Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Dec;23(6):e361-72. doi: 10.1111/sms.12090. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
Using qualitative life-course and pathway analysis, this article explores the beliefs that serious club cyclists have about performance improvement, and what they think are appropriate and inappropriate ways of achieving it. We interviewed 11 cyclists from suburban clubs in Melbourne, Australia, and invited them to discuss their approach to training, racing, and supplementation. We found that each of the 11 cyclists were not only committed to the sport, but also paid a keen interest in bike technology and training regimes. In addition, they believed that supplement use was integral to meeting the physical and mental demands of their sport, even at club level. They also understood that supplement use, like training regimes, followed a sequential pathway where the accumulation of capacity, know-know, and knowledge, allowed progression to the next level of performance. And, like similar studies of club cycling in Europe, this cohort of cyclists balked at using banned substances, but also believed that in order to effectively transition to the elite - that is, professional - level, some additional supplement and drug-use was essential.
本文运用定性的生活轨迹和路径分析方法,探讨了严肃的自行车俱乐部运动员对提高运动成绩的信念,以及他们认为实现这一目标的适当和不适当的方法。我们采访了来自澳大利亚墨尔本郊区俱乐部的 11 名自行车运动员,并邀请他们讨论他们的训练、比赛和补充剂使用方法。我们发现,这 11 名自行车运动员不仅都热衷于这项运动,而且对自行车技术和训练方案也非常感兴趣。此外,他们认为补充剂的使用对于满足他们运动的身体和精神需求是必不可少的,即使是在俱乐部层面。他们还明白,补充剂的使用,就像训练方案一样,遵循着一个循序渐进的途径,在这个途径中,能力、知识和技能的积累使他们能够达到下一个更高的运动水平。而且,与欧洲类似的自行车俱乐部研究一样,这组自行车运动员对使用禁用物质表示反对,但也认为,为了有效地过渡到精英——也就是职业——水平,一些额外的补充剂和药物使用是必要的。