University of Cincinnati, P.O. Box 210038, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0038, USA,
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Nov;28(11):1430-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2468-3. Epub 2013 May 7.
Depression is prevalent in primary care (PC) practices and poses a considerable public health burden in the United States. Despite nearly four decades of efforts to improve depression care quality in PC practices, a gap remains between desired treatment outcomes and the reality of how depression care is delivered.
This article presents a real-world PC practice model of depression care, elucidating the processes and their influencing conditions.
Grounded theory methodology was used for the data collection and analysis to develop a depression care model. Data were collected from 70 individual interviews (60 to 70 min each), three focus group interviews (n = 24, 2 h each), two surveys per clinician, and investigators' field notes on practice environments. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed for analysis. Surveys and field notes complemented interview data.
Seventy primary care clinicians from 52 PC offices in the Midwest: 28 general internists, 28 family physicians, and 14 nurse practitioners.
A depression care model was developed that illustrates how real-world conditions infuse complexity into each step of the depression care process. Depression care in PC settings is mediated through clinicians' interactions with patients, practice, and the local community. A clinician's interactional familiarity ("familiarity capital") was a powerful facilitator for depression care. For the recognition of depression, three previously reported processes and three conditions were confirmed. For the management of depression, 13 processes and 11 conditions were identified. Empowering the patient was a parallel process to the management of depression.
The clinician's ability to develop and utilize interactional relationships and resources needed to recognize and treat a person with depression is key to depression care in primary care settings. The interactional context of depression care makes empowering the patient central to depression care delivery.
抑郁在初级保健(PC)实践中很普遍,给美国带来了相当大的公共卫生负担。尽管近四十年来,人们一直努力提高 PC 实践中抑郁治疗质量,但在理想的治疗效果和实际的抑郁治疗之间仍存在差距。
本文介绍了一种真实世界的 PC 实践模式下的抑郁护理,阐述了其中的流程及其影响条件。
采用扎根理论方法收集和分析数据,以开发抑郁护理模型。数据来自 70 名个体访谈(每次 60-70 分钟)、3 次焦点小组访谈(n = 24,每次 2 小时)、每位临床医生的 2 份调查以及调查员关于实践环境的现场记录。访谈进行了录音并转录以供分析。调查和现场记录补充了访谈数据。
中西部 52 个 PC 办公室的 70 名初级保健临床医生:28 名普通内科医生、28 名家庭医生和 14 名执业护士。
开发了一种抑郁护理模型,该模型说明了现实条件如何将复杂性注入到抑郁护理过程的每一步中。PC 环境中的抑郁护理是通过临床医生与患者、实践和当地社区的互动来实现的。临床医生的互动熟悉程度(“熟悉资本”)是促进抑郁护理的有力因素。对于抑郁的识别,确认了三个先前报道的过程和三个条件。对于抑郁的管理,确定了 13 个流程和 11 个条件。赋予患者权力是管理抑郁的并行过程。
临床医生识别和治疗患有抑郁的人所需的建立和利用互动关系和资源的能力是 PC 环境中抑郁护理的关键。抑郁护理的互动背景使赋予患者权力成为抑郁护理的核心。