• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Women have significantly greater difference between central and peripheral arterial pressure compared with men: the Bogalusa Heart Study.与男性相比,女性中心动脉压与外周动脉压之间的差异显著更大:博加卢萨心脏研究。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2013 Sep-Oct;7(5):379-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
2
Geometrical and functional changes of left heart in adults with prehypertension and hypertension: a cross-sectional study from China.成人高血压前期和高血压患者左心的几何形态及功能变化:一项来自中国的横断面研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 May 28;16:114. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0286-3.
3
Methodological evaluation of the noninvasive estimation of central systolic blood pressure in nontreated patients: the Bogalusa Heart Study.未治疗患者中心收缩压无创估计的方法学评估:博加卢萨心脏研究
Blood Press Monit. 2017 Apr;22(2):95-100. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000224.
4
Joint Effect of Non-invasive Central Systolic Blood Pressure and Peripheral Systolic Blood Pressure on Incident Hypertension in a Chinese Community-based Population.无创中心收缩压与外周收缩压对中国社区人群高血压发病的联合影响。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 19;8(1):3229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21023-7.
5
Association of cardiovascular events with central systolic blood pressure: A systemic review and meta-analysis.中心收缩压与心血管事件的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024 Jul;26(7):747-756. doi: 10.1111/jch.14853. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
6
Relationship between fiducial points on the peripheral and central blood pressure waveforms: rate of rise of the central waveform is a determinant of peripheral systolic blood pressure.外周血压波形和中心血压波形的基准点之间的关系:中心波形的上升速率是外周收缩压的决定因素。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2021 Apr 1;320(4):H1601-H1608. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00818.2020. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
7
Prehypertension is Associated With Abnormalities of Cardiac Structure and Function in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.在社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究中,高血压前期与心脏结构和功能异常相关。
Am J Hypertens. 2016 May;29(5):568-74. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpv156. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
8
[Essential hypertension in children--risk factors and target organ damage].
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2011 Oct-Dec;115(4):1024-9.
9
Cardiovascular End Points and Mortality Are Not Closer Associated With Central Than Peripheral Pulsatile Blood Pressure Components.心血管终点和死亡率与中心性搏动性血压成分的关系比与周围性搏动性血压成分的关系更密切。
Hypertension. 2020 Aug;76(2):350-358. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14787. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
10
Can Pediatric Hypertension Criteria Be Simplified? A Prediction Analysis of Subclinical Cardiovascular Outcomes From the Bogalusa Heart Study.儿童高血压标准能否简化?来自博加卢萨心脏研究的亚临床心血管结局预测分析。
Hypertension. 2017 Apr;69(4):691-696. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08782. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Superior aortic strain and ventriculoarterial coupling in older women are moderately correlated with Framingham 10-year risk.老年女性的升主动脉应变与心室动脉耦合与弗明汉10年风险呈中度相关。
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2025 Jun 4;3(1):qyaf075. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyaf075. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Stronger Association Between Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Older Women than Men: The Hordaland Health Study.老年女性中血压与动脉僵硬度的关联比男性更强:霍达兰健康研究
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2025 May;32(3):353-361. doi: 10.1007/s40292-025-00719-8. Epub 2025 May 12.
3
The Relationship between the Mediterranean Diet and Vascular Stiffness, Metabolic Syndrome, and Its Components in People over 65 Years of Age.地中海饮食与 65 岁以上人群血管僵硬、代谢综合征及其成分的关系。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 12;16(20):3464. doi: 10.3390/nu16203464.
4
Sex-specific differences in risk factors, comorbidities, diagnostic challenges, optimal management, and prognostic outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A comprehensive literature review.射血分数保留的心力衰竭的性别特异性危险因素、合并症、诊断挑战、最佳治疗方法和预后结果的差异:全面文献综述。
Heart Fail Rev. 2024 Jan;29(1):235-256. doi: 10.1007/s10741-023-10369-4. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
5
Cardiometabolic risk factors, peripheral arterial tonometry and metformin in adults with type 1 diabetes participating in the REducing with MetfOrmin Vascular Adverse Lesions trial.1 型糖尿病患者的心脏代谢危险因素、外周动脉张力测定和二甲双胍与 REducing with MetfOrmin Vascular Adverse Lesions 试验。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2023 May-Jun;20(3):14791641231183634. doi: 10.1177/14791641231183634.
6
Sex differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: From traditional risk factors to sex-specific risk factors.射血分数保留的心力衰竭中的性别差异:从传统危险因素到性别特异性危险因素。
Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455057221140209. doi: 10.1177/17455057221140209.
7
Clusters of risk factors in metabolic syndrome and their influence on central blood pressure in a global study.全球研究中代谢综合征的危险因素聚集及其对中心血压的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 24;12(1):14409. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18094-y.
8
The Association of Dietary Intake with Arterial Stiffness and Vascular Ageing in a Population with Intermediate Cardiovascular Risk-A MARK Study.饮食摄入与中等心血管风险人群动脉僵硬度和血管老化的关联:一项 MARK 研究。
Nutrients. 2022 Jan 7;14(2):244. doi: 10.3390/nu14020244.
9
Associations Between Metabolic Profiles and Target-Organ Damage in Chinese Individuals With Primary Aldosteronism.原发性醛固酮增多症患者代谢特征与靶器官损害的相关性研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Sep 25;11:547356. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.547356. eCollection 2020.
10
Impact of Sex on Ventricular-Vascular Stiffness and Long-Term Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: TOPCAT Trial Substudy.性别对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者心室-血管僵硬及长期预后的影响:TOPCAT 试验亚组研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jul 2;8(13):e012190. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012190. Epub 2019 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Central blood pressure in the management of hypertension: soon reaching the goal?中心动脉压在高血压管理中的应用:即将达标?
J Hum Hypertens. 2013 Jul;27(7):405-11. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2013.23. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
2
Comparison of the SphygmoCor and Omron devices in the estimation of pressure amplification against the invasive catheter measurement.比较 SphygmoCor 和 Omron 设备在估计与有创导管测量相比的压力放大方面的性能。
J Hypertens. 2013 Jan;31(1):86-93. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835a8eca.
3
Estimation of central aortic systolic pressure using late systolic inflection of radial artery pulse and its application to vasodilator therapy.利用桡动脉脉搏晚期收缩切迹估测中心主动脉收缩压及其在血管扩张剂治疗中的应用。
J Hypertens. 2012 May;30(5):908-16. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283524910.
4
Premenopausal women have increased risk of hypertensive target organ damage compared with men of similar age.与同龄男性相比,绝经前女性发生高血压靶器官损害的风险增加。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Aug;20(8):1175-81. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2771. Epub 2011 Jun 24.
5
Relations of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry: the Strong Heart Study.中心血压和肱动脉血压与左心室肥厚和构型的关系:“强壮心脏研究”。
J Hypertens. 2010 Feb;28(2):384-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328333d228.
6
Role of the augmentation index in hypertension.增强指数在高血压中的作用。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 Feb;2(1):25-35. doi: 10.1177/1753944707086935.
7
Central but not brachial blood pressure predicts cardiovascular events in an unselected geriatric population: the ICARe Dicomano Study.中心血压而非肱动脉血压可预测未选择的老年人群心血管事件:ICARe迪科马诺研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jun 24;51(25):2432-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.031.
8
Relationship between radial and central arterial pulse wave and evaluation of central aortic pressure using the radial arterial pulse wave.桡动脉与中心动脉脉搏波之间的关系以及利用桡动脉脉搏波评估中心主动脉压
Hypertens Res. 2007 Mar;30(3):219-28. doi: 10.1291/hypres.30.219.
9
Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does brachial pressure: the Strong Heart Study.与肱动脉血压相比,中心血压与血管疾病及预后的关联更为密切:强心研究。
Hypertension. 2007 Jul;50(1):197-203. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089078. Epub 2007 May 7.
10
Prehypertension and cardiovascular disease risk in the Women's Health Initiative.女性健康倡议中的高血压前期与心血管疾病风险
Circulation. 2007 Feb 20;115(7):855-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.656850.

与男性相比,女性中心动脉压与外周动脉压之间的差异显著更大:博加卢萨心脏研究。

Women have significantly greater difference between central and peripheral arterial pressure compared with men: the Bogalusa Heart Study.

作者信息

Chester Rebecca, Sander Gary, Fernandez Camilo, Chen Wei, Berenson Gerald, Giles Thomas

机构信息

Tulane University School of Medicine, Tulane University Heart and Vascular Institute, New Orleans, LA.

出版信息

J Am Soc Hypertens. 2013 Sep-Oct;7(5):379-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jash.2013.05.007
PMID:23850194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3783561/
Abstract

Gender differences in the relationship between central and peripheral blood pressure (BP) are not well described. We sought to investigate gender differences between central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) and peripheral systolic blood pressure (pSBP) in adults in the Bogalusa study population. This study enrolled adults in a cross sectional survey conducted in 2007 to 2010. BP was measured with a standard cuff and Omron applanation tonometer. Data were available from 876 participants. Participants were 57.9% female and 42.1% male (mean age, 43.5 ± 4.4 years). Mean (standard deviation) for cSBP - pSBP was 1.0 (6.9) for males and 7.4 (5.2) for females (P < .001). Augmentation index (AI) was higher in women (men, 70.8 ± 14 vs. women: 85.5 ± 13; P < .01), as well as AI standardized to heart rate (HR) of 75 (AI@75; men, 68.5 ± 13 vs. women, 84.4 ± 11.8; P < .01). Female participants had greater difference between cSBP and pSBP than males. This suggests that, given similar peripheral BP, females might be at higher risk for developing target organ damage. Women in this study had higher AI, which may contribute to the difference found between cSBP and pSBP. These findings may explain why women have more age-related left ventricular hypertrophy, and poorer prognosis following myocardial infarction compared with males.

摘要

中心血压与外周血压(BP)之间的性别差异尚未得到充分描述。我们试图在博加卢萨研究人群中调查成年人中心收缩压(cSBP)与外周收缩压(pSBP)之间的性别差异。本研究纳入了2007年至2010年进行的横断面调查中的成年人。使用标准袖带和欧姆龙压平眼压计测量血压。有876名参与者的数据可用。参与者中女性占57.9%,男性占42.1%(平均年龄,43.5±4.4岁)。男性cSBP - pSBP的平均值(标准差)为1.0(6.9),女性为7.4(5.2)(P <.001)。女性的增强指数(AI)更高(男性,70.8±14 vs.女性:85.5±13;P <.01),以及标准化至心率(HR)为75时的AI(AI@75;男性,68.5±13 vs.女性,84.4±11.8;P <.01)。女性参与者的cSBP与pSBP之间的差异大于男性。这表明,在外周血压相似的情况下,女性发生靶器官损害的风险可能更高。本研究中的女性AI更高,这可能导致了cSBP与pSBP之间的差异。这些发现可能解释了为什么女性比男性有更多与年龄相关的左心室肥厚,以及心肌梗死后预后更差。