Eastwood Keith, Durrheim David, Merritt Tony, Massey Peter D, Huppatz Clare, Dalton Craig, Hope Kirsty, Moran Lucille, Speare Richard, Farrar Kris
Hunter New England Population Health, New South Wales, Australia . ; School of Public Health, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia .
Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2010 Sep 12;1(1):12-8. doi: 10.5365/WPSAR.2010.1.1.003. Print 2010 Oct.
Emergencies resulting from disease outbreaks and extreme environmental events present significant challenges for health services.
Preparing to effectively manage emergencies is a core activity in public health units. Field exercises support consolidation of biopreparedness by testing plans, identifying weaknesses, providing training opportunities and developing surge capacity.
An extended field exercise to test response to a novel influenza strain was conducted in New South Wales, Australia in September 2008, eight months before the influenza A(H1N1) 2009 pandemic emerged. Lasting four days and involving over 300 participants, the exercise was set in the early response phase with the staggered presentation of 41 cases to 36 emergency departments in the health area. An additional 150 contacts were written into a complex scenario to test the public health response.
The subsequent pandemic emergence in mid-2009 offered a unique opportunity to assess the field exercise format for disaster preparedness. Most roles were adequately tested with recognized benefit during the actual pandemic response. However, the exercise did not adequately challenge the public health planning team that synthesizes surveillance data and forecasts risk, nor did it identify planning issues that became evident during the subsequent pandemic.
Field exercises offer the opportunity to rigorously test public health emergency preparedness but can be expensive and labour-intensive. Our exercise provided effective and timely preparation for the influenza A(H1N1) 2009 pandemic but showed that more emphasis needs to be placed on the role and training of the public health planning team.
疾病暴发和极端环境事件引发的紧急情况给卫生服务带来了重大挑战。
做好有效应对紧急情况的准备是公共卫生单位的核心工作。实地演练通过检验计划、找出薄弱环节、提供培训机会和培养应急能力,有助于巩固生物防范工作。
2008年9月,在2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行出现前八个月,澳大利亚新南威尔士州开展了一次大规模实地演练,以测试对一种新型流感毒株的应对能力。该演练为期四天,有300多名参与者,设定在早期应对阶段,向该卫生区域的36个急诊科陆续呈现了41例病例。另外还编写了一个复杂场景,纳入150个接触者情况,以测试公共卫生应对措施。
2009年年中随后出现的大流行提供了一个独特机会,来评估实地演练在备灾方面的形式。在实际应对大流行期间,多数角色都得到了充分检验,并带来了公认的益处。然而,该演练对综合监测数据和预测风险的公共卫生规划团队的挑战不够充分,也未发现后续大流行期间变得明显的规划问题。
实地演练为严格测试公共卫生应急准备情况提供了机会,但可能成本高昂且耗费人力。我们的演练为2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行提供了有效且及时的准备,但表明需要更加重视公共卫生规划团队的作用和培训。