Suppr超能文献

三种牙根管修复用硅酸钙基修复水泥的三维定量孔隙率特征。

Tridimensional quantitative porosity characterization of three set calcium silicate-based repair cements for endodontic use.

机构信息

Health Sciences Center (UNIGRANRIO), Grande Rio University, Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Microsc Res Tech. 2013 Oct;76(10):1093-8. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22270. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

Abstract

The aim of the this study was to quantitatively evaluate in three-dimensional (3D), the porosity degree of three improved silicate-based endodontic repair cements (iRoot BP Plus®, Biodentine®, and Ceramicrete) compared to a gold-standard calcium silicate bioactive cement (Pro Root® MTA). From each tested cement, four samples were prepared by a single operator following the manufacturer's instructions in terms of proportion, time, and mixing method, using cylindrical plastic split-ring moulds. The moulds were lubricated and the mixed cements were inserted with the aid of a cement spatula. The samples were scanned using a compact micro-CT device (Skyscan 1174, Bruker micro-CT, Kontich, Belgium) and the projection images were reconstructed into cross-sectional slices (NRecon v.1.6.9, Bruker micro-CT). From the stack of images, 3D models were rendered and the porosity parameters of each tested material were obtained after threshold definition by comparison with standard porosity values of Biodentine®. No statistically significant differences in the porosity parameters among the different materials were seen. Regarding total porosity, iRoot BP Plus® showed a higher percentage of total porosity (9.58%), followed by Biodentine® (7.09%), Pro Root® MTA (6.63%), and Ceramicrete (5.91%). Regarding closed porosity, Biodentine® presented a slight increase in these numbers compared to the other sealers. No significant difference in porosity between iRoot BP Plus®, Biodentine®, and Ceramicrete were seen. In addition, no significant difference in porosity between the new calcium silicate-containing repair cements and the gold-standard MTA were found.

摘要

本研究的目的是在三维(3D)定量评估三种改良硅酸盐基根管修复水泥(iRoot BP Plus®、Biodentine®和 Ceramicrete)的孔隙度程度,与金标准钙硅酸盐生物活性水泥(Pro Root® MTA)进行比较。从每种测试的水泥中,由一名操作员按照制造商的说明,在比例、时间和混合方法方面,使用圆柱形塑料分体环模具制备四个样品。模具经过润滑,混合水泥在水泥刮刀的帮助下插入。使用紧凑型微 CT 设备(Skyscan 1174,Bruker micro-CT,比利时 Kontich)对样品进行扫描,将投影图像重建为横截面切片(NRecon v.1.6.9,Bruker micro-CT)。从图像堆栈中,渲染 3D 模型,并通过与 Biodentine®的标准孔隙率值进行比较来定义阈值后,获得每种测试材料的孔隙率参数。不同材料之间的孔隙率参数没有统计学上的显著差异。关于总孔隙率,iRoot BP Plus®显示出更高的总孔隙率百分比(9.58%),其次是 Biodentine®(7.09%)、Pro Root® MTA(6.63%)和 Ceramicrete(5.91%)。关于闭孔率,与其他密封剂相比,Biodentine®的这些数字略有增加。iRoot BP Plus®、Biodentine®和 Ceramicrete 之间的孔隙率没有显著差异。此外,新的含硅酸钙修复水泥与金标准 MTA 之间的孔隙率也没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验