Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 15;8(8):e69912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069912. eCollection 2013.
Increasing active travel (primarily walking and cycling) has been widely advocated for reducing obesity levels and achieving other population health benefits. However, the strength of evidence underpinning this strategy is unclear. This study aimed to assess the evidence that active travel has significant health benefits.
The study design was a systematic review of (i) non-randomised and randomised controlled trials, and (ii) prospective observational studies examining either (a) the effects of interventions to promote active travel or (b) the association between active travel and health outcomes. Reports of studies were identified by searching 11 electronic databases, websites, reference lists and papers identified by experts in the field. Prospective observational and intervention studies measuring any health outcome of active travel in the general population were included. Studies of patient groups were excluded.
Twenty-four studies from 12 countries were included, of which six were studies conducted with children. Five studies evaluated active travel interventions. Nineteen were prospective cohort studies which did not evaluate the impact of a specific intervention. No studies were identified with obesity as an outcome in adults; one of five prospective cohort studies in children found an association between obesity and active travel. Small positive effects on other health outcomes were found in five intervention studies, but these were all at risk of selection bias. Modest benefits for other health outcomes were identified in five prospective studies. There is suggestive evidence that active travel may have a positive effect on diabetes prevention, which may be an important area for future research.
Active travel may have positive effects on health outcomes, but there is little robust evidence to date of the effectiveness of active transport interventions for reducing obesity. Future evaluations of such interventions should include an assessment of their impacts on obesity and other health outcomes.
越来越多的人提倡积极出行(主要是步行和骑车),以降低肥胖水平并实现其他人群健康获益。然而,这一策略的证据强度尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估积极出行具有显著健康获益的证据。
研究设计是对(i)非随机和随机对照试验,以及(ii)前瞻性观察研究进行系统评价,分别考察(a)促进积极出行的干预措施的效果,或(b)积极出行与健康结果之间的关联。通过搜索 11 个电子数据库、网站、专家确定的参考文献和论文来确定研究报告。纳入了在普通人群中测量任何积极出行健康结果的前瞻性观察和干预研究。排除了针对患者群体的研究。
从 12 个国家的 24 项研究中纳入了 24 项研究,其中 6 项是针对儿童的研究。5 项研究评估了积极出行干预措施。19 项为前瞻性队列研究,未评估特定干预措施的影响。没有研究将肥胖作为成年人的结果;5 项儿童前瞻性队列研究中有 1 项发现肥胖与积极出行之间存在关联。在 5 项干预研究中发现了对其他健康结果的微小积极影响,但这些研究都存在选择偏倚的风险。在 5 项前瞻性研究中发现了其他健康结果的适度获益。有迹象表明,积极出行可能对糖尿病预防有积极影响,这可能是未来研究的一个重要领域。
积极出行可能对健康结果有积极影响,但迄今为止,积极交通干预措施减少肥胖的有效性的证据很少且不够稳健。未来对这类干预措施的评估应包括评估其对肥胖和其他健康结果的影响。