文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Estimation of risk ratios in cohort studies with a common outcome: a simple and efficient two-stage approach.

作者信息

Tchetgen Tchetgen Eric

出版信息

Int J Biostat. 2013 May 7;9(2):251-64. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2013-0007.


DOI:10.1515/ijb-2013-0007
PMID:23658213
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5490504/
Abstract

The risk ratio effect measure is often the main parameter of interest in epidemiologic studies with a binary outcome. In this paper, the author presents a simple and efficient two-stage approach to estimate the risk ratios directly, which does not directly rely on consistency for an estimate of the baseline risk. This latter property is a key advantage of the approach over existing methods, because, unlike these other methods, the proposed approach obviates the need to restrict the predicted risk probabilities to fall below one, in order to recover efficient inferences about risk ratios. An additional appeal of the approach is that it is easy to implement. Finally, when the primary interest is in the effect of a specific binary exposure, a simple doubly robust closed-form estimator is derived, for the multiplicative effect of the exposure. Specifically, we show how one can adjust for confounding by incorporating a working regression model for the propensity score so that the correct inferences about the multiplicative effect of the exposure are recovered if either this model is correct or a working model for the association between confounders and outcome risk is correct, but both do not necessarily hold.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Estimation of risk ratios in cohort studies with a common outcome: a simple and efficient two-stage approach.

Int J Biostat. 2013-5-7

[2]
On a closed-form doubly robust estimator of the adjusted odds ratio for a binary exposure.

Am J Epidemiol. 2013-4-4

[3]
Doubly robust estimation of causal effects.

Am J Epidemiol. 2011-3-8

[4]
Double-robust estimation of an exposure-outcome odds ratio adjusting for confounding in cohort and case-control studies.

Stat Med. 2010-11-5

[5]
Brief Report: Doubly Robust Estimation of Standardized Risk Difference and Ratio in the Exposed Population.

Epidemiology. 2015-11

[6]
Marginal Structural Models for Risk or Prevalence Ratios for a Point Exposure Using a Disease Risk Score.

Am J Epidemiol. 2019-5-1

[7]
A comparison of marginal odds ratio estimators.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2017-2

[8]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[9]
Controlling for confounding via propensity score methods can result in biased estimation of the conditional AUC: A simulation study.

Pharm Stat. 2019-10

[10]
Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.

Stat Med. 2012-10-22

引用本文的文献

[1]
Investigating Mediators of the Poor Pneumonia Outcomes of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Exposed but Uninfected Children.

J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2019-3-28

[2]
Treatment Failures and Excess Mortality Among HIV-Exposed, Uninfected Children With Pneumonia.

J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2015-12

[3]
Association of respiratory viruses with outcomes of severe childhood pneumonia in Botswana.

PLoS One. 2015-5-14

[4]
A note on the control function approach with an instrumental variable and a binary outcome.

Epidemiol Methods. 2014-12

[5]
Partner testing, linkage to care, and HIV-free survival in a program to prevent parent-to-child transmission of HIV in the Highlands of Papua New Guinea.

Glob Health Action. 2014-8-27

本文引用的文献

[1]
Estimation of risk ratios in cohort studies with common outcomes: a Bayesian approach.

Epidemiology. 2010-11

[2]
Re: "Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences".

Am J Epidemiol. 2006-6-15

[3]
Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences.

Am J Epidemiol. 2005-8-1

[4]
Model-based estimation of relative risks and other epidemiologic measures in studies of common outcomes and in case-control studies.

Am J Epidemiol. 2004-8-15

[5]
A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Am J Epidemiol. 2004-4-1

[6]
Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing.

Int J Epidemiol. 1998-2

[7]
The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

N Engl J Med. 1993-9-30

[8]
Odds ratio or relative risk for cross-sectional data?

Int J Epidemiol. 1994-2

[9]
Covariance analysis of censored survival data.

Biometrics. 1974-3

[10]
Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences.

Am J Epidemiol. 1986-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索