• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

这算“推动”吗?关于财务健康激励措施,尚无定论。

A "nudge" at all? The jury is still out on financial health incentives.

作者信息

Mitchell Marc, Faulkner Guy

机构信息

Graduate Department of Exercise Sciences, University of Toronto University Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention).

出版信息

Healthc Pap. 2012;12(4):31-6; discussion 64-6. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23221.

DOI:10.12927/hcpap.2013.23221
PMID:23713398
Abstract

A comprehensive, multi-level approach to curb chronic disease-related costs in Canada is needed. One target for intervention is the economic domain. The emergence of user financial incentives (UFI) in public health policy as well as their broad implementation in corporate settings has stimulated a growing but limited body of research in this area. The authors'position is that the jury is still out on the question of their effectiveness in sustaining long-term health behaviour change, given the nature of the UFI that have been designed and delivered to date--that is, UFI with limited theoretical and contextual consideration. It is their contention that manipulating UFI design features (there are seven core features with a range of attributes) to exploit contextual (e.g., personal income) and theoretical (e.g., self-efficacy) factors may optimize UFI effectiveness over the long term. Although UFI are not the solution, they might very well be apart.

摘要

加拿大需要一种全面、多层次的方法来控制与慢性病相关的成本。一个干预目标是经济领域。公共卫生政策中用户经济激励措施(UFI)的出现及其在企业环境中的广泛实施,激发了该领域越来越多但有限的研究。作者的立场是,鉴于迄今为止设计和实施的UFI的性质——即理论和背景考虑有限的UFI,关于它们在维持长期健康行为改变方面的有效性问题仍尚无定论。他们认为,操纵UFI的设计特征(有七个核心特征,具有一系列属性)以利用背景因素(如个人收入)和理论因素(如自我效能感),可能会在长期内优化UFI的有效性。虽然UFI不是解决方案,但它们很可能是解决方案的一部分。

相似文献

1
A "nudge" at all? The jury is still out on financial health incentives.这算“推动”吗?关于财务健康激励措施,尚无定论。
Healthc Pap. 2012;12(4):31-6; discussion 64-6. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23221.
2
Nudge or not: can incentives change health behaviours?是否进行助推:激励措施能否改变健康行为?
Healthc Pap. 2012;12(4):37-41; discussion 64-6. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23222.
3
Why UFI nudges will get stuck in the policy process.为什么统一格式识别(UFI)推动措施会在政策制定过程中受阻。
Healthc Pap. 2012;12(4):53-7; discussion 64-6. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23225.
4
A nudge too far? A nudge at all? On paying people to be healthy.激励过度?还是根本算不上激励?关于付钱让人们保持健康的探讨
Healthc Pap. 2012;12(4):8-16. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23217.
5
To nudge or not to nudge--that is not the question.要不要助推——这不是问题所在。
Healthc Pap. 2012;12(4):48-52; discussion 64-6. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23224.
6
Nudging for health: do we need financial incentives?推动健康:我们需要经济激励措施吗?
Healthc Pap. 2012;12(4):23-6; discussion 64-6. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23219.
7
Wink, wink, nudge, nudge... maybe we need more than incentives to get us moving.使个眼色,碰碰肘……也许要让我们行动起来,光靠激励措施还不够。
Healthc Pap. 2012;12(4):27-30; discussion 64-6. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23220.
8
Redeeming behaviours: a push, not a shove.救赎行为:是推动,而非强迫。
Healthc Pap. 2012;12(4):42-7; discussion 64-6. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23223.
9
The role of behavioral economic incentive design and demographic characteristics in financial incentive-based approaches to changing health behaviors: a meta-analysis.行为经济激励设计和人口统计学特征在基于经济激励改变健康行为方法中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Health Promot. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):314-23. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.140714-LIT-333.
10
Nudging and not nudging: the difference doesn't matter.推动与不推动:差异并无影响。
Healthc Pap. 2012;12(4):18-22; discussion 64-6. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2013.23218.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling Consumer Preferences and Intentions for Cocreated Features of a Combined Diet and Physical Activity App: Cross-Sectional Study in 4 European Countries.揭示消费者对饮食与身体活动联合应用程序共创功能的偏好和意向:4 个欧洲国家的横断面研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Dec 11;10:e44993. doi: 10.2196/44993.
2
Improving oral health in people with severe mental illness (SMI): A systematic review.改善严重精神疾病(SMI)患者的口腔健康:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0260766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260766. eCollection 2021.
3
Evaluating the Carrot Rewards App, a Population-Level Incentive-Based Intervention Promoting Step Counts Across Two Canadian Provinces: Quasi-Experimental Study.
评估胡萝卜奖励应用程序,一项基于激励措施的人群层面干预措施,在加拿大两个省份推广步数:准实验研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Sep 20;6(9):e178. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9912.
4
Acceptability of financial incentives for maintenance of weight loss in mid-older adults: a mixed methods study.中老年人维持体重减轻的经济激励措施的可接受性:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5136-z.
5
Uptake of an Incentive-Based mHealth App: Process Evaluation of the Carrot Rewards App.基于激励机制的移动健康应用的采用情况:胡萝卜奖励应用的过程评估
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 30;5(5):e70. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7323.
6
Development of the Health Incentive Program Questionnaire (HIP-Q) in a cardiac rehabilitation population.心脏康复人群健康激励计划问卷(HIP-Q)的编制
Transl Behav Med. 2015 Dec;5(4):443-59. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0330-3. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
7
The effectiveness of loyalty rewards to promote the use of an Internet-based heart health program.忠诚度奖励对促进基于互联网的心脏健康计划使用的有效性。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jul 2;16(7):e163. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3458.