• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统回顾淋巴水肿的护理提供模式和经济分析:对卫生政策的影响(2004-2011 年)。

A systematic review of care delivery models and economic analyses in lymphedema: health policy impact (2004-2011).

出版信息

Lymphology. 2013 Mar;46(1):27-41.

PMID:23930439
Abstract

A project of the American Lymphedema Framework Project (ALFP), this review seeks to examine the policy and economic impact of caring for patients with lymphedema, a common side effect of cancer treatment. This review is the first of its kind undertaken to investigate, coordinate, and streamline lymphedema policy initiatives in the United States with potential applicability worldwide. As part of a large scale literature review aiming to systematically evaluate the level of evidence of contemporary peer-reviewed lymphedema literature (2004 to 2011), publications on care delivery models, health policy, and economic impact were retrieved, summarized, and evaluated by a team of investigators and clinical experts. The review substantiates lymphedema education models and clinical models implemented at the community, health care provider, and individual level that improve delivery of care. The review exposes the lack of economic analysis related to lymphedema. Despite a dearth of evidence, efforts towards policy initiatives at the federal and state level are underway. These initiatives and the evidence to support them are examined and recommendations for translating these findings into clinical practice are made. Medical and community-based disease management interventions, taking on a public approach, are effective delivery models for lymphedema care and demonstrate great potential to improve cancer survivorship care. Efforts to create policy at the federal, state, and local level should target implementation of these models. More research is needed to identify costs associated with the treatment of lymphedema and to model the cost outlays and potential cost savings associated with comprehensive management of chronic lymphedema.

摘要

这是美国淋巴水肿框架项目(ALFP)的一个项目,该研究旨在审查护理淋巴水肿患者的政策和经济影响,淋巴水肿是癌症治疗的常见副作用。这是首次进行此类审查,以调查、协调和简化美国的淋巴水肿政策举措,这些举措可能在全球范围内具有适用性。作为一项旨在系统评估当代同行评议淋巴水肿文献(2004 年至 2011 年)证据水平的大规模文献综述的一部分,检索、总结和评估了护理模式、卫生政策和经济影响方面的出版物,由一组调查人员和临床专家。该研究证实了在社区、医疗保健提供者和个人层面实施的淋巴水肿教育模式和临床模式可改善护理服务。该研究揭示了与淋巴水肿相关的经济分析的缺乏。尽管证据不足,但联邦和州一级的政策倡议工作仍在进行中。这些倡议及其支持证据得到了审查,并就将这些发现转化为临床实践提出了建议。采取公共方法的医疗和社区疾病管理干预措施是淋巴水肿护理的有效交付模式,并且具有改善癌症生存护理的巨大潜力。在联邦、州和地方各级制定政策的努力应针对这些模式的实施。需要开展更多的研究,以确定与治疗淋巴水肿相关的成本,并建立全面管理慢性淋巴水肿相关费用支出和潜在节省的模型。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of care delivery models and economic analyses in lymphedema: health policy impact (2004-2011).系统回顾淋巴水肿的护理提供模式和经济分析:对卫生政策的影响(2004-2011 年)。
Lymphology. 2013 Mar;46(1):27-41.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Comparison of the effectiveness of inhaler devices in asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease: a systematic review of the literature.吸入装置在哮喘和慢性阻塞性气道疾病中的有效性比较:文献系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(26):1-149. doi: 10.3310/hta5260.
5
NIH Consensus Statement on Management of Hepatitis C: 2002.美国国立卫生研究院关于丙型肝炎管理的共识声明:2002年。
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19(3):1-46.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Complementary, alternative, and other noncomplete decongestive therapy treatment methods in the management of lymphedema: a systematic search and review.辅助、替代及其他非完全性消肿治疗方法在淋巴水肿管理中的应用:系统检索与综述
PM R. 2014 Mar;6(3):250-74; quiz 274. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of the Efficacy of Lymphedema Decongestive Therapy.淋巴水肿减压治疗疗效的预测因素
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 27;61(2):231. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020231.
2
Surgical treatments of lymphedema-a literature review on robot-assisted lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA).淋巴水肿的外科治疗——机器人辅助淋巴静脉吻合术(LVA)的文献综述
Gland Surg. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):1066-1075. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-22. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
Cost of a lymphedema treatment mandate - 16 years of experience in the Commonwealth of Virginia.淋巴水肿治疗授权的成本——弗吉尼亚联邦的16年经验
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Jul 23;12(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00388-6.
4
Feasibility of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Examining a Multidimensional Intervention in Women with Gynecological Cancer at Risk of Lymphedema.妇科癌症淋巴水肿风险女性多维干预的初步随机对照试验可行性研究。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Jan 13;28(1):455-470. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28010048.
5
The Quality of Life and Psychosocial Implications of Cancer-Related Lower-Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review of the Literature.癌症相关下肢淋巴水肿的生活质量及心理社会影响:文献系统综述
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 2;9(10):3200. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103200.
6
The impact of arm lymphedema on healthcare utilization during long-term breast cancer survivorship: a population-based cohort study.手臂淋巴水肿对长期乳腺癌生存者医疗保健利用的影响:基于人群的队列研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2020 Jun;14(3):347-355. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00851-0. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
7
What are the economic burden and costs associated with the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema? A systematic review.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的治疗费用和经济负担有哪些?一项系统评价。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Feb;28(2):439-449. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05101-8. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
8
Lymphedema Impact and Prevalence International Study: The Canadian Data.淋巴水肿影响与患病率国际研究:加拿大数据。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2019 Apr;17(2):178-186. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2019.0014.
9
The Development and Validation of the LIMPRINT Methodology.LIMPRINT方法的开发与验证
Lymphat Res Biol. 2019 Apr;17(2):127-134. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0081.
10
The Concept of Chronic Edema-A Neglected Public Health Issue and an International Response: The LIMPRINT Study.慢性水肿的概念——一个被忽视的公共卫生问题及国际应对措施:LIMPRINT研究
Lymphat Res Biol. 2019 Apr;17(2):121-126. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0085.