BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 May 24;13:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-92.
Cereals of baking quality with absent or reduced toxicity are actively sought as alternative therapy to a gluten-free diet (GFD) for patients with coeliac disease (CD). Triticum monococcum, an ancient wheat, is a potential candidate having no toxicity in in-vitro and ex-vivo studies. The aim of our study was to investigate on the safety of administration of a single dose of gluten of Tm in patients with CD on GFD.
We performed a single blind, cross-over study involving 12 CD patients who had been on a GFD for at least 12 months, challenged on day 0, 14 and 28 with a single fixed dose of 2.5 grams of the following (random order): Tm, rice (as reference atoxic protein) and Amygluten (as reference toxic protein) dispersed in a gluten-free pudding. The primary end-point of the study was the change in intestinal permeability, as assessed by changes in the urinary lactulose/rhamnose ratio (L/R ratio) measured by High Pressure Liquid Chromatography. We also assessed the occurrence of adverse gastrointestinal events, graded for intensity and duration according to the WHO scale. Variables were expressed as mean ± SD; paired t-test and χ² test were used as appropriate.
The urinary L/R ratio did not change significantly upon challenge with the 3 cereals, and was 0.055 ± 0.026 for Tm Vs 0.058 ± 0.035 for rice (p = 0.6736) and Vs 0.063 ± 0.054 with Amygluten (p = 0.6071). Adverse gastrointestinal events were 8 for Tm, Vs 11 for rice (p = 0.6321) and Vs 31 for Amygluten p = 0.0016), and, in all cases events were graded as "mild" or "moderate" with TM and rice, and as "severe" or "disabling" in 4 cases during Amygluten.
No definite conclusion can be drawn on the safety of Tm, based on no change in urinary L/R because even Amygluten, a toxic wheat protein, did not cause a significant change in urinary L/R indicating low sensitivity of this methodology in studies on acute toxicity. Tm was, however, well tolerated by all patients providing the rationale for further investigation on the safety of this cereal for CD patients.
EudraCT-AIFA n2008-000697-20.
作为对乳糜泻患者无麸质饮食(GFD)的替代疗法,正在积极寻找烘焙质量好且毒性降低或不存在毒性的谷物。古代小麦单粒小麦是一种潜在的候选物,其在体外和体内研究中均无毒。我们研究的目的是研究在 GFD 上接受单剂量 Tm 麸质的乳糜泻患者的安全性。
我们进行了一项单盲、交叉研究,涉及 12 名乳糜泻患者,他们已经接受 GFD 治疗至少 12 个月,在第 0、14 和 28 天接受以下 2.5 克固定剂量的单一挑战:Tm、大米(作为无毒蛋白的参考)和 Amygluten(作为参考有毒蛋白)分散在无麸质布丁中。研究的主要终点是通过高效液相色谱法测量的尿乳果糖/鼠李糖比值(L/R 比值)的变化来评估肠通透性的变化。我们还根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的标准评估了不良胃肠道事件的发生情况,按强度和持续时间进行分级。变量表示为平均值±标准差;使用配对 t 检验和 χ²检验。
挑战 3 种谷物后,尿 L/R 比值无明显变化,Tm 为 0.055±0.026,大米为 0.058±0.035(p=0.6736),Amygluten 为 0.063±0.054(p=0.6071)。不良胃肠道事件为 Tm 8 例,大米 11 例(p=0.6321),Amygluten 31 例(p=0.0016),所有事件均为 TM 和大米“轻度”或“中度”,Amygluten 为 4 例“重度”或“残疾”。
由于即使是有毒的小麦蛋白 Amygluten 也未引起尿 L/R 的明显变化,因此无法根据尿 L/R 无变化得出 Tm 安全性的明确结论,这表明该方法在急性毒性研究中的敏感性较低。然而,所有患者均耐受 Tm,为进一步研究该谷物对乳糜泻患者的安全性提供了依据。
EudraCT-AIFA n2008-000697-20。