• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我想帮助你,但我不确定原因:目光提示会引发利他性给予。

I want to help you, but I am not sure why: gaze-cuing induces altruistic giving.

作者信息

Rogers Robert D, Bayliss Andrew P, Szepietowska Anna, Dale Laura, Reeder Lydia, Pizzamiglio Gloria, Czarna Karolina, Wakeley Judi, Cowen Phillip J, Tipper Steven P

机构信息

School of Psychology.

School of Psychology, University of East Anglia.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):763-77. doi: 10.1037/a0033677. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1037/a0033677
PMID:23937180
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3970851/
Abstract

Detecting subtle indicators of trustworthiness is highly adaptive for moving effectively amongst social partners. One powerful signal is gaze direction, which individuals can use to inform (or deceive) by looking toward (or away from) important objects or events in the environment. Here, across 5 experiments, we investigate whether implicit learning about gaze cues can influence subsequent economic transactions; we also examine some of the underlying mechanisms. In the 1st experiment, we demonstrate that people invest more money with individuals whose gaze information has previously been helpful, possibly reflecting enhanced trust appraisals. However, in 2 further experiments, we show that other mechanisms driving this behavior include obligations to fairness or (painful) altruism, since people also make more generous offers and allocations of money to individuals with reliable gaze cues in adapted 1-shot ultimatum games and 1-shot dictator games. In 2 final experiments, we show that the introduction of perceptual noise while following gaze can disrupt these effects, but only when the social partners are unfamiliar. Nonconscious detection of reliable gaze cues can prompt altruism toward others, probably reflecting the interplay of systems that encode identity and control gaze-evoked attention, integrating the reinforcement value of gaze cues.

摘要

察觉可信度的微妙指标对于在社交伙伴中有效行动具有高度适应性。一个强大的信号是目光方向,个体可以通过看向(或远离)环境中的重要物体或事件来传递信息(或欺骗)。在此,通过5个实验,我们研究了对目光线索的隐性学习是否会影响后续的经济交易;我们还考察了一些潜在机制。在第一个实验中,我们证明人们会向那些目光信息先前有帮助的个体投入更多资金,这可能反映了信任评估的增强。然而,在另外两个实验中,我们表明驱动这种行为的其他机制包括公平义务或(痛苦的)利他主义,因为在适应性的一次性最后通牒博弈和一次性独裁者博弈中,人们也会向具有可靠目光线索的个体做出更慷慨的出价和金钱分配。在最后两个实验中,我们表明在跟随目光时引入感知噪声会扰乱这些效应,但仅当社交伙伴不熟悉时才会如此。对可靠目光线索的无意识察觉会促使对他人的利他行为,这可能反映了编码身份和控制目光引发的注意力的系统之间的相互作用,整合了目光线索的强化价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfca/3970851/08e9dd52c4a6/xge_143_2_763_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfca/3970851/4d08691c1e23/xge_143_2_763_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfca/3970851/c861ffa157c7/xge_143_2_763_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfca/3970851/d885a1736645/xge_143_2_763_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfca/3970851/08e9dd52c4a6/xge_143_2_763_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfca/3970851/4d08691c1e23/xge_143_2_763_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfca/3970851/c861ffa157c7/xge_143_2_763_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfca/3970851/d885a1736645/xge_143_2_763_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfca/3970851/08e9dd52c4a6/xge_143_2_763_fig4a.jpg

相似文献

1
I want to help you, but I am not sure why: gaze-cuing induces altruistic giving.我想帮助你,但我不确定原因:目光提示会引发利他性给予。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):763-77. doi: 10.1037/a0033677. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
2
The effect of visual cues on performance in the ultimatum game in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.视觉线索对自闭症谱系障碍个体在最后通牒博弈中表现的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jan;259:176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.013. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
3
Golden gazes: Gaze direction and emotional context promote prosocial behavior by increasing attributions of empathy and perspective-taking.金色凝视:注视方向和情绪背景通过增加同理心和换位思考的归因来促进亲社会行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 Apr;126(4):643-659. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000437. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
4
Predictive gaze cues and personality judgments: Should eye trust you?预测性注视线索与个性判断:眼睛应该让你信任吗?
Psychol Sci. 2006 Jun;17(6):514-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01737.x.
5
Examining the durability of incidentally learned trust from gaze cues.审视从目光线索中偶然习得的信任的持久性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Oct;70(10):2060-2075. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1220609. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Associations between empathy and altruistic sharing behavior in Chinese adults.中国人的同理心与利他主义分享行为之间的关联。
J Gen Psychol. 2019 Jan-Mar;146(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2018.1510826.
7
Incidental learning of group trust: Predictive gaze cue matters.偶然学习群体信任:预测性注视线索很重要。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 8;10(1):7789. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64719-5.
8
Re-encountering individuals who previously engaged in joint gaze modulates subsequent gaze cueing.再次遇到之前有过共同注视行为的个体,会调节随后的注视提示。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Feb;42(2):271-84. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000159. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
9
BMI is not related to altruism, fairness, trust or reciprocity: Experimental evidence from the field and the lab.体重指数与利他主义、公平、信任或互惠无关:来自实地和实验室的实验证据。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Mar 15;156:79-93. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
10
Gaze following in multiagent contexts: Evidence for a quorum-like principle.多主体情境中的目光追随:群体感应样原则的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2260-2266. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1464-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Imagined eye cue increased altruistic behavior toward charity instead of stranger.想象中的眼神暗示增加了对慈善机构而非陌生人的利他行为。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 11;16:1503766. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1503766. eCollection 2025.
2
Guilt-inducing interaction with others modulates subsequent attentional orienting via their gaze.与他人产生内疚的相互作用会通过他们的目光调节随后的注意力定向。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 1;13(1):5348. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32283-3.
3
Rapid detection of social interactions is the result of domain general attentional processes.

本文引用的文献

1
Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.在个体内设计中使用置信区间。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Dec;1(4):476-90. doi: 10.3758/BF03210951.
2
Equitable decision making is associated with neural markers of intrinsic value.公平决策与内在价值的神经标记物有关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 6;108(49):19761-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112324108. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
3
Lateral OFC activity predicts decision bias due to first impressions during ultimatum games.外侧眶额皮质活动预测了最后通牒博弈中第一印象导致的决策偏差。
社会互动的快速检测是领域通用注意力过程的结果。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0258832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258832. eCollection 2022.
4
Standing out from the crowd: Both cue numerosity and social information affect attention in multi-agent contexts.脱颖而出:线索数量和社会信息在多主体情境中均影响注意。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Oct;74(10):1737-1746. doi: 10.1177/17470218211013028. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
5
Affective evaluation of images influences personality judgments through gaze perception.通过注视感知,图像的情感评价会影响人格判断。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0241351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241351. eCollection 2020.
6
Investigating the formation and consolidation of incidentally learned trust.探究偶然习得信任的形成与巩固。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Apr;46(4):684-698. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000752. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
7
Seeing eye-to-eye: Social gaze interactions influence gaze direction identification.看法一致:社会注视互动会影响注视方向识别。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Nov;81(8):2755-2765. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01671-1.
8
Are Rich People Perceived as More Trustworthy? Perceived Socioeconomic Status Modulates Judgments of Trustworthiness and Trust Behavior Based on Facial Appearance.富人是否被认为更值得信赖?感知到的社会经济地位会基于面部外观调节对可信度和信任行为的判断。
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 10;9:512. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00512. eCollection 2018.
9
The role of emotion in learning trustworthiness from eye-gaze: Evidence from facial electromyography.情绪在通过眼神注视学习可信度方面的作用:来自面部肌电图的证据。
Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Jan-Oct;7(1-4):82-102. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1085374. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
10
Measuring autistic traits in the general population: a systematic review of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a nonclinical population sample of 6,900 typical adult males and females.在普通人群中测量自闭症特质:对6900名典型成年男性和女性的非临床人群样本进行自闭症谱系商数(AQ)的系统综述。
Mol Autism. 2015 Jan 14;6:2. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-6-2. eCollection 2015.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb;24(2):428-39. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00136. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
4
Behavioral and neural properties of social reinforcement learning.社会强化学习的行为和神经特性。
J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 14;31(37):13039-45. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2972-11.2011.
5
The influence of emotion regulation on social interactive decision-making.情绪调节对社会互动决策的影响。
Emotion. 2010 Dec;10(6):815-21. doi: 10.1037/a0020069.
6
Predictive gaze cues affect face evaluations: The effect of facial emotion.预测性注视线索影响面部评价:面部表情的作用。
Eur J Cogn Psychol. 2009 Nov;21(7):1072-1084. doi: 10.1080/09541440802553490. Epub 2009 Jan 20.
7
Gaze cueing elicited by emotional faces is influenced by affective context.由情绪化面孔引发的注视线索受情感背景的影响。
Vis cogn. 2010 Sep;18(8):1214-1232. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2010.484657. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
8
Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: male facial width and trustworthiness.合作与信任的有效面部线索:男性面部宽度与可信度。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):349-54. doi: 10.1177/0956797610362647. Epub 2010 Feb 16.
9
Mental-state attribution drives rapid, reflexive gaze following.心理状态归因驱动快速、反射性的视线追随。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Apr;72(3):695-705. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.3.695.
10
Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review.熟悉面孔和陌生面孔识别:综述。
Memory. 2009 Jul;17(5):577-96. doi: 10.1080/09658210902976969.