Suppr超能文献

通过短信进行哮喘控制测试:它能成为评估哮喘控制的工具吗?

Asthma control test via text messaging: could it be a tool for evaluating asthma control?

作者信息

Uysal Mehmet Atilla, Mungan Dilsad, Yorgancioglu Arzu, Yildiz Fusun, Akgun Metin, Gemicioglu Bilun, Turktas Haluk

机构信息

Department of Chest Diseases, Yedikule Training and Research Hospital for Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery , Istanbul , Turkey .

出版信息

J Asthma. 2013 Dec;50(10):1083-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.832294. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Originally, the Asthma Control Test (ACT) was designed for English-speaking patients using a paper-and-pencil format. The Turkish version of the ACT was recently validated. This article compares the paper-and-pencil and web-based texting formats of the Turkish version of the ACT and evaluates the compatibility of these ACT scores with GINA-based physician assessments of asthma control.

METHODS

This multicentre prospective study included 431 asthma patients from outpatient clinics in Turkey. The patients were randomized into a paper-and-pencil group (n = 220) and a text messaging group (n = 211). Patients completed the ACT at Visit 1, after 10 ± 2 days, and at 5 ± 1 week to demonstrate the reliability and responsiveness of the test. At each visit, physicians assessed patients' asthma control levels.

RESULTS

The ACT administered via texting showed an internal consistency of 0.82. For the texting group, we found a significant correlation between the ACT and physician assessments at Visit 1 (r = 0.60, p < 0.001). The AUC was 0.87, with a sensitivity of 78.0% and a specificity of 77.5% for a score of ≤19 for screening "uncontrolled" asthma in the texting group.

CONCLUSION

When the Turkish version of the ACT was administered via either the paper-and-pencil or text messaging test, scores were closely associated with physician assessments of asthma control.

摘要

引言

最初,哮喘控制测试(ACT)是为说英语的患者设计的纸质笔答形式。ACT的土耳其语版本最近得到了验证。本文比较了ACT土耳其语版本的纸质笔答和基于网络的短信形式,并评估了这些ACT分数与基于全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)的医生对哮喘控制评估的兼容性。

方法

这项多中心前瞻性研究纳入了来自土耳其门诊诊所的431名哮喘患者。患者被随机分为纸质笔答组(n = 220)和短信组(n = 211)。患者在第1次就诊时、10±2天后以及5±1周时完成ACT,以证明该测试的可靠性和反应性。每次就诊时,医生评估患者的哮喘控制水平。

结果

通过短信方式进行的ACT显示内部一致性为0.82。对于短信组,我们发现在第1次就诊时ACT与医生评估之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.60,p < 0.001)。在短信组中,对于筛查“未控制”哮喘,ACT评分为≤19时,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.87,敏感性为78.0%,特异性为77.5%。

结论

当通过纸质笔答或短信测试方式进行ACT土耳其语版本测试时,分数与医生对哮喘控制的评估密切相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验