Weapons and Materials Research Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21005, USA.
J Comput Chem. 2013 Sep 30;34(25):2146-51. doi: 10.1002/jcc.23369. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
This study evaluates the importance of electrostatic corrections to earlier quantum-mechanically based methods to predict crystal densities of neutral and ionic molecular energetic materials. Our previous methods (B. M. Rice et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 10874) use the molecular volumes of the isolated molecule or formula unit to estimate the crystal density; this volume is defined to be that inside the quantum-mechanically determined 0.001 a.u. isosurface of electron density surrounding the isolated molecule. The electrostatic corrections to these volumetric estimates are based on features of the electrostatic potential mapped onto this isosurface of electron density, and have been parameterized using information from 180 neutral and 23 ionic CHNO molecular systems. The quality of the electrostatically corrected methods was assessed through application to 38 neutral and 48 ionic compounds not used in the parameterization. The root mean square (rms) percent deviation and average absolute error of predictions for the 38 neutral species relative to experiment are 2.7% and 0.035 g/cm(3), respectively, decreases of 0.9% and 0.015 g/cm(3) from the earlier predictions (3.6% and 0.050 g/cm(3), respectively). The rms percent deviation and average absolute error of predictions for the 48 ionic compounds relative to experiment are 3.7% and 0.045 g/cm(3), respectively, decreases of 2.6% and 0.043 g/cm(3) from the earlier predictions that used the formula unit volumes only. The results clearly show a significant improvement to the earlier method upon inclusion of electrostatic corrections.
本研究评估了静电修正对早期基于量子力学的方法预测中性和离子分子能质晶体密度的重要性。我们之前的方法(B.M.Rice 等人,J.Phys.Chem.A2007,111,10874)使用孤立分子或分子式的分子体积来估计晶体密度;该体积定义为在量子力学确定的围绕孤立分子的 0.001 埃等电子密度的等表面内的体积。这些体积估计的静电修正基于映射到该等电子密度表面上的静电势特征,并使用来自 180 个中性和 23 个离子 CHNO 分子系统的信息进行参数化。通过应用于 38 个未用于参数化的中性和 48 个离子化合物来评估静电修正方法的质量。相对于实验,38 种中性物质的预测的均方根(rms)百分比偏差和平均绝对误差分别为 2.7%和 0.035g/cm(3),分别比早期预测值降低了 0.9%和 0.015g/cm(3)(分别为 3.6%和 0.050g/cm(3))。相对于实验,48 种离子化合物的预测的 rms 百分比偏差和平均绝对误差分别为 3.7%和 0.045g/cm(3),分别比仅使用分子式体积的早期预测值降低了 2.6%和 0.043g/cm(3)。结果清楚地表明,在包含静电修正后,早期方法有了显著的改进。