Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Immunol Rev. 2013 Sep;255(1):182-96. doi: 10.1111/imr.12085.
The host response to viruses includes multiple cell types that have regulatory function. Most information focuses on CD4(+) regulatory T cells that express the transcription factor Foxp3(+) (Tregs), which are the topic of this review. We explain how viruses through specific and non-specific means can trigger the response of thymus-derived natural Tregs as well as induce Tregs. The latter derive under appropriate stimulation conditions either from uncommitted precursors or from differentiated cells that convert to become Tregs. We describe instances where Tregs appear to limit the efficacy of antiviral protective immunity and other, perhaps more common, immune-mediated inflammatory conditions, where the Tregs function to limit the extent of tissue damage that occurs during a virus infection. We discuss the controversial roles that Tregs may play in the pathogenesis of human immunodeficiency and hepatitis C virus infections. The issue of plasticity is discussed, as this may result in Tregs losing their protective function when present in inflammatory environments. Finally, we mention approaches used to manipulate Treg numbers and function and assess their current value and likely future success to manage the outcome of virus infection, especially those that are responsible for chronic tissue damage.
宿主对病毒的反应包括具有调节功能的多种细胞类型。大多数信息都集中在表达转录因子 Foxp3(+)的 CD4(+)调节性 T 细胞(Tregs)上,这是本综述的主题。我们解释了病毒如何通过特异性和非特异性手段触发来自胸腺衍生的天然 Tregs 的反应,以及诱导 Tregs 的反应。后者在适当的刺激条件下,要么来自未分化的前体,要么来自分化的细胞,后者转化为 Tregs。我们描述了 Tregs 似乎限制抗病毒保护性免疫的有效性的情况,以及其他可能更常见的免疫介导的炎症情况,在这些情况下,Tregs 的功能是限制病毒感染期间发生的组织损伤的程度。我们讨论了 Tregs 在人类免疫缺陷和丙型肝炎病毒感染发病机制中可能发挥的有争议的作用。讨论了可塑性的问题,因为当 Tregs 存在于炎症环境中时,它们可能会失去其保护功能。最后,我们提到了用于操纵 Treg 数量和功能的方法,并评估了它们目前的价值和可能的未来成功,以管理病毒感染的结果,特别是那些导致慢性组织损伤的病毒感染。