以及无固定站点的数据创建了室外住宅UFP浓度模型。住宅站点的UFP浓度与靠近高速公路站点的浓度相关性高于与中心站点的相关性。在单独对每个站点进行的回归模型中,靠近高速公路站点的UFP浓度增加10%与住宅处增加6%(95%置信区间:6%,7%)相关,而中心站点的UFP浓度增加10%与住宅处增加3%(95%置信区间:2%,3%)相关。一个包含两个站点的模型显示靠近高速公路站点与住宅之间关联的幅度变化最小,但与中心站点UFP浓度的估计关联大幅减弱。在对住宅UFP浓度的其他重要预测因素进行调整后,这些关联仍然存在,这些因素包括与高速公路的距离、风速、风向、高速公路交通流量和降水量。将中心站点用作对与交通相关的空气污染物本地排放源附近人群个人暴露的估计可能会导致暴露错误分类。