Suppr超能文献

胰腺β细胞功能是有氧运动干预后血糖控制变化的更强预测因子,而不是胰岛素敏感性。

Pancreatic β-cell function is a stronger predictor of changes in glycemic control after an aerobic exercise intervention than insulin sensitivity.

机构信息

PhD, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Panum Institute 4.5.13, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.

出版信息

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Oct;98(10):4176-86. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2232. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Understanding intersubject variability in glycemic control following exercise training will help individualize treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to determine whether this variability is related to training-induced changes in insulin sensitivity or pancreatic β-cell function.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted an observational clinical study of 105 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance or type 2 diabetes.

INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Individual subject changes in fitness (VO2max), glycemia (glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, oral glucose tolerance test), insulin sensitivity (hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp), oral glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS), and disposition index (DI) were measured following 12 to 16 weeks of aerobic exercise training. Regression analyses were used to identify relationships between variables.

RESULTS

After training, 86% of subjects increased VO2max and lost weight. Glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test were reduced in 69%, 62%, and 68% of subjects, respectively, while insulin sensitivity improved in 90% of the participants. Changes in glycemic control were congruent with changes in GSIS such that 66% of subjects had a reduction in first-phase GSIS, and 46% had reduced second-phase GSIS. Training increased first- and second-phase DI in 83% and 74% of subjects. Training-induced changes in glycemic control were related to changes in GSIS (P < .05), but not insulin sensitivity or DI, and training-induced improvements in glycemic control were largest in subjects with greater pretraining GSIS.

CONCLUSIONS

Intersubject variability in restoring glycemic control following exercise is explained primarily by changes in insulin secretion. Thus, baseline and training-induced changes in β-cell function may be a key determinant of training-induced improvements in glycemic control.

摘要

背景

了解运动训练后血糖控制的个体差异将有助于实现个体化治疗。

目的

我们旨在确定这种变异性是否与胰岛素敏感性或胰岛β细胞功能的训练诱导变化有关。

设计、设置和参与者:我们对 105 例糖耐量受损或 2 型糖尿病患者进行了一项观察性临床研究。

干预措施和主要观察指标

在 12 至 16 周的有氧运动训练后,测量个体对健身(VO2max)、血糖(糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、口服葡萄糖耐量试验)、胰岛素敏感性(高胰岛素正葡萄糖钳夹)、口服葡萄糖刺激的胰岛素分泌(GSIS)和处置指数(DI)的个体变化。回归分析用于确定变量之间的关系。

结果

训练后,86%的患者增加了 VO2max 并减轻了体重。糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖和 2 小时口服葡萄糖耐量试验分别降低了 69%、62%和 68%,而 90%的参与者胰岛素敏感性提高。血糖控制的变化与 GSIS 的变化一致,即 66%的患者第一相 GSIS 减少,46%的患者第二相 GSIS 减少。83%和 74%的患者第一相和第二相 DI 增加。血糖控制的训练诱导变化与 GSIS 的变化有关(P<0.05),但与胰岛素敏感性或 DI 无关,并且在训练前 GSIS 较高的患者中,血糖控制的改善最大。

结论

运动后恢复血糖控制的个体差异主要由胰岛素分泌的变化解释。因此,β细胞功能的基线和训练诱导变化可能是训练诱导血糖控制改善的关键决定因素。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Tailoring Exercise Prescription for Effective Diabetes Glucose Management.为有效管理糖尿病血糖量身定制运动处方。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 25;110(Supplement_2):S118-S130. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae908.
2
The importance of exercise for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.运动对2型糖尿病血糖控制的重要性。
Am J Med Open. 2023 Jan 18;9:100031. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100031. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
β-Cell function during a high-fat meal in young versus old adults: role of exercise.年轻人和老年人在高脂餐期间的β细胞功能:运动的作用。
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2023 Aug 1;325(2):R164-R171. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00047.2023. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
Metabolic implications of pancreatic fat accumulation.胰腺脂肪堆积的代谢影响。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022 Jan;18(1):43-54. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00573-3. Epub 2021 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验