Division of Clinical Neurology, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e70143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070143. Print 2013.
Coordinate based meta-analysis (CBMA) is widely used to find regions of consistent activation across fMRI studies that have been selected for their functional relevance to a given hypothesis. Only reported coordinates (foci), and a model of their spatial uncertainty, are used in the analysis. Results are clusters of foci where multiple studies have reported in the same spatial region, indicating functional relevance. There are several published methods that perform the analysis in a voxel-wise manner, resulting in around 10(5) statistical tests, and considerable emphasis placed on controlling the risk of type 1 statistical error. Here we address this issue by dramatically reducing the number of tests, and by introducing a new false discovery rate control: the false cluster discovery rate (FCDR). FCDR is particularly interpretable and relevant to the results of CBMA, controlling the type 1 error by limiting the proportion of clusters that are expected under the null hypothesis. We also introduce a data diagnostic scheme to help ensure quality of the analysis, and demonstrate its use in the example studies. We show that we control the false clusters better than the widely used ALE method by performing numerical experiments, and that our clustering scheme results in more complete reporting of structures relevant to the functional task.
基于坐标的荟萃分析(CBMA)被广泛用于在 fMRI 研究中发现与给定假设具有功能相关性的一致激活区域。分析中仅使用已报告的坐标(焦点)及其空间不确定性模型。结果是多个研究在同一空间区域报告的焦点簇,表明具有功能相关性。有几种已发表的方法以体素为基础进行分析,导致大约进行了 10^5 次统计检验,并非常强调控制第一类统计错误的风险。在这里,我们通过大幅减少检验次数并引入新的假阳性发现率控制方法(即虚假聚类发现率 FCDR)来解决这个问题。FCDR 特别适用于 CBMA 的结果,通过限制在零假设下预期的簇比例来控制第一类错误。我们还引入了一种数据诊断方案来帮助确保分析的质量,并在示例研究中展示了其使用。我们通过数值实验表明,与广泛使用的 ALE 方法相比,我们可以更好地控制假阳性聚类,并且我们的聚类方案导致更完整地报告与功能任务相关的结构。