Suppr超能文献

用活的、培养的边缘无形体菌株免疫诱导的保护性免疫。

Protective immunity induced by immunization with a live, cultured Anaplasma marginale strain.

作者信息

Hammac G Kenitra, Ku Pei-Shin, Galletti Maria F, Noh Susan M, Scoles Glen A, Palmer Guy H, Brayton Kelly A

机构信息

Program in Genomics, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-7040, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2013 Aug 2;31(35):3617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.069. Epub 2013 May 9.

Abstract

Despite significant economic losses resulting from infection with Anaplasma marginale, a tick-transmitted rickettsial pathogen of cattle, available vaccines provide, at best, only partial protection against clinical disease. The green-fluorescent protein expressing mutant of the A. marginale St. Maries strain is a live, marked vaccine candidate (AmStM-GFP). To test whether AmStM-GFP is safe and provides clinical protection, a group of calves was vaccinated, and clinical parameters, including percent parasitized erythrocytes (PPE), packed cell volume (PCV) and days required to reach peak bacteremia, were measured following inoculation and following tick challenge with wild type St. Maries strain (AmStM). These clinical parameters were compared to those obtained during infection with the A. marginale subsp. centrale vaccine strain (A. centrale) or wild type AmStM. AmStM-GFP resulted in similar clinical parameters to A. centrale, but had a lower maximum PPE, smaller drop in PCV and took longer to reach peak bacteremia than wild type AmStM. AmStM-GFP provided clinical protection, yielding a stable PCV and low bacteremia following challenge, whereas A. centrale only afforded partial clinical protection.

摘要

尽管感染边缘无形体(一种通过蜱传播的牛立克次氏体病原体)会造成重大经济损失,但现有的疫苗充其量只能提供部分临床疾病防护。表达绿色荧光蛋白的边缘无形体圣玛丽斯菌株突变体是一种有标记的活疫苗候选株(AmStM-GFP)。为了测试AmStM-GFP是否安全并能提供临床防护,给一组小牛接种了疫苗,并在接种后以及用野生型圣玛丽斯菌株(AmStM)进行蜱叮咬攻击后,测量了包括寄生红细胞百分比(PPE)、血细胞比容(PCV)以及达到菌血症峰值所需天数等临床参数。将这些临床参数与在感染边缘无形体中央亚种疫苗株(中央无形体)或野生型AmStM期间获得的参数进行比较。AmStM-GFP产生的临床参数与中央无形体相似,但与野生型AmStM相比,其最大PPE较低,PCV下降幅度较小,达到菌血症峰值所需时间更长。AmStM-GFP提供了临床防护,在攻击后产生了稳定的PCV和低菌血症,而中央无形体仅提供了部分临床防护。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95a7/3903126/3ab7a41ff6d7/nihms531215f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Recent advances in genetic systems in obligate intracellular human-pathogenic bacteria.专性细胞内人体致病菌中遗传系统的最新进展。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jun 19;13:1202245. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1202245. eCollection 2023.
6
Bovine Anaplasmosis: Will there ever be an almighty effective vaccine?牛无形体病:会有万能有效的疫苗吗?
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 5;9:946545. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.946545. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

10
Transformation of Anaplasma marginale.边虫的转化。
Vet Parasitol. 2010 Feb 10;167(2-4):167-74. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.09.018. Epub 2009 Sep 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验