Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio;, †Deartment of Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio;, ‡Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences;, §Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;, ‖Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada;, ¶Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, *Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Oct;8(10):1741-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11241012. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status and barriers to peritoneal dialysis eligibility and choice.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This study was a mixed methods parallel design study using quantitative and qualitative data from a prospective clinical database of ESRD patients. The eligibility and choice cohorts were assembled from consecutive incident chronic dialysis patients entering one of five renal programs in the province of Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2010. Socioeconomic status was measured as median household income and percentage of residents with at least a high school education using Statistics Canada dissemination area-level data. Multivariable models described the relationship between socioeconomic status and likelihood of peritoneal dialysis eligibility and choice. Barriers to peritoneal dialysis eligibility and choice were classified into qualitative categories using the thematic constant comparative approach.
The peritoneal dialysis eligibility and choice cohorts had 1314 and 857 patients, respectively; 65% of patients were deemed eligible for peritoneal dialysis, and 46% of eligible patients chose peritoneal dialysis. Socioeconomic status was not a significant predictor of peritoneal dialysis eligibility or choice in this study. Qualitative analyses identified 16 barriers to peritoneal dialysis choice. Patients in lower- versus higher-income Statistics Canada dissemination areas cited built environment or space barriers to peritoneal dialysis (4.6% versus 2.7%) and family or social support barriers (8.3% versus 3.5%) more frequently.
Peritoneal dialysis eligibility and choice were not associated with socioeconomic status. However, socioeconomic status may influence specific barriers to peritoneal dialysis choice. Additional studies to determine the effect of targeting interventions to specific barriers to peritoneal dialysis choice in low socioeconomic status patients on peritoneal dialysis use are needed.
本研究旨在评估邻里社会经济地位与腹膜透析资格和选择障碍之间的关系。
设计、设置、参与者和测量:这是一项混合方法平行设计研究,使用来自加拿大安大略省五个肾脏项目中连续进入慢性透析患者的前瞻性临床数据库中的定量和定性数据。资格和选择队列是从 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2010 年 12 月 31 日期间进入该省的连续发生的慢性透析患者中组建的。社会经济地位通过加拿大统计局传播区域级数据衡量,采用家庭中位数收入和至少受过高中教育的居民比例。多变量模型描述了社会经济地位与腹膜透析资格和选择的可能性之间的关系。使用主题恒定比较方法将腹膜透析资格和选择障碍分类为定性类别。
腹膜透析资格和选择队列分别有 1314 名和 857 名患者;65%的患者被认为有资格进行腹膜透析,而 46%的合格患者选择了腹膜透析。在这项研究中,社会经济地位并不是腹膜透析资格或选择的显著预测因素。定性分析确定了 16 种腹膜透析选择障碍。收入较低的加拿大统计局传播区患者比收入较高的患者更频繁地提到腹膜透析的建筑环境或空间障碍(4.6%比 2.7%)和家庭或社会支持障碍(8.3%比 3.5%)。
腹膜透析资格和选择与社会经济地位无关。然而,社会经济地位可能会影响腹膜透析选择的具体障碍。需要进一步研究确定针对低收入患者腹膜透析选择障碍的特定干预措施对腹膜透析使用的影响。