Overgaard Morten, Sandberg Kristian
Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus University, Nørrebrogade 1A, Aarhus 8000, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Universitetsbyen 3, Building 1710, Aarhus 8000, Denmark.
Neurosci Conscious. 2021 Dec 15;2021(1):niab044. doi: 10.1093/nc/niab044. eCollection 2021.
Accurate insight into subjective experience is crucial for the science of consciousness. The Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS) was created in 2004 as a method for obtaining precise introspective reports for participants in research projects, and since then, the scale has become increasingly popular. This does not mean, of course, that no critiques have been voiced. Here, we briefly recapitulate our main thoughts on the intended PAS usage and the findings of the first decade, and we update this with the latest empirical and theoretical developments. We focus specifically on findings with relevance to whether consciousness is gradual or all-or-none phenomenon, to what should be considered conscious/unconscious, and to whether PAS is preferable to alternative measures of awareness. We respond in detail to some recent, selected articles.
对主观体验的准确洞察对于意识科学至关重要。感知觉知量表（PAS）于2004年创建，作为一种为研究项目参与者获取精确内省报告的方法，从那时起，该量表越来越受欢迎。当然，这并不意味着没有受到批评。在此，我们简要概括一下我们对PAS预期用途和第一个十年研究结果的主要看法，并结合最新的实证和理论进展进行更新。我们特别关注与意识是渐进现象还是全或无现象、什么应被视为有意识/无意识以及PAS是否比其他意识测量方法更可取相关的研究结果。我们详细回应了最近一些精选的文章。
