• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

噪音污染会影响出行方式的选择吗?随机森林应用。

Does noise pollution influence modal choices? A random forest application.

作者信息

Calafiore Alessia, Tong Ki

机构信息

Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0325249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325249. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325249
PMID:40549773
Abstract

This work investigates the relationship between noise pollution and modal choices exploring and comparing two different urban contexts: Greater London and Brisbane. To achieve this, data on commuting flows by mode of transport and estimated noise pollution have been obtained and combined with measures to characterise the built environment which demonstrated to have an influence on modal choices. Random forest models have shown very good performances in solving classification problems to predict transport modes and allow the exploration of non-linear relationships between the predicted classes and explanatory variables. Two random forest models have been tuned, trained and tested to investigate the association between modal choices and contextual variables, including noise pollution, in Greater London and Brisbane. Results have shown that noise levels play a role in predicting modal choices in Greater London, while the characteristics of the built environment are more relevant when predicting modal choices in Brisbane. Furthermore, we find that walking and cycling, despite being both active travel modes, are influenced by very different factors, with cycling displaying patterns more similar to those characterising driving. Evidence showing the varying relationships between walking and cycling with contextual variables, e.g. noise levels, building and street density, presence of amenities can inform more targeted policies to encourage active travel.

摘要

本研究探讨并比较了大伦敦和布里斯班这两个不同城市环境中,噪声污染与出行方式选择之间的关系。为此,获取了按交通方式划分的通勤流量数据以及估计的噪声污染数据,并将其与用于描述建成环境特征的指标相结合,这些指标已被证明会对出行方式选择产生影响。随机森林模型在解决分类问题以预测交通方式方面表现出色,并能探索预测类别与解释变量之间的非线性关系。为研究大伦敦和布里斯班出行方式选择与包括噪声污染在内的环境变量之间的关联,对两个随机森林模型进行了调优、训练和测试。结果表明,噪声水平在预测大伦敦的出行方式选择时发挥作用,而在预测布里斯班的出行方式选择时,建成环境的特征更为重要。此外,我们发现步行和骑行虽然都是主动出行方式,但受不同因素影响,骑行显示出与驾车更为相似的模式。表明步行和骑行与环境变量(如噪声水平、建筑和街道密度、便利设施的存在)之间存在不同关系的证据,可为鼓励主动出行的更具针对性的政策提供参考。

相似文献

1
Does noise pollution influence modal choices? A random forest application.噪音污染会影响出行方式的选择吗?随机森林应用。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0325249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325249. eCollection 2025.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
3
The neighbourhood physical environment and active travel in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年人的邻里物理环境与主动出行:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Feb 6;14(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0471-5.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Comparison of cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.纤维素、改性纤维素和合成膜在终末期肾病患者血液透析中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003234. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003234.
7
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
8
Positioning for acute respiratory distress in hospitalised infants and children.急性呼吸窘迫患儿的体位摆放。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD003645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003645.pub4.
9
Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer.用于治疗癌症患者抑郁症的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 23;4(4):CD011006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011006.pub3.
10
Individual-level interventions to reduce personal exposure to outdoor air pollution and their effects on people with long-term respiratory conditions.个体层面的干预措施以减少个人接触室外空气污染及其对长期呼吸系统疾病患者的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 9;8(8):CD013441. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013441.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship amongst Noise Sensitivity, Burnout and Psychological Resilience in Community Workers.社区工作者的噪声敏感性、倦怠与心理弹性的关系。
Noise Health. 2023 Oct-Dec;25(119):264-269. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_40_23.
2
Benefits to Performance and Well-Being of Nature-Based Exercise: A Critical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于自然的运动对表现和健康的益处:一项关键的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Jan 4;56(1):62-77. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c05151. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
3
Environmental exposure during travel: A research review and suggestions forward.
旅行期间的环境暴露:研究综述及展望。
Health Place. 2021 Jul;70:102584. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102584. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
Geographic Ecological Momentary Assessment (GEMA) of environmental noise annoyance: the influence of activity context and the daily acoustic environment.地理生态瞬时评估(GEMA)在环境噪声烦恼中的应用:活动背景和日常声环境的影响。
Int J Health Geogr. 2020 Nov 23;19(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12942-020-00246-w.
5
Association between Active Travel to School and Depressive Symptoms among Early Adolescents.青少年早期主动步行或骑车上学与抑郁症状之间的关联。
Children (Basel). 2020 May 2;7(5):41. doi: 10.3390/children7050041.
6
Does Environmental Walkability Matter? The Role of Walkable Environment in Active Commuting.环境可步行性是否重要?可步行环境在积极通勤中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 15;17(4):1261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041261.
7
Effect of Traffic Noise and Relaxations Sounds on Pedestrian Walking Speed.交通噪声和放松声音对行人步行速度的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 14;15(4):752. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040752.
8
Correlates of Walking for Transportation or Recreation Purposes.出于交通或娱乐目的步行的相关因素。
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S77-S98. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s77.
9
The Association of Trip Distance With Walking To Reach Public Transit: Data from the California Household Travel Survey.出行距离与步行到达公共交通的相关性:来自加利福尼亚家庭出行调查的数据。
J Transp Health. 2016 Jun;3(2):154-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Sep 19.
10
Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review.主动出行的健康影响评估:一项系统综述。
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76:103-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 18.