Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Stavanger University Hospital, 4068 Stavanger, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
Resuscitation. 2013 Nov;84(11):1487-93. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) Advisory Statement on Education and Resuscitation in 2003 included a hypothetical formula--'the formula for survival' (FfS)--whereby three interactive factors, guideline quality (science), efficient education of patient caregivers (education) and a well-functioning chain of survival at a local level (local implementation), form multiplicands in determining survival from resuscitation. In May 2006, a symposium was held to discuss the validity of the formula for survival hypothesis and to investigate the influence of each of the multiplicands on survival. This commentary combines the output from this symposium with an updated illustration of the three multiplicands in the FfS using rapid response systems (RRS) for medical science, therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for local implementation, and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for educational efficiency. International differences between hospital systems made it difficult to assign a precise value for the multiplicand medical science using RRS as an example. Using bystander CPR as an example for the multiplicand educational efficiency, it was also difficult to provide a precise value, mainly because of differences between compression-only and standard CPR. The local implementation multiplicand (exemplified by therapeutic hypothermia) is probably the easiest to improve, and is likely to have the most immediate improvement in observed survival outcome in most systems of care. Despite the noted weaknesses, we believe that the FfS will be useful as a mental framework when trying to improve resuscitation outcome in communities worldwide.
2003 年,国际复苏联合会(ILCOR)咨询声明中的教育和复苏部分包含了一个假设公式——“生存公式”(FfS),其中三个相互作用的因素,指南质量(科学)、患者照护者的有效教育(教育)和当地生存链的良好运作(当地实施),形成了决定复苏后生存率的乘数。2006 年 5 月,举行了一次专题讨论会,讨论生存公式假设的有效性,并研究每个乘数对生存率的影响。本评论结合了该专题讨论会的结果,并使用医疗科学的快速反应系统(RRS)、当地实施的治疗性低温(TH)和旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)对 FfS 中的三个乘数进行了更新说明。由于医院系统之间存在国际差异,因此使用 RRS 作为医疗科学的乘数,很难给出一个精确的值。以旁观者 CPR 作为教育效率的乘数为例,也很难给出一个精确的值,主要是因为单纯按压和标准 CPR 之间存在差异。本地实施乘数(以治疗性低温为例)可能是最容易改进的,并且可能在大多数医疗系统中对观察到的生存率结果的改善最直接。尽管存在上述弱点,但我们相信,FfS 将作为一个思维框架,有助于在全球范围内提高社区复苏结果。