Mays Vickie M
Ethics Behav. 2012;22(6):419-430. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2012.730787.
In 1997 President William Clinton issued an apology to the living male survivors of the U.S. Public Health Syphilis Study at Tuskegee. While the apology became the focus for many, little attention has been paid going forward to two very important recommendations by President Clinton that accompanied the apology. President Clinton pointed out that it is through the remembering of the shameful past of the Syphilis Study at Tuskegee that we can build a better present and a better future for the . Second, President Clinton directed the Secretary of Health and Human Services to work in partnership with higher education to prepare training materials for medical researchers as well as postgraduate fellowships to train bioethicists to build on core ethical principles of respect for individuals, justice, and informed consent, and how to use these principles effectively in racial/ethnic minority populations, especially African Americans. This article examines bioethical research challenges left in the wake of the U.S. Public Health Syphilis Study at Tuskegee and the presidential apology. This manuscript raises for consideration the inclusion of these issues in health care reform and the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. It asks: What is the right or good thing to do? What are our obligations to one another? Two challenges are examined: 1) Conducting research with African Americans without knowledge of bioethics specific to this population; and 2) The ethical dilemma of conducting research that does not adequately take into account the diversity within the Black population that is a contributing factor in health disparities. Training and policy recommendations responsive to President Clinton's Apology are presented.
1997年,威廉·克林顿总统向塔斯基吉美国公共卫生梅毒研究的在世男性幸存者道歉。虽然这一道歉成为许多人关注的焦点,但克林顿总统在道歉时提出的两项非常重要的建议在后续却很少受到关注。克林顿总统指出,正是通过铭记塔斯基吉梅毒研究的可耻过去,我们才能为当下和未来创造更美好的局面。其次,克林顿总统指示卫生与公众服务部部长与高等教育机构合作,为医学研究人员编写培训材料,并设立研究生奖学金,以培养生物伦理学家,让他们基于尊重个人、公正和知情同意等核心伦理原则开展工作,并了解如何在种族/族裔少数群体,尤其是非裔美国人中有效运用这些原则。本文探讨了塔斯基吉美国公共卫生梅毒研究及总统道歉之后遗留的生物伦理研究挑战。这份手稿促使人们思考在医疗改革和《平价医疗法案》的实施过程中纳入这些问题。它提出:什么是正确或该做的好事?我们对彼此负有哪些义务?文中探讨了两个挑战:1)在不了解针对非裔美国人这一特定人群的生物伦理的情况下对他们进行研究;2)开展研究时没有充分考虑黑人人口内部的多样性,而这种多样性是导致健康差距的一个因素,这一研究存在的伦理困境。本文还提出了针对克林顿总统道歉的培训和政策建议。