Suppr超能文献

利用家畜模型进行野生动物健康规划。

Utilising a livestock model for wildlife health planning.

作者信息

Patterson Stuart

机构信息

Wildlife Health, Pathobiology and Population Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2024 Nov 27;11:1466740. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1466740. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Health planning provides a structure for the application of epidemiological data to managed populations with the intention of maximising health and identifying targets for intervention. Whilst this is established practice in livestock health, such schemes are rarely applied to free-living wild animal populations. The health of wildlife is important for a variety of reasons including conservation, human health, and ecosystem health, and so it is recommended that a formalised health planning approach be adopted for wildlife, based upon advantages of livestock health schemes identified here. Six key strengths of livestock herd health plans are identified in that these plans are: (1) Outcome driven, (2) Structured and repeatable, (3) They can incorporate both health and welfare considerations and in doing so, establish multidisciplinary management teams, (4) Evidence-based allowing for the prioritisation of key risk factors, (5) Encompassing of both population and individual metrics, and (6) Offer the opportunity for accreditation schemes. The benefits highlighted have implications for both wildlife management and research agendas where the structured format of the health plans will highlight knowledge gaps. Challenges are acknowledged, and it is recognised that livestock health planning cannot simply be copied across to a wildlife context. However, the strengths identified are great enough that it is recommended that wildlife population health planning is developed for active management of individual populations, learning lessons from existing plans.

摘要

健康规划为将流行病学数据应用于受管理人群提供了一个框架,目的是最大化健康水平并确定干预目标。虽然这在牲畜健康方面是既定做法,但此类方案很少应用于自由生活的野生动物种群。野生动物的健康由于多种原因而很重要,包括保护、人类健康和生态系统健康,因此建议基于此处确定的牲畜健康方案的优势,为野生动物采用一种正式的健康规划方法。确定了牲畜群体健康计划的六个关键优势,即这些计划:(1) 以结果为导向,(2) 结构化且可重复,(3) 可以纳入健康和福利考量,并在此过程中建立多学科管理团队,(4) 基于证据,允许对关键风险因素进行优先排序,(5) 涵盖种群和个体指标,以及 (6) 为认证计划提供机会。所强调的这些益处对野生动物管理和研究议程都有影响,健康计划的结构化形式将凸显知识差距。认识到存在挑战,并且认识到不能简单地将牲畜健康规划照搬至野生动物领域。然而,所确定的优势足够显著,因此建议制定野生动物种群健康规划,以便对单个种群进行积极管理,并从现有计划中吸取经验教训。

相似文献

1
Utilising a livestock model for wildlife health planning.
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Nov 27;11:1466740. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1466740. eCollection 2024.
3
5
Relationship between burden of infection in ungulate populations and wildlife/livestock interfaces.
Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Jul;141(7):1522-35. doi: 10.1017/S0950268813000204. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
6
Minimizing animal welfare harms associated with predation management in agro-ecosystems.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2020 Aug;95(4):1097-1108. doi: 10.1111/brv.12601. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
7
Review: Livestock production increasingly influences wildlife across the globe.
Animal. 2018 Dec;12(s2):s372-s382. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118001349. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
9
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
10
Impacts of wildlife baiting and supplemental feeding on infectious disease transmission risk: a synthesis of knowledge.
Prev Vet Med. 2014 Mar 1;113(4):356-63. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative review of One Health and Indigenous approaches to wildlife research in Inuit Nunangat.
One Health. 2024 Jun 29;19:100846. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100846. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Health as Complete Well-Being: The WHO Definition and Beyond.
Public Health Ethics. 2023 Jul 27;16(3):210-218. doi: 10.1093/phe/phad017. eCollection 2023 Nov.
4
Herd health and production management visits on Canadian dairy cattle farms: Structure, goals, and topics discussed.
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Jul;104(7):7996-8008. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19833. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
5
What is epidemiology? Changing definitions of epidemiology 1978-2017.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 10;13(12):e0208442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208442. eCollection 2018.
6
Herd-level infectious disease surveillance of livestock populations using aggregate samples.
Anim Health Res Rev. 2018 Jun;19(1):53-64. doi: 10.1017/S1466252318000038. Epub 2018 May 21.
7
WILDLIFE HEALTH 2.0: BRIDGING THE KNOWLEDGE-TO-ACTION GAP.
J Wildl Dis. 2017 Jan;53(1):1-4. doi: 10.7589/2016-07-165. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
8
Current management practices and interventions prioritised as part of a nationwide mastitis control plan.
Vet Rec. 2016 Apr 30;178(18):449. doi: 10.1136/vr.103203. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
10
Approaches to canine health surveillance.
Canine Genet Epidemiol. 2014 Apr 16;1:2. doi: 10.1186/2052-6687-1-2. eCollection 2014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验