Costley Philippa L, East Christine E
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 11;2013(7):CD009241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009241.pub3.
The rate of operative deliveries (both caesarean sections, vacuum extractions and forceps), continues to rise throughout the world. These are associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity. The most common reasons for operative births in nulliparous women are labour dystocia (failure to progress), and non-reassuring fetal status. Epidural analgesia has been shown to slow the progress of labour, as well as increase the rate of instrumental deliveries. However, it is unclear whether the use of oxytocin in women with epidural analgesia results in a reduction in operative deliveries, and thereby reduces both maternal and fetal morbidity.
To determine whether augmentation of women using epidural analgesia with oxytocin will decrease the incidence of operative deliveries and thereby reduce fetal and maternal morbidity.
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 June 2013).
All published and unpublished randomised and quasi-randomised trials that compared augmentation with oxytocin of women in spontaneous labour with epidural analgesia versus intent to manage expectantly were included. Cluster-randomised trials were eligible for inclusion but none were identified.Cross-over study designs were unlikely to be relevant for this intervention, and we planned to exclude them if any were identified. We did not include results that were only available in published abstracts.
The two review authors independently assessed for inclusion the 16 studies identified as a result of the search strategy. Both review authors independently assessed the risk of bias for each included study. Both review authors independently extracted data. Data were checked for accuracy.
We included two studies, involving 319 women. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in either of the primary outcomes of caesarean section (risk ratio (RR) 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 2.12) or instrumental delivery (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.08). Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in any of the secondary outcomes for which data were available. This included Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (RR 3.06, 0.13 to 73.33), admission to neonatal intensive care unit (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.29 to 3.93), uterine hyperstimulation (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.80) and postpartum haemorrhage (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.58, 1.59).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference identified between women in spontaneous labour with epidural analgesia who were augmented with oxytocin, compared with those who received placebo. However, due to the limited number of women included in the studies, further research in the form of randomised controlled trials are required.
在全球范围内,手术分娩率(包括剖宫产、真空吸引术和产钳术)持续上升。这些手术分娩与孕产妇和新生儿的显著发病率相关。初产妇手术分娩最常见的原因是产程延长(进展不顺利)和胎儿状况不佳。已证实硬膜外镇痛会减缓产程,并增加器械助产率。然而,尚不清楚在接受硬膜外镇痛的女性中使用缩宫素是否会降低手术分娩率,从而降低孕产妇和胎儿的发病率。
确定对接受硬膜外镇痛的女性使用缩宫素加强宫缩是否会降低手术分娩率,从而降低胎儿和孕产妇的发病率。
我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2013年6月30日)。
所有已发表和未发表的随机及半随机试验均纳入,这些试验比较了对自然分娩且接受硬膜外镇痛的女性使用缩宫素加强宫缩与预期处理的效果。整群随机试验符合纳入标准,但未检索到。交叉研究设计可能与本干预措施无关,如果识别出此类研究,我们计划将其排除。我们未纳入仅在已发表摘要中可用的结果。
两位综述作者独立评估检索策略所识别出的16项研究是否符合纳入标准。两位综述作者独立评估每项纳入研究的偏倚风险。两位综述作者独立提取数据。对数据进行准确性检查。
我们纳入了两项研究,涉及319名女性。在剖宫产(风险比(RR)0.95,95%置信区间(CI)0.42至2.12)或器械助产(RR 0.88,95% CI 0.72至1.08)这两个主要结局方面,两组之间均无统计学显著差异。同样,在任何有数据的次要结局方面,两组之间也无统计学显著差异。这包括5分钟时阿氏评分低于7分(RR 3.06,0.13至73.33)、入住新生儿重症监护病房(RR 1.07,95% CI 0.29至3.93)、子宫过度刺激(RR 1.32,95% CI 0.97至1.80)和产后出血(RR 0.96,95% CI 0.58,1.59)。
与接受安慰剂的女性相比,对自然分娩且接受硬膜外镇痛的女性使用缩宫素加强宫缩,未发现有统计学显著差异。然而,由于纳入研究的女性数量有限,需要以随机对照试验的形式进行进一步研究。