• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估测试质量:EFPA 审查模型的修订。

Assessing the quality of tests: revision of the EFPA review model.

机构信息

Dutch Association of Psychologists, Amsterdam, Países Bajos.

出版信息

Psicothema. 2013;25(3):283-91. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.97.

DOI:10.7334/psicothema2013.97
PMID:23910740
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diverse national and international organizations have been developing projects for many years to improve testing practices. The main goal of this paper is to present the revised model of the European Federation of Psychologists' Associations (EFPA) for the evaluation of the quality of tests. This model aims to provide test users with rigorous information about the theoretical, practical and psychometric characteristics of tests, in order to enhance their use.

METHOD

For the revision of the test review model, an EFPA task force was established, consisting of six European experts from different countries, who worked on the update of the previous European model, adapting it to the recent developments in the field of psychological and educational measurement.

RESULTS

The updated EFPA model provides for the comprehensive evaluation of tests. The first part describes test characteristics exhaustively, and in the second part, a quantitative and narrative evaluation of the most relevant psychometric characteristics of tests is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

A revision of the European model for the description and evaluation of psychological and educational tests is presented. The revised model is analyzed in light of recent developments in the field.

摘要

背景

多年来,不同的国家和国际组织一直在开展项目,以改进测试实践。本文的主要目的是介绍欧洲心理学家协会联合会(EFPA)修订后的测试质量评估模型。该模型旨在为测试使用者提供关于测试的理论、实践和心理计量学特征的严格信息,以增强其使用效果。

方法

为了修订测试审查模型,成立了一个由来自六个不同国家的六位欧洲专家组成的 EFPA 工作组,负责更新之前的欧洲模型,使其适应心理和教育测量领域的最新发展。

结果

更新后的 EFPA 模型提供了对测试的全面评估。第一部分详尽描述了测试的特征,第二部分则对测试最相关的心理计量学特征进行了定量和叙述性评估。

结论

提出了对心理和教育测试的描述和评估的欧洲模型的修订版。根据该领域的最新发展对修订后的模型进行了分析。

相似文献

1
Assessing the quality of tests: revision of the EFPA review model.评估测试质量:EFPA 审查模型的修订。
Psicothema. 2013;25(3):283-91. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.97.
2
[International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: second edition].[国际测试委员会测试翻译与改编指南:第二版]
Psicothema. 2013;25(2):151-7. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.24.
3
Health Psychology 2000:The Development of Professional Health Psychology: European Federation of Professional Psychologists' Associations (EFPPA) Task Force on Health Psychology Final Report.健康心理学 2000:专业健康心理学的发展:欧洲职业心理学家协会联合会(EFPPA)健康心理学工作组最终报告。
J Health Psychol. 1998 Jan;3(1):149-60. doi: 10.1177/135910539800300112.
4
The EFPA Test-Review Model: When Good Intentions Meet a Methodological Thought Disorder.欧洲心理学会测试-评审模型:当善意遭遇方法性思维障碍时
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Dec 31;8(1):5. doi: 10.3390/bs8010005. eCollection 2018 Jan.
5
Minimum standard and learning outcomes in physiology required by the Bologna process: the Federation of European Physiological Societies end-terms of physiology in a medical curriculum.博洛尼亚进程所要求的生理学最低标准和学习成果:欧洲生理学会联合会关于医学课程中生理学的结业要求。
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2010 Sep;200(1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02158.x.
6
Measurement: a beginner's guide.测量:初学者指南。
J Appl Meas. 2003;4(4):298-308.
7
Validity evidence based on test content.基于测试内容的效度证据。
Psicothema. 2014;26(1):100-7. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.256.
8
Perspectives on health promotion competencies and accreditation in Europe.欧洲健康促进能力与认证的观点
Glob Health Promot. 2009 Jun;16(2):21-31. doi: 10.1177/1757975909104101. Epub 2009 May 15.
9
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) consensus on science with treatment recommendations for pediatric and neonatal patients: pediatric basic and advanced life support.国际复苏联合委员会(ILCOR)关于儿科和新生儿患者的科学共识及治疗建议:儿科基础与高级生命支持
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):e955-77. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0206. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
10
Curriculum structure, content, learning and assessment in European undergraduate dental education - update 2010.欧洲本科牙医学教育的课程结构、内容、学习和评估-2010 年更新
Eur J Dent Educ. 2011 Aug;15(3):133-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2011.00699.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Portuguese translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Person-Centered Practice Inventory - Care.以患者为中心的实践量表-护理的葡萄牙语翻译、文化调适及验证
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0324286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324286. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the Italian version of the respiratory symptom experience scale (IT-RSES) in smokers and former smokers: a validation study.评估吸烟者和既往吸烟者中呼吸症状体验量表意大利语版(IT-RSES):一项验证研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 1;25(1):1600. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22824-y.
3
Dimensionality, Sensitivity and Specificity of Different Versions of the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Questionnaire/Measure in Clinical and Non-Clinical Populations.
不同版本的希罗姆-梅拉梅德职业倦怠问卷/量表在临床和非临床人群中的维度、敏感性和特异性
Stress Health. 2025 Feb;41(1):e70001. doi: 10.1002/smi.70001.
4
Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the Nurse Self-Concept Questionnaire (NSCQ) for Portuguese nursing students.葡萄牙护理专业学生护士自我概念问卷(NSCQ)的翻译、文化调适及效度验证
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jun 21;23(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02031-7.
5
Assessing suffering of patients on cancer treatment and of those no longer treated using ESAS-Total Care (TC).评估正在接受癌症治疗的患者和不再接受 ESAS-Total Care(TC)治疗的患者的痛苦。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Sep 16;31(10):579. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08035-4.
6
Instruments used to assess gender-affirming healthcare access: a scoping review protocol.用于评估性别肯定性医疗保健可及性的工具:一项范围综述方案
HRB Open Res. 2023 May 19;6:14. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13689.3. eCollection 2023.
7
Assessing Writing Motivation: a Systematic Review of K-5 Students' Self-Reports.评估写作动机:对幼儿园至五年级学生自我报告的系统综述
Educ Psychol Rev. 2023;35(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s10648-023-09732-6. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
8
Strengthening the Link between Vaccine Predispositions and Vaccine Advocacy through Certainty.通过确定性加强疫苗易感性与疫苗倡导之间的联系。
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 20;10(11):1970. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10111970.
9
The COVID-19 Student Stress Questionnaire: Validation in Spanish university students from health sciences.《COVID-19学生压力问卷:西班牙健康科学专业大学生中的效度验证》
Health Psychol Open. 2022 Nov 8;9(2):20551029221135293. doi: 10.1177/20551029221135293. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
10
Information concealment in palliative patients: Development and pilot study of a new scale for caregivers.姑息治疗患者的信息隐瞒: caregiver 新量表的制定与初步研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4504-e4512. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13854. Epub 2022 Jun 1.