Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency, Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone KT15 3NB, United Kingdom.
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Oct 1;112(1-2):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
The information provided by animal-health surveillance helps to reduce the impact of animal diseases. The widespread movement of animals and their products around the world results in an increasing risk that disease will spread. There is, therefore, a need for exchange between countries of comparable information about disease incidence; the exchange must be based on a common understanding of surveillance approaches and how surveillance systems are designed and implemented. Establishing agreed-upon definitions of surveillance terms would be a first step in achieving this standardisation, and will enhance transparency and confidence. To this end, a workshop was held with the aim of agreeing upon key terms and concepts for animal-health surveillance. In this paper, we describe the methods used at the workshop and summarise the discussions. A complete list of all the proposed definitions including lists of characteristics that can be used to describe surveillance activities and attributes for evaluation of surveillance is available in the workshop report (available at http://www.defra.gov.uk/ahvla-en/disease-control/surveillance/icahs-workshop/). Some important issues were highlighted during these discussions; of particular note was the importance of economic efficiency as an evaluation attribute. Some remaining inconsistencies in the proposed use of terms are highlighted (including the definition of 'risk-based surveillance' and the use of the term 'event-based surveillance').
动物健康监测提供的信息有助于减少动物疾病的影响。由于动物及其产品在世界各地的广泛流动,疾病传播的风险不断增加。因此,各国需要交流关于疾病发病率的可比信息;这种交流必须建立在对监测方法以及监测系统的设计和实施有共同理解的基础上。为了实现这一标准化,首先需要就监测术语达成商定的定义,这将提高透明度和信心。为此,举办了一次研讨会,旨在就动物健康监测的关键术语和概念达成一致意见。本文介绍了研讨会采用的方法,并总结了讨论情况。所有拟议定义的完整列表,包括可用于描述监测活动的特征列表和监测评估的属性列表,都可在研讨会报告中查阅(可在 http://www.defra.gov.uk/ahvla-en/disease-control/surveillance/icahs-workshop/ 获得)。在这些讨论中强调了一些重要问题;特别值得注意的是,经济效率作为评估属性的重要性。还强调了一些术语使用方面仍然存在的不一致之处(包括“基于风险的监测”的定义和“基于事件的监测”一词的使用)。