Dipartimento di Scienze e Innovazione Tecnologica, Università del Piemonte Orientale Amedeo Avogadro, Viale T. Michel 11, I-15121 Alessandria, Italy.
Inorg Chem. 2013 Aug 5;52(15):8436-50. doi: 10.1021/ic400308a. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
The influence of dynamics on solution state structure is a widely overlooked consideration in chemistry. Variations in Gd(3+) chelate hydration with changing coordination geometry and dissociative water exchange kinetics substantially impact the effectiveness (or relaxivity) of monohydrated Gd(3+) chelates as T1-shortening contrast agents for MRI. Theory shows that relaxivity is highly dependent upon the Gd(3+)-water proton distance (rGdH), and yet this distance is almost never considered as a variable in assessing the relaxivity of a Gd(3+) chelate as a potential contrast agent. The consequence of this omission can be seen when considering the relaxivity of isomeric Gd(3+) chelates that exhibit different dissociative water exchange kinetics. The results described herein show that the relaxivity of a chelate with "optimal" dissociative water exchange kinetics is actually lower than that of an isomeric chelate with "suboptimal" dissociative water exchange. When the rate of molecular tumbling of these chelates is slowed, an approach that has long been understood to increase relaxivity, the observed difference in relaxivity is increased with the more rapidly exchanging ("optimal") chelate exhibiting lower relaxivity than the "suboptimally" exchanging isomer. The difference between the chelates arises from a non-field-dependent parameter: either the hydration number (q) or rGdH. For solution state Gd(3+) chelates, changes in the values of q and rGdH are indistinguishable. These parametric expressions simply describe the hydration state of the chelate--i.e., the number and position of closely associating water molecules. The hydration state (q/rGdH(6)) of a chelate is intrinsically linked to its dissociative water exchange rate kex, and the interrelation of these parameters must be considered when examining the relaxivity of Gd(3+) chelates. The data presented herein indicate that the changes in the hydration parameter (q/rGdH(6)) associated with changing dissociative water exchange kinetics has a profound effect on relaxivity and suggest that achieving the highest relaxivities in monohydrated Gd(3+) chelates is more complicated than simply "optimizing" dissociative water exchange kinetics.
动力学对溶液结构的影响是化学中一个被广泛忽视的考虑因素。随着配位几何形状的变化和可分离水交换动力学的变化,Gd(3+)螯合物的水合变化对一水合 Gd(3+)螯合物作为 MRI 的 T1 缩短对比剂的有效性(或弛豫率)有实质性的影响。理论表明,弛豫率高度依赖于 Gd(3+)与质子的距离(rGdH),但在评估 Gd(3+)螯合物作为潜在对比剂的弛豫率时,几乎从未考虑过这个距离作为一个变量。当考虑具有不同可分离水交换动力学的异构 Gd(3+)螯合物的弛豫率时,可以看到这种忽略的后果。本文所述的结果表明,具有“最佳”可分离水交换动力学的螯合物的弛豫率实际上低于具有“次优”可分离水交换的异构体螯合物的弛豫率。当这些螯合物的分子翻滚速度减慢时,长期以来人们一直认为这会增加弛豫率,但观察到的弛豫率差异随着更快速交换(“最佳”)的螯合物的增加而增加,其弛豫率低于“次优”交换的异构体。螯合物之间的差异来自于一个非磁场依赖的参数:水合数(q)或 rGdH。对于溶液状态的 Gd(3+)螯合物,q 和 rGdH 值的变化是无法区分的。这些参数表达式只是描述了螯合物的水合状态,即紧密结合的水分子的数量和位置。螯合物的水合状态(q/rGdH(6))与其可分离水交换速率 kex 内在相关,在检查 Gd(3+)螯合物的弛豫率时,必须考虑这些参数之间的关系。本文提供的数据表明,与可分离水交换动力学变化相关的水合参数(q/rGdH(6))的变化对弛豫率有深远的影响,并表明在一水合 Gd(3+)螯合物中实现最高弛豫率比简单地“优化”可分离水交换动力学更为复杂。