Hammac G Kenitra, Ku Pei-Shin, Galletti Maria F, Noh Susan M, Scoles Glen A, Palmer Guy H, Brayton Kelly A
Program in Genomics, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-7040, USA.
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 2;31(35):3617-22. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.04.069. Epub 2013 May 9.
Despite significant economic losses resulting from infection with Anaplasma marginale, a tick-transmitted rickettsial pathogen of cattle, available vaccines provide, at best, only partial protection against clinical disease. The green-fluorescent protein expressing mutant of the A. marginale St. Maries strain is a live, marked vaccine candidate (AmStM-GFP). To test whether AmStM-GFP is safe and provides clinical protection, a group of calves was vaccinated, and clinical parameters, including percent parasitized erythrocytes (PPE), packed cell volume (PCV) and days required to reach peak bacteremia, were measured following inoculation and following tick challenge with wild type St. Maries strain (AmStM). These clinical parameters were compared to those obtained during infection with the A. marginale subsp. centrale vaccine strain (A. centrale) or wild type AmStM. AmStM-GFP resulted in similar clinical parameters to A. centrale, but had a lower maximum PPE, smaller drop in PCV and took longer to reach peak bacteremia than wild type AmStM. AmStM-GFP provided clinical protection, yielding a stable PCV and low bacteremia following challenge, whereas A. centrale only afforded partial clinical protection.
尽管感染边缘无形体(一种通过蜱传播的牛立克次氏体病原体)会造成重大经济损失,但现有的疫苗充其量只能提供部分临床疾病防护。表达绿色荧光蛋白的边缘无形体圣玛丽斯菌株突变体是一种有标记的活疫苗候选株(AmStM-GFP)。为了测试AmStM-GFP是否安全并能提供临床防护,给一组小牛接种了疫苗,并在接种后以及用野生型圣玛丽斯菌株(AmStM)进行蜱叮咬攻击后,测量了包括寄生红细胞百分比(PPE)、血细胞比容(PCV)以及达到菌血症峰值所需天数等临床参数。将这些临床参数与在感染边缘无形体中央亚种疫苗株(中央无形体)或野生型AmStM期间获得的参数进行比较。AmStM-GFP产生的临床参数与中央无形体相似,但与野生型AmStM相比,其最大PPE较低,PCV下降幅度较小,达到菌血症峰值所需时间更长。AmStM-GFP提供了临床防护,在攻击后产生了稳定的PCV和低菌血症,而中央无形体仅提供了部分临床防护。