Information Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
PLoS One. 2013 May 29;8(5):e64933. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064933. Print 2013.
Evidence-based medicine employs expert opinion and clinical data to inform clinical decision making. The objective of this study is to determine whether it is possible to complement these sources of evidence with information about physician "group intelligence" that exists in electronic health records. Specifically, we measured laboratory test "repeat intervals", defined as the amount of time it takes for a physician to repeat a test that was previously ordered for the same patient. Our assumption is that while the result of a test is a direct measure of one marker of a patient's health, the physician's decision to order the test is based on multiple factors including past experience, available treatment options, and information about the patient that might not be coded in the electronic health record. By examining repeat intervals in aggregate over large numbers of patients, we show that it is possible to 1) determine what laboratory test results physicians consider "normal", 2) identify subpopulations of patients that deviate from the norm, and 3) identify situations where laboratory tests are over-ordered. We used laboratory tests as just one example of how physician group intelligence can be used to support evidence based medicine in a way that is automated and continually updated.
循证医学运用专家意见和临床数据为临床决策提供信息。本研究的目的是确定是否可以利用电子病历中存在的关于医生“群体智慧”的信息来补充这些证据来源。具体来说,我们测量了实验室检测的“重复间隔”,即医生重复为同一患者上次开的检测所需的时间。我们的假设是,虽然检测结果是患者健康状况的一个直接指标,但医生决定进行检测的依据是多个因素,包括以往的经验、可用的治疗方案以及可能未在电子病历中编码的患者信息。通过对大量患者的重复间隔进行汇总分析,我们表明可以:1)确定医生认为“正常”的实验室检测结果;2)识别偏离常态的患者亚群;3)确定实验室检测过度开单的情况。我们使用实验室检测作为一个例子,说明了如何以自动化和持续更新的方式利用医生群体智慧来支持循证医学。