• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶舱资源管理培训评估的初步结果:飞行机组人员的绩效评级

Preliminary results from the evaluation of cockpit resource management training: performance ratings of flightcrews.

作者信息

Helmreich R L, Wilhelm J A, Gregorich S E, Chidester T R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin 78712.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 1990 Jun;61(6):576-9.

PMID:2369400
Abstract

The first data from the NASA/University of Texas Crew Performance project on the behavior of flightcrews with and without formal training in Cockpit Resource Management (CRM) is reported. Expert observers made detailed ratings of 15 components of crew behavior in both line operations and in full mission simulations. The results indicate that such training in crew coordination concepts increases the percentage of crews rated as above average in performance and decreases the percentage rated as below average. The data also show high and unexpected degrees of variations in rated performance among crews flying different aircraft within the same organization. It was also found that the specific behaviors that triggered observer ratings of above or below average performance differed markedly between organizations. Characteristics of experts' ratings and future research needs are also discussed.

摘要

美国国家航空航天局(NASA)/德克萨斯大学机组人员绩效项目公布了关于接受和未接受驾驶舱资源管理(CRM)正式培训的机组人员行为的首批数据。专家观察员对实际飞行操作和全任务模拟中机组人员行为的15个组成部分进行了详细评分。结果表明,这种机组人员协作概念培训提高了被评为绩效高于平均水平的机组人员比例,降低了被评为低于平均水平的机组人员比例。数据还显示,同一组织内驾驶不同飞机的机组人员在评分绩效方面存在高度且出人意料的差异。研究还发现,不同组织之间,触发观察员对高于或低于平均水平绩效评分的具体行为存在显著差异。文中还讨论了专家评分的特点以及未来的研究需求。

相似文献

1
Preliminary results from the evaluation of cockpit resource management training: performance ratings of flightcrews.驾驶舱资源管理培训评估的初步结果:飞行机组人员的绩效评级
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1990 Jun;61(6):576-9.
2
Does CRM training work?客户关系管理培训有效吗?
Air Line Pilot. 1991 May;60(5):17-20.
3
How effective is cockpit resource management training? Exploring issues in evaluating the impact of programs to enhance crew coordination.驾驶舱资源管理培训的效果如何?探讨评估旨在加强机组人员协作的培训项目影响时存在的问题。
Flight Saf Dig. 1990 May;9(5):1-17.
4
Crew resource management: a simulator study comparing fixed versus formed aircrews.机组资源管理:一项比较固定机组与编队机组的模拟器研究。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996 Jan;67(1):3-7.
5
The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation.商业航空中机组资源管理培训的发展历程。
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1999;9(1):19-32. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_2.
6
Cockpit resource management: exploring the attitude-performance linkage.驾驶舱资源管理:探索态度与表现的联系。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1986 Dec;57(12 Pt 1):1198-200.
7
Selecting pilots with crew resource management skills.选拔具备机组资源管理技能的飞行员。
Int J Aviat Psychol. 2000 Oct;10(4):377-92. doi: 10.1207/S15327108IJAP1004_5.
8
Training needs for advanced technology flight decks.
ICAO J. 1991 May;46(5):20-1.
9
Control in the cockpit: crews vs. computers.驾驶舱中的控制权:机组人员与计算机
Aerosp Am. 1996 Aug;34(8):28-33.
10
Autogenic feedback training improves pilot performance during emergency flying conditions.自生反馈训练可改善飞行员在紧急飞行状况下的表现。
Flight Saf Dig. 1993;Jul:1-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Aviation: a pilot study for safety in gastroenterology?航空领域:一项关于胃肠病学安全性的初步研究?
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr;3(2):90-91. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2011-100101. Epub 2012 Feb 5.
2
Does classroom-based crew resource management training have an effect on attitudes between doctors and nurses?基于课堂的团队资源管理培训对医生和护士之间的态度有影响吗?
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Apr 9;7:109-14. doi: 10.5116/ijme.56f5.6804.
3
Simulation-based education for building clinical teams.基于模拟的临床团队组建教育。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010 Oct;3(4):360-8. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.70750.
4
Measuring safety culture in the ambulatory setting: the safety attitudes questionnaire--ambulatory version.测量门诊环境中的安全文化:安全态度问卷——门诊版
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jan;22(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0114-7.
5
Translating teamwork behaviours from aviation to healthcare: development of behavioural markers for neonatal resuscitation.将航空领域的团队协作行为应用于医疗保健:新生儿复苏行为标志物的开发
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i57-64. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i57.
6
The simulated operating theatre: comprehensive training for surgical teams.模拟手术室:对外科团队的全面培训。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i27-32. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_1.i27.
7
Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys.医学与航空领域中的失误、压力及团队协作:横断面调查
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):745-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.745.