Ferguson Danielle R, Bailey Michele M
Campus Animal Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2013;52(3):228-32.
This study assessed the reproductive performance of mice housed in 2 types of individually ventilated caging systems. Breeding pairs from 48 female and 24 male mice of 3 established transgenic mouse breeding colonies were placed in either a standard or disposable ventilated caging system. For 3 breeding cycles, the number of pups born, pup survival rate to weaning, time interval between litters, and pup weights were monitored for each breeding pair. Disposable and standard cages were maintained in the same location during breeding. Environmental parameters included intracage temperature, humidity, and ammonia and carbon dioxide levels and room light intensity and sound. Overall, 776 offspring were produced. Breeding performance did not differ significantly between the 2 cage types. By 11 wk of age, the weights of pups from both cage types were equivalent. The intracage temperature was 1.1 °F warmer and light intensity at the site of the nest was 34 lx dimmer in disposable cages than in standard caging. The difference in lighting likely was due to nest location; the nests in the disposable cages were at the back of the cages and away from the anterior air supply, whereas in standard caging, nests were at the front of the cages, with the air supply at the rear. Under these husbandry conditions, mice housed in disposable caging systems have comparable breeding performance to those housed in standard individually ventilated cages.
本研究评估了饲养在两种独立通风笼具系统中的小鼠的繁殖性能。从3个已建立的转基因小鼠繁殖群体中选取48只雌性和24只雄性小鼠组成繁殖对,将其置于标准或一次性通风笼具系统中。在3个繁殖周期内,监测每对繁殖小鼠的产仔数、幼崽断奶存活率、产仔间隔时间以及幼崽体重。繁殖期间,一次性笼子和标准笼子放置在同一位置。环境参数包括笼内温度、湿度、氨和二氧化碳水平以及房间光照强度和声音。总体而言,共产生了776只后代。两种笼具类型的繁殖性能没有显著差异。到11周龄时,两种笼具类型的幼崽体重相当。一次性笼子内的温度比标准笼具高1.1°F,且一次性笼子内巢穴处的光照强度比标准笼具暗34勒克斯。光照差异可能是由于巢穴位置不同;一次性笼子里的巢穴在笼子后部,远离前部供气口,而在标准笼具中,巢穴在笼子前部,供气口在后部。在这些饲养条件下,饲养在一次性笼具系统中的小鼠与饲养在标准独立通风笼中的小鼠具有相当的繁殖性能。