Wells Rebecca, Gifford Elizabeth J
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Health Policy and Management, 1104F McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill NC, US 27599-7411, Tel: (919) 966-7384.
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013 May 1;35(5):787-796. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.01.026.
States continue to experiment with ways of improving health and human service use by people with complex needs. Such efforts have often sought to increase individual and family control over services as well as to enhance coordination among providers. Paths to achieving these goals are not well understood. This study draws on two previously distinct conceptual frameworks to examine how 71 public schools implemented a team approach to increasing family and agency engagement for children at risk. Results from longitudinal data fit the core components expected to affect implementation and also indicated sustainability, but in ways distinctive to the initiative's public school settings. Accountability to the state appeared to be a major catalyst, yet in some respects also constrained local agencies from participating as intended. School inertia may have both undermined the program through some evaluation practices and gaps in administrative support, and supported integration into organizational routines and successful experimentation over time in increasing caregiver involvement. Family hesitation about sharing information with multiple agencies may also help explain why the goal of seamless coordination remains elusive.
各国继续探索改善有复杂需求人群的医疗保健和人类服务利用情况的方法。此类努力通常旨在增强个人和家庭对服务的掌控力,并加强服务提供者之间的协调。实现这些目标的途径尚未得到充分理解。本研究借鉴了两个此前截然不同的概念框架,以考察71所公立学校如何采用团队方法,来增强对处境危险儿童的家庭和机构参与度。纵向数据的结果符合预期会影响实施情况的核心要素,也表明了可持续性,但在该倡议的公立学校环境中表现出独特之处。对州政府负责似乎是一个主要催化剂,但在某些方面也限制了地方机构按预期参与。学校的惰性可能既通过一些评估做法和行政支持方面的差距破坏了该计划,也随着时间推移支持了该计划融入组织常规并成功进行实验,以增加照顾者的参与度。家庭对于与多个机构分享信息的犹豫,也可能有助于解释为何无缝协调的目标仍然难以实现。