• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低 BRAF 和 NRAS 表达水平与转移性黑色素瘤患者对 DTIC 治疗的临床获益和预后相关。

Low BRAF and NRAS expression levels are associated with clinical benefit from DTIC therapy and prognosis in metastatic melanoma.

机构信息

Section of Oncology, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Clin Exp Metastasis. 2013 Oct;30(7):867-76. doi: 10.1007/s10585-013-9587-4. Epub 2013 May 15.

DOI:10.1007/s10585-013-9587-4
PMID:23673558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3837233/
Abstract

Metastatic melanoma is characterized by a poor response to chemotherapy. Furthermore, there is a lack of established predictive and prognostic markers. In this single institution study, we correlated mutation status and expression levels of BRAF and NRAS to dacarbazine (DTIC) treatment response as well as progression-free and overall survival in a cohort of 85 patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma. Neither BRAF nor NRAS mutation status correlated to treatment response. However, patients with tumors harboring NRAS mutations had a shorter overall survival (p < 0.001) compared to patients with tumors wild-type for NRAS. Patients having a clinical benefit (objective response or stable disease at 3 months) on DTIC therapy had lower BRAF and NRAS expression levels compared to patients progressing on therapy (p = 0.037 and 0.003, respectively). For BRAF expression, this association was stronger among patients with tumors wild-type for BRAF (p = 0.005). Further, low BRAF as well as NRAS expression levels were associated with a longer progression-free survival in the total population (p = 0.004 and <0.001, respectively). Contrasting low NRAS expression levels, which were associated with improved overall survival in the total population (p = 0.01), low BRAF levels were associated with improved overall survival only among patients with tumors wild-type for BRAF (p = 0.013). These findings indicate that BRAF and NRAS expression levels may influence responses to DTIC as well as prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma.

摘要

转移性黑色素瘤对化疗反应较差。此外,缺乏既定的预测和预后标志物。在这项单机构研究中,我们将 BRAF 和 NRAS 的突变状态和表达水平与达卡巴嗪(DTIC)治疗反应以及 85 名晚期黑色素瘤患者的无进展生存期和总生存期相关联。BRAF 或 NRAS 突变状态与治疗反应均无相关性。然而,携带 NRAS 突变的肿瘤患者的总生存期较短(p<0.001),与 NRAS 野生型肿瘤患者相比。在 DTIC 治疗中有临床获益(3 个月时客观缓解或疾病稳定)的患者与进展性疾病患者相比,BRAF 和 NRAS 的表达水平较低(p=0.037 和 0.003)。对于 BRAF 表达,在 BRAF 野生型肿瘤患者中这种相关性更强(p=0.005)。此外,在总人群中,低 BRAF 和 NRAS 表达水平与无进展生存期延长相关(p=0.004 和 <0.001)。与低 NRAS 表达水平相关的总生存期改善相反(p=0.01),在总人群中,低 BRAF 水平仅与 BRAF 野生型肿瘤患者的总生存期改善相关(p=0.013)。这些发现表明,BRAF 和 NRAS 表达水平可能影响晚期黑色素瘤患者对 DTIC 的反应和预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30c8/3837233/61dd53092568/10585_2013_9587_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30c8/3837233/7d3f265d0546/10585_2013_9587_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30c8/3837233/dd598937d171/10585_2013_9587_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30c8/3837233/3caddf3c75da/10585_2013_9587_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30c8/3837233/61dd53092568/10585_2013_9587_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30c8/3837233/7d3f265d0546/10585_2013_9587_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30c8/3837233/dd598937d171/10585_2013_9587_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30c8/3837233/3caddf3c75da/10585_2013_9587_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30c8/3837233/61dd53092568/10585_2013_9587_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Low BRAF and NRAS expression levels are associated with clinical benefit from DTIC therapy and prognosis in metastatic melanoma.低 BRAF 和 NRAS 表达水平与转移性黑色素瘤患者对 DTIC 治疗的临床获益和预后相关。
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2013 Oct;30(7):867-76. doi: 10.1007/s10585-013-9587-4. Epub 2013 May 15.
2
Correlation of BRAF and NRAS mutation status with outcome, site of distant metastasis and response to chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma.BRAF 和 NRAS 基因突变状态与转移性黑色素瘤的预后、远处转移部位和化疗反应的相关性。
Br J Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;111(2):292-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.287. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
3
The clinical significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in a clinic-based metastatic melanoma cohort.一项基于临床的转移性黑色素瘤队列中 BRAF 和 NRAS 突变的临床意义。
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Nov;169(5):1049-55. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12504.
4
Differential chemosensitivity to antifolate drugs between RAS and BRAF melanoma cells.RAS和BRAF黑色素瘤细胞对抗叶酸药物的化学敏感性差异
Mol Cancer. 2014 Jun 19;13:154. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-154.
5
Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care.BRAF 和 NRAS 突变在黑色素瘤中的预后意义:一项来自常规护理的德国研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 10;17(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3529-5.
6
Association Between NRAS and BRAF Mutational Status and Melanoma-Specific Survival Among Patients With Higher-Risk Primary Melanoma.NRAS 和 BRAF 基因突变状态与高危原发性黑色素瘤患者的黑色素瘤特异性生存之间的关联。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Jun;1(3):359-68. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0493.
7
, and Advanced Melanoma: Clinico-pathological Features, Targeted-Therapy Strategies and Survival.以及晚期黑色素瘤:临床病理特征、靶向治疗策略与生存情况
Anticancer Res. 2017 Dec;37(12):7043-7048. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12175.
8
Prognostic and predictive values of oncogenic BRAF, NRAS, c-KIT and MITF in cutaneous and mucous melanoma.致癌 BRAF、NRAS、c-KIT 和 MITF 在皮肤和黏膜黑色素瘤中的预后和预测价值。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Aug;29(8):1530-8. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12910. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
9
KIT, NRAS, BRAF and PTEN mutations in a sample of Swedish patients with acral lentiginous melanoma.肢端雀斑样黑素瘤瑞典患者样本中的 KIT、NRAS、BRAF 和 PTEN 突变。
J Dermatol Sci. 2013 Dec;72(3):284-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
10
Biologic subtypes of melanoma predict survival benefit of combination anti-PD1+anti-CTLA4 immune checkpoint inhibitors versus anti-PD1 monotherapy.黑色素瘤的生物学亚型预测联合抗 PD1+抗 CTLA4 免疫检查点抑制剂与抗 PD1 单药治疗相比的生存获益。
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Jan;9(1). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001642.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating therapeutic efficacy of dacarbazine and temozolomide, alone and in combination with siRNA in A375 human melanoma cell line.研究达卡巴嗪和替莫唑胺单独及与小干扰RNA联合应用于A375人黑色素瘤细胞系的治疗效果。
Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2025;28(6):772-783. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2025.84187.18208.
2
Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Immunotherapy for Cancer.卡介苗免疫疗法治疗癌症
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 May 1;9(5):439. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9050439.
3
Differential responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors of melanoma cell lines BRAF V600E-mutated.

本文引用的文献

1
BRAF mutation, NRAS mutation, and the absence of an immune-related expressed gene profile predict poor outcome in patients with stage III melanoma.BRAF 突变、NRAS 突变和缺乏免疫相关表达基因谱可预测 III 期黑色素瘤患者的不良预后。
J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Feb;133(2):509-17. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.283. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
2
A landscape of driver mutations in melanoma.黑色素瘤中的驱动基因突变全景。
Cell. 2012 Jul 20;150(2):251-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.024.
3
Prognostic value of BRAF(V⁶⁰⁰) mutations in melanoma patients after resection of metastatic lymph nodes.
BRAF V600E 突变的黑色素瘤细胞系对 BRAF 抑制剂的差异反应性。
J Transl Med. 2020 May 11;18(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02350-8.
4
Prognostic Value of NRAS Gene for Survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.NRAS基因对结直肠癌患者生存的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Nov 28;19(11):3001-3008. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.11.3001.
5
Clinical Implications of NRAS Overexpression in Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Patients.NRAS 过表达在可切除胰腺癌患者中的临床意义
Pathol Oncol Res. 2019 Jan;25(1):269-278. doi: 10.1007/s12253-017-0341-0. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
6
overexpression independent of mutations confers an adverse prognosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia.在细胞遗传学正常的急性髓系白血病中,不依赖于突变的过表达提示不良预后。
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 2;8(39):66087-66097. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19798. eCollection 2017 Sep 12.
7
Efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in Chinese patients with melanoma.纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇联合卡铂在中国黑色素瘤患者中的疗效与安全性
Med Oncol. 2015 Sep;32(9):234. doi: 10.1007/s12032-015-0679-7. Epub 2015 Aug 23.
8
Performance comparison of three BRAF V600E detection methods in malignant melanoma and colorectal cancer specimens.三种BRAF V600E检测方法在恶性黑色素瘤和结直肠癌标本中的性能比较
Tumour Biol. 2015 Feb;36(2):1003-13. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2711-5. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
9
MEK targeting in N-RAS mutated metastatic melanoma.针对N-RAS突变型转移性黑色素瘤的MEK靶向治疗
Mol Cancer. 2014 Mar 4;13:45. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-45.
BRAF(V600) 突变在转移性淋巴结切除术后黑色素瘤患者中的预后价值。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;19(13):4314-21. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2457-5. Epub 2012 Jul 7.
4
Dabrafenib in BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.达拉非尼治疗 BRAF 突变型转移性黑色素瘤:一项多中心、开放标签、III 期随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2012 Jul 28;380(9839):358-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60868-X. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
5
Improved survival with MEK inhibition in BRAF-mutated melanoma.MEK 抑制对 BRAF 突变型黑色素瘤的生存改善。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 12;367(2):107-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203421. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
6
BRAF/NRAS mutation frequencies among primary tumors and metastases in patients with melanoma.黑色素瘤患者原发肿瘤和转移灶中 BRAF/NRAS 突变频率。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10;30(20):2522-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.2452. Epub 2012 May 21.
7
Distinguishing clinicopathologic features of patients with V600E and V600K BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma.区分 V600E 和 V600K BRAF 突变型转移性黑色素瘤患者的临床病理特征。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jun 15;18(12):3242-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0052. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
8
Melanoma whole-exome sequencing identifies (V600E)B-RAF amplification-mediated acquired B-RAF inhibitor resistance.黑色素瘤全外显子组测序鉴定出(V600E)B-RAF 扩增介导的获得性 B-RAF 抑制剂耐药性。
Nat Commun. 2012 Mar 6;3:724. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1727.
9
Survival in BRAF V600-mutant advanced melanoma treated with vemurafenib.维莫非尼治疗 BRAF V600 突变型晚期黑色素瘤的生存情况。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 23;366(8):707-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112302.
10
NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma.NRAS 突变状态是转移性黑色素瘤的一个独立预后因素。
Cancer. 2012 Aug 15;118(16):4014-23. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26724. Epub 2011 Dec 16.