• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evolutionary trade-offs and the structure of polymorphisms.进化权衡与多态性结构。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 May 26;373(1747). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0105.
2
Evolutionary trade-offs, Pareto optimality, and the geometry of phenotype space.进化权衡、帕累托最优和表型空间的几何形状。
Science. 2012 Jun 1;336(6085):1157-60. doi: 10.1126/science.1217405. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
3
The Mass-Longevity Triangle: Pareto Optimality and the Geometry of Life-History Trait Space.质量-寿命三角:帕累托最优与生活史性状空间的几何学
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 14;11(10):e1004524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004524. eCollection 2015 Oct.
4
The geometry of the Pareto front in biological phenotype space.生物表型空间中的帕累托前沿的几何形状。
Ecol Evol. 2013 Jun;3(6):1471-83. doi: 10.1002/ece3.528. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
5
Archetypes of human cognition defined by time preference for reward and their brain correlates: An evolutionary trade-off approach.由奖励时间偏好定义的人类认知原型及其大脑相关性:一种进化权衡方法。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 15;185:322-334. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.050. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
6
Pareto optimality, economy-effectiveness trade-offs and ion channel degeneracy: improving population modelling for single neurons.帕累托最优、经济有效性权衡和离子通道简并:改进单神经元群体建模。
Open Biol. 2022 Jul;12(7):220073. doi: 10.1098/rsob.220073. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
The Emergence of Non-Linear Evolutionary Trade-offs and the Maintenance of Genetic Polymorphisms.非线性进化权衡的出现与遗传多态性的维持
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 1:2024.05.29.595890. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.29.595890.
8
Trade-Offs (and Constraints) in Organismal Biology.生物体生物学中的权衡(和约束)。
Physiol Biochem Zool. 2022 Jan-Feb;95(1):82-112. doi: 10.1086/717897.
9
Insights from life history theory for an explicit treatment of trade-offs in conservation biology.来自生活史理论的见解,用于在保护生物学中明确处理权衡问题。
Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):738-47. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12442. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
10
Response to comment on "Evolutionary trade-offs, Pareto optimality, and the geometry of phenotype space".对“进化权衡、帕累托最优和表型空间的几何形状”的评论的回应。
Science. 2013 Feb 15;339(6121):757. doi: 10.1126/science.1228921.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic pain is linked to a resting-state neural archetype that optimizes learning from punishments.慢性疼痛与一种静息态神经原型相关联,该原型可优化从惩罚中学习的过程。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 17:2025.07.11.664303. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.11.664303.
2
Body Temperature Differences Between Green And Brown Grasshoppers Do Not Result From Thermal Physiology or Thermal Preferences.绿色和棕色蚱蜢之间的体温差异并非由热生理学或热偏好导致。
Ecol Evol. 2025 Mar 11;15(3):e71104. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71104. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
The emergence of nonlinear evolutionary trade-offs and the maintenance of genetic polymorphisms.非线性进化权衡的出现与遗传多态性的维持。
Biol Lett. 2024 Dec;20(12):20240296. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0296. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
4
Heterozygote advantage can explain the extraordinary diversity of immune genes.杂合子优势可以解释免疫基因的非凡多样性。
Elife. 2024 Nov 26;13:e94587. doi: 10.7554/eLife.94587.
5
Dynamic expedition of leading mutations in SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoproteins.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)刺突糖蛋白主要突变的动态研究
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024 May 24;23:2407-2417. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.05.037. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
The Emergence of Non-Linear Evolutionary Trade-offs and the Maintenance of Genetic Polymorphisms.非线性进化权衡的出现与遗传多态性的维持
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 1:2024.05.29.595890. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.29.595890.
7
Sex-dependent control of pheromones on social organization within groups of wild house mice.性别依赖控制信息素对野生家鼠群体社会组织的影响。
Curr Biol. 2023 Apr 24;33(8):1407-1420.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.039. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
8
Tumor diversity and the trade-off between universal cancer tasks.肿瘤异质性与普遍癌症任务之间的权衡。
Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 28;10(1):5423. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13195-1.
9
Evolutionary highways to persistent bacterial infection.通向持续性细菌感染的进化捷径。
Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 7;10(1):629. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08504-7.
10
Self-organization: the fundament of cell biology.自组织:细胞生物学的基础。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 May 26;373(1747). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0103.

本文引用的文献

1
ADAPTIVE RADIATION ALONG GENETIC LINES OF LEAST RESISTANCE.沿阻力最小遗传路线的适应性辐射
Evolution. 1996 Oct;50(5):1766-1774. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03563.x.
2
Unravelling the human genome-phenome relationship using phenome-wide association studies.利用表型全基因组关联研究揭示人类基因组-表型关系。
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Mar;17(3):129-45. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.36. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
3
The Cost of Protein Production.蛋白质生产的成本。
Cell Rep. 2016 Jan 5;14(1):22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.015. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
4
The Mass-Longevity Triangle: Pareto Optimality and the Geometry of Life-History Trait Space.质量-寿命三角:帕累托最优与生活史性状空间的几何学
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Oct 14;11(10):e1004524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004524. eCollection 2015 Oct.
5
Geometry of the Gene Expression Space of Individual Cells.单个细胞基因表达空间的几何学
PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Jul 10;11(7):e1004224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004224. eCollection 2015 Jul.
6
Evolutionary tradeoffs, Pareto optimality and the morphology of ammonite shells.进化权衡、帕累托最优与菊石壳的形态
BMC Syst Biol. 2015 Mar 7;9:12. doi: 10.1186/s12918-015-0149-z.
7
Inferring biological tasks using Pareto analysis of high-dimensional data.基于高维数据的 Pareto 分析推断生物任务。
Nat Methods. 2015 Mar;12(3):233-5, 3 p following 235. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3254. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
8
Epistasis and natural selection shape the mutational architecture of complex traits.上位性和自然选择塑造复杂性状的突变结构。
Nat Commun. 2014 May 14;5:3709. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4709.
9
Developmental bias in the evolution of phalanges.指节骨进化中的发育偏差。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 5;110(45):18190-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315213110. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
10
Archetypal analysis of diverse Pseudomonas aeruginosa transcriptomes reveals adaptation in cystic fibrosis airways.对不同的铜绿假单胞菌转录组进行原型分析揭示了在囊性纤维化气道中的适应性。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Sep 23;14:279. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-279.

进化权衡与多态性结构。

Evolutionary trade-offs and the structure of polymorphisms.

机构信息

Department Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.

Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

出版信息

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 May 26;373(1747). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0105.

DOI:10.1098/rstb.2017.0105
PMID:29632259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5904293/
Abstract

Populations of organisms show genetic differences called polymorphisms. Understanding the effects of polymorphisms is important for biology and medicine. Here, we ask which polymorphisms occur at high frequency when organisms evolve under trade-offs between multiple tasks. Multiple tasks present a problem, because it is not possible to be optimal at all tasks simultaneously and hence compromises are necessary. Recent work indicates that trade-offs lead to a simple geometry of phenotypes in the space of traits: phenotypes fall on the Pareto front, which is shaped as a polytope: a line, triangle, tetrahedron etc. The vertices of these polytopes are the optimal phenotypes for a single task. Up to now, work on this Pareto approach has not considered its genetic underpinnings. Here, we address this by asking how the polymorphism structure of a population is affected by evolution under trade-offs. We simulate a multi-task selection scenario, in which the population evolves to the Pareto front: the line segment between two archetypes or the triangle between three archetypes. We find that polymorphisms that become prevalent in the population have pleiotropic phenotypic effects that align with the Pareto front. Similarly, epistatic effects between prevalent polymorphisms are parallel to the front. Alignment with the front occurs also for asexual mating. Alignment is reduced when drift or linkage is strong, and is replaced by a more complex structure in which many perpendicular allele effects cancel out. Aligned polymorphism structure allows mating to produce offspring that stand a good chance of being optimal multi-taskers in at least one of the locales available to the species.This article is part of the theme issue 'Self-organization in cell biology'.

摘要

生物种群表现出称为多态性的遗传差异。了解多态性的影响对于生物学和医学很重要。在这里,我们提出了这样一个问题:当生物体在多个任务之间的权衡中进化时,哪些多态性会高频出现。多个任务是一个问题,因为不可能同时在所有任务上都达到最优,因此需要妥协。最近的工作表明,权衡导致了在性状空间中表型的简单几何形状:表型落在 Pareto 前沿上,Pareto 前沿呈多面体形状:一条线、一个三角形、一个四面体等。这些多面体的顶点是单个任务的最优表型。到目前为止,这项 Pareto 方法的研究还没有考虑其遗传基础。在这里,我们通过询问在权衡下进化时种群的多态性结构如何受到影响来解决这个问题。我们模拟了一个多任务选择场景,在这个场景中,种群进化到 Pareto 前沿:两个原型之间的线段或三个原型之间的三角形。我们发现,在种群中变得流行的多态性具有与 Pareto 前沿一致的多效表型效应。同样,流行多态性之间的上位效应与前沿平行。无性交配也与前沿对齐。当漂变或连锁较强时,对齐会减少,取而代之的是一种更复杂的结构,其中许多垂直的等位基因效应相互抵消。对齐的多态性结构允许交配产生后代,这些后代在物种可用的至少一个栖息地中成为优秀的多任务者的机会很大。本文是“细胞生物学中的自组织”主题特刊的一部分。