Cancer Biology Research Laboratory, Southern Connecticut State University New Haven, CT, USA.
Front Pharmacol. 2013 Jun 25;4:68. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00068. eCollection 2013.
U.S. SEER (Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results) data for age-adjusted mortality rates for all cancers combined for all races show only a modest overall 13% decline over the past 35 years. Moreover, the greatest contributor to cancer mortality is treatment-resistant metastatic disease. The accepted therapeutic paradigm for the past half-century for the treatment of advanced cancers has involved the use of systemic chemotherapy drugs cytotoxic for cycling cells (both normal and malignant) during DNA synthesis and/or mitosis. The failure of this therapeutic modality to achieve high-level, consistent rates of disease-free survival for some of the most common cancers, including tumors of the lung, colon breast, brain, melanoma, and others is the focus of this paper. A retrospective assessment of critical milestones in cancer chemotherapy indicates that most successful therapeutic regimens use cytotoxic cell cycle inhibitors in combined, maximum tolerated, dose-dense acute treatment regimens originally developed to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia and some lymphomas. Early clinical successes in this area led to their wholesale application to the treatment of solid tumor malignancies that, unfortunately, has not produced consistent, long-term high cure rates for many common cancers. Important differences in therapeutic sensitivity of leukemias/lymphomas versus solid tumors can be explained by key biological differences that define the treatment-resistant solid tumor phenotype. A review of these clinical outcome data in the context of recent developments in our understanding of drug resistance mechanisms characteristic of solid tumors suggests the need for a new paradigm for the treatment of chemotherapy-resistant cancers. In contrast to reductionist approaches, the systemic approach targets both microenvironmental and systemic factors that drive and sustain tumor progression. These systemic factors include dysregulated inflammatory and oxidation pathways shown to be directly implicated in the development and maintenance of the cancer phenotype. The paradigm stresses the importance of a combined preventive/therapeutic approach involving adjuvant chemotherapies that incorporate anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant therapeutics.
美国 SEER(监测、流行病学和最终结果)数据显示,所有种族的所有癌症综合年龄调整死亡率在过去 35 年中仅略有下降,约为 13%。此外,导致癌症死亡的最大因素是治疗耐药性转移性疾病。在过去半个世纪中,治疗晚期癌症的公认治疗模式一直涉及使用对处于 DNA 合成和/或有丝分裂周期中的细胞(包括正常和恶性细胞)具有细胞毒性的全身化疗药物。这种治疗模式未能为一些最常见的癌症(包括肺癌、结肠癌、乳腺癌、脑癌、黑色素瘤和其他癌症)实现高水平、一致的无病生存,这是本文的重点。对癌症化疗关键里程碑的回顾性评估表明,大多数成功的治疗方案使用细胞周期抑制剂,联合、最大耐受、剂量密集的急性治疗方案最初是为治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病和一些淋巴瘤而开发的。在这一领域的早期临床成功导致了它们在治疗实体瘤恶性肿瘤方面的广泛应用,但不幸的是,这并没有为许多常见癌症带来一致的长期高治愈率。白血病/淋巴瘤与实体瘤在治疗敏感性方面的重要差异可以用定义治疗耐药实体瘤表型的关键生物学差异来解释。在理解实体瘤耐药机制方面的最新进展背景下,对这些临床结果数据进行审查表明,需要为治疗化疗耐药癌症制定新的治疗模式。与还原论方法相反,系统方法靶向驱动和维持肿瘤进展的微环境和系统性因素。这些系统性因素包括失调的炎症和氧化途径,这些途径被证明直接参与癌症表型的发展和维持。该模式强调了联合预防/治疗方法的重要性,该方法包括联合化疗,其中包含抗炎和抗氧化治疗。