Suppr超能文献

手术室无菌器械的存放:使用水平单向气流系统可达到同等或更高的保护效果。

Laying-up of sterile instruments in the operating theatre: equal or superior protection by using a horizontal unidirectional air flow system.

机构信息

TNO Dutch Centre for Health Assets, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2013 Oct;85(2):125-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A system for the preparation of sterilized instruments with unidirectional horizontal air flow (UDHF) has several advantages over a unidirectional down flow system (UDDF). The advantages are based on the installation of the system being more flexible and easier to use, no cooling of the air flow being necessary and less air being needed for circulation, resulting in reduced energy use.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine whether a system with UDHF performs equal or superior to a system with UDDF in terms of prevention of contamination of the air (the presence of particles and micro-organisms) during the laying-up process.

METHODS

The degree of protection (DP) offered by two UDHF system variants and two UDDF system variants was determined for several static set-ups and a dynamic simulation of the process. In addition to determining the level of protection for several categories of particle size, colony-forming units (CFU) were also measured during process simulations.

FINDINGS

When maximum protection (no particles present) is considered, the UDHF systems performed significantly better than the UDDF systems for particles ≥2.5μm. When particles were present, there was no significant difference between systems for particles ≥0.3 and ≥0.5μm. However, the performance of the UDHF system was superior to that of the UDDF system (DP) for particles ≥1.0μm representing the bacteria-carrying particles. During the process measurements, no CFU were found with the UDDF system in 64% of the measurements, compared with 90% for the UDHF system (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The UDHF system offers equal or superior protection to the UDDF system against contamination of the clean area within which the laying up takes place. Despite our finding that the differences did not always reach statistical significance (due to low background concentrations), there is a clear trend, from the small-sized particles (≥1.0μm) up to the largest sizes considered, including bacteria-carrying particles, that demonstrates the superiority of the horizontal flow system. The UDHF system offers a more robust solution than the UDDF system, provided that good work instructions are given and the height of the table and height of the plenum are properly adjusted.

摘要

背景

与单向向下气流(UDDF)系统相比,具有单向水平气流(UDHF)的器械消毒设备系统具有若干优势。这些优势基于系统的安装更加灵活、易于使用,无需对气流进行冷却,且循环所需的空气量更少,从而降低了能源消耗。

目的

本研究旨在确定在器械搁置过程中,空气(存在的颗粒和微生物)污染的预防方面,UDHF 系统是否与 UDDF 系统具有同等或更高的性能。

方法

针对几种静态设置和过程的动态模拟,确定了两种 UDHF 系统变体和两种 UDDF 系统变体的保护程度(DP)。除了确定多种粒径类别下的保护级别外,还在过程模拟过程中测量了集落形成单位(CFU)。

发现

当考虑最大保护(无颗粒存在)时,对于≥2.5μm 的颗粒,UDHF 系统的性能明显优于 UDDF 系统。当存在颗粒时,对于≥0.3μm 和≥0.5μm 的颗粒,系统之间没有显著差异。然而,对于代表细菌载粒的≥1.0μm 的颗粒,UDHF 系统的性能优于 UDDF 系统(DP)。在过程测量中,UDDF 系统在 64%的测量中未发现 CFU,而 UDHF 系统为 90%(P=0.012)。

结论

UDHF 系统提供了与 UDDF 系统同等或更高的保护,防止了正在进行搁置的清洁区域受到污染。尽管我们发现差异并不总是具有统计学意义(由于背景浓度较低),但从最小粒径(≥1.0μm)到包括细菌载粒在内的最大尺寸,都存在明显的趋势,表明水平流系统具有优越性。UDHF 系统提供了比 UDDF 系统更可靠的解决方案,前提是提供了良好的工作说明,并且正确调整了工作台的高度和静压箱的高度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验