• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物表型空间中的帕累托前沿的几何形状。

The geometry of the Pareto front in biological phenotype space.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science 234 Herzl Street, Rehovot, 76100, Israel.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2013 Jun;3(6):1471-83. doi: 10.1002/ece3.528. Epub 2013 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.528
PMID:23789060
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3686184/
Abstract

When organisms perform a single task, selection leads to phenotypes that maximize performance at that task. When organisms need to perform multiple tasks, a trade-off arises because no phenotype can optimize all tasks. Recent work addressed this question, and assumed that the performance at each task decays with distance in trait space from the best phenotype at that task. Under this assumption, the best-fitness solutions (termed the Pareto front) lie on simple low-dimensional shapes in trait space: line segments, triangles and other polygons. The vertices of these polygons are specialists at a single task. Here, we generalize this finding, by considering performance functions of general form, not necessarily functions that decay monotonically with distance from their peak. We find that, except for performance functions with highly eccentric contours, simple shapes in phenotype space are still found, but with mildly curving edges instead of straight ones. In a wide range of systems, complex data on multiple quantitative traits, which might be expected to fill a high-dimensional phenotype space, is predicted instead to collapse onto low-dimensional shapes; phenotypes near the vertices of these shapes are predicted to be specialists, and can thus suggest which tasks may be at play.

摘要

当生物体执行单一任务时,选择会导致表型最大化该任务的性能。当生物体需要执行多个任务时,就会出现权衡,因为没有表型可以优化所有任务。最近的工作解决了这个问题,并假设每个任务的性能都会随着与该任务最佳表型在特征空间中的距离的增加而下降。在这种假设下,最佳适应度解(称为 Pareto 前沿)位于特征空间中的简单低维形状上:线段、三角形和其他多边形。这些多边形的顶点是单一任务的专家。在这里,我们通过考虑一般形式的性能函数来推广这一发现,而不一定是与从峰值到距离单调下降的函数。我们发现,除了具有高度偏心轮廓的性能函数外,在表型空间中仍然可以找到简单的形状,但边缘是轻微弯曲的而不是直线的。在广泛的系统中,对多个定量性状的复杂数据,预计会填充高维表型空间,反而被预测会塌缩到低维形状上;这些形状顶点附近的表型预计是专家,因此可以提示哪些任务可能在起作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/b431d6f225c9/ece30003-1471-f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/51db5dd33b11/ece30003-1471-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/f1031264341c/ece30003-1471-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/3ac564f206e7/ece30003-1471-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/d2d89d8e63cd/ece30003-1471-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/3857c1286135/ece30003-1471-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/805a8b6601fa/ece30003-1471-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/741727793755/ece30003-1471-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/03089f9dcab3/ece30003-1471-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/15f4ec2cc5b1/ece30003-1471-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/77a5d95462a1/ece30003-1471-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/80722c78ab8b/ece30003-1471-f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/e2d48a3ed1b2/ece30003-1471-f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/b431d6f225c9/ece30003-1471-f13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/51db5dd33b11/ece30003-1471-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/f1031264341c/ece30003-1471-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/3ac564f206e7/ece30003-1471-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/d2d89d8e63cd/ece30003-1471-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/3857c1286135/ece30003-1471-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/805a8b6601fa/ece30003-1471-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/741727793755/ece30003-1471-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/03089f9dcab3/ece30003-1471-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/15f4ec2cc5b1/ece30003-1471-f9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/77a5d95462a1/ece30003-1471-f10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/80722c78ab8b/ece30003-1471-f11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/e2d48a3ed1b2/ece30003-1471-f12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da86/3686184/b431d6f225c9/ece30003-1471-f13.jpg

相似文献

1
The geometry of the Pareto front in biological phenotype space.生物表型空间中的帕累托前沿的几何形状。
Ecol Evol. 2013 Jun;3(6):1471-83. doi: 10.1002/ece3.528. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
2
The Mass-Longevity Triangle: Pareto Optimality and the Geometry of Life-History Trait Space.质量-寿命三角:帕累托最优与生活史性状空间的几何学
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 14;11(10):e1004524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004524. eCollection 2015 Oct.
3
Evolutionary trade-offs, Pareto optimality, and the geometry of phenotype space.进化权衡、帕累托最优和表型空间的几何形状。
Science. 2012 Jun 1;336(6085):1157-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1217405. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
4
Evolutionary trade-offs and the structure of polymorphisms.进化权衡与多态性结构。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 May 26;373(1747). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0105.
5
Response to comment on "Evolutionary trade-offs, Pareto optimality, and the geometry of phenotype space".对“进化权衡、帕累托最优和表型空间的几何形状”的评论的回应。
Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):757. doi: 10.1126/science.1228921.
6
Archetypes of human cognition defined by time preference for reward and their brain correlates: An evolutionary trade-off approach.由奖励时间偏好定义的人类认知原型及其大脑相关性:一种进化权衡方法。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 15;185:322-334. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.050. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
7
Pareto optimality, economy-effectiveness trade-offs and ion channel degeneracy: improving population modelling for single neurons.帕累托最优、经济有效性权衡和离子通道简并:改进单神经元群体建模。
Open Biol. 2022 Jul;12(7):220073. doi: 10.1098/rsob.220073. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
8
Evolutionary tradeoffs, Pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells.进化权衡、帕累托最优与菊石壳的形态
BMC Syst Biol. 2015 Mar 7;9:12. doi: 10.1186/s12918-015-0149-z.
9
Geometry of the Gene Expression Space of Individual Cells.单个细胞基因表达空间的几何学
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Jul 10;11(7):e1004224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004224. eCollection 2015 Jul.
10
Comment on "Evolutionary trade-offs, Pareto optimality, and the geometry of phenotype space".评“进化权衡、帕累托最优和表型空间的几何形状”。
Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):757. doi: 10.1126/science.1228281.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic pain is linked to a resting-state neural archetype that optimizes learning from punishments.慢性疼痛与一种静息态神经原型相关联,该原型可优化从惩罚中学习的过程。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 17:2025.07.11.664303. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.11.664303.
2
Permutation Tests to Identify Significant Constraint or Promotion Within Biological Scatterplots.用于识别生物散点图中显著约束或促进作用的排列检验。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Nov 21;14(11):e70584. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70584. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
The seasonal behaviour of COVID-19 and its galectin-like culprit of the viral spike.

本文引用的文献

1
A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging.资源觅食中规模与精度之间的权衡。
Oecologia. 1991 Sep;87(4):532-538. doi: 10.1007/BF00320417.
2
Pareto evolution of gene networks: an algorithm to optimize multiple fitness objectives.基因网络的帕累托进化:一种优化多个适应度目标的算法。
Phys Biol. 2012 Oct;9(5):056001. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/5/056001. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
3
Evolutionary trade-offs, Pareto optimality, and the geometry of phenotype space.进化权衡、帕累托最优和表型空间的几何形状。
新冠病毒(COVID-19)的季节性行为及其病毒刺突中类似半乳糖凝集素的致病因素。
Methods Microbiol. 2022;50:27-81. doi: 10.1016/bs.mim.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
4
Pareto optimality, economy-effectiveness trade-offs and ion channel degeneracy: improving population modelling for single neurons.帕累托最优、经济有效性权衡和离子通道简并:改进单神经元群体建模。
Open Biol. 2022 Jul;12(7):220073. doi: 10.1098/rsob.220073. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
Breaking constraints: The development and evolution of extreme fin morphology in the Bramidae.突破限制:Bramidae 中极端鳍形态的发育和进化。
Evol Dev. 2022 Aug;24(3-4):109-124. doi: 10.1111/ede.12409. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
6
Strategies to Assure Optimal Trade-Offs Among Competing Objectives for the Genetic Improvement of Soybean.确保大豆遗传改良的相互竞争目标之间实现最佳权衡的策略。
Front Genet. 2021 Sep 24;12:675500. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.675500. eCollection 2021.
7
Proteomic traits vary across taxa in a coastal Antarctic phytoplankton bloom.在沿海南极浮游植物爆发中,蛋白质组特征在各个分类群中存在差异。
ISME J. 2022 Feb;16(2):569-579. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01084-9. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
8
The Compressed Vocabulary of Microbial Life.微生物生命的精简词汇表。
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jul 7;12:655990. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.655990. eCollection 2021.
9
The geometry of clinical labs and wellness states from deeply phenotyped humans.从深度表型人类中观察临床实验室和健康状态的几何形状。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 11;12(1):3578. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23849-8.
10
Extreme Morphology, Functional Trade-offs, and Evolutionary Dynamics in a Clade of Open-Ocean Fishes (Perciformes: Bramidae).远洋鱼类一个分支(鲈形目:鲳科)中的极端形态、功能权衡与进化动态
Integr Org Biol. 2021 Feb 16;3(1):obab003. doi: 10.1093/iob/obab003. eCollection 2021.
Science. 2012 Jun 1;336(6085):1157-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1217405. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
4
Many-to-One Mapping of Form to Function: A General Principle in Organismal Design?形态到功能的多对一映射:生物体设计的一般原则?
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Apr;45(2):256-62. doi: 10.1093/icb/45.2.256.
5
Evolution and development of shape: integrating quantitative approaches.形态的进化与发育:整合定量方法。
Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Sep;11(9):623-35. doi: 10.1038/nrg2829. Epub 2010 Aug 10.
6
Extinctions in heterogeneous environments and the evolution of modularity.异质环境中的物种灭绝与模块化的演化
Evolution. 2009 Aug;63(8):1964-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00684.x. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
7
Facilitated variation: how evolution learns from past environments to generalize to new environments.适应性变异:进化如何从过去的环境中学习以推广到新环境。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Nov;4(11):e1000206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000206. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
8
The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history.适应的遗传理论:简史
Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Feb;6(2):119-27. doi: 10.1038/nrg1523.
9
Speed and stamina trade-off in lacertid lizards.蜥蜴的速度与耐力权衡
Evolution. 2001 May;55(5):1040-8. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[1040:sastoi]2.0.co;2.
10
Phenotypic clines, plasticity, and morphological trade-offs in an intertidal snail.潮间带蜗牛的表型渐变群、可塑性及形态权衡
Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):151-66. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00016.x.