Chow D S, Qi J, Guo X, Miloushev V Z, Iwamoto F M, Bruce J N, Lassman A B, Schwartz L H, Lignelli A, Zhao B, Filippi C G
From the Departments of Radiology (D.S.C., J.Q., X.G., V.Z.M., L.H.S., A.L., B.Z., C.G.F.).
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Mar;35(3):498-503. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3724. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
A limitation in postoperative monitoring of patients with glioblastoma is the lack of objective measures to quantify residual and recurrent disease. Automated computer-assisted volumetric analysis of contrast-enhancing tissue represents a potential tool to aid the radiologist in following these patients. In this study, we hypothesize that computer-assisted volumetry will show increased precision and speed over conventional 1D and 2D techniques in assessing residual and/or recurrent tumor.
This retrospective study included patients with native glioblastomas with MR imaging performed at 24-48 hours following resection and 2-4 months postoperatively. 1D and 2D measurements were performed by 2 neuroradiologists with Certificates of Added Qualification. Volumetry was performed by using manual segmentation and computer-assisted volumetry, which combines region-based active contours and a level set approach. Tumor response was assessed by using established 1D, 2D, and volumetric standards. Manual and computer-assisted volumetry segmentation times were compared. Interobserver correlation was determined among 1D, 2D, and volumetric techniques.
Twenty-nine patients were analyzed. Discrepancy in disease status between 1D and 2D compared with computer-assisted volumetry was 10.3% (3/29) and 17.2% (5/29), respectively. The mean time for segmentation between manual and computer-assisted volumetry techniques was 9.7 minutes and <1 minute, respectively (P < .01). Interobserver correlation was highest for volumetric measurements (0.995; 95% CI, 0.990-0.997) compared with 1D (0.826; 95% CI, 0.695-0.904) and 2D (0.905; 95% CI, 0.828-0.948) measurements.
Computer-assisted volumetry provides a reproducible and faster volumetric assessment of enhancing tumor burden, which has implications for monitoring disease progression and quantification of tumor burden in treatment trials.
胶质母细胞瘤患者术后监测的一个局限在于缺乏量化残留和复发性疾病的客观方法。对增强组织进行自动计算机辅助容积分析是帮助放射科医生跟踪这些患者的一种潜在工具。在本研究中,我们假设在评估残留和/或复发性肿瘤时,计算机辅助容积分析将比传统的一维和二维技术显示出更高的精度和速度。
这项回顾性研究纳入了原发性胶质母细胞瘤患者,这些患者在切除术后24 - 48小时以及术后2 - 4个月进行了磁共振成像检查。由2名具有附加资格证书的神经放射科医生进行一维和二维测量。容积分析采用手动分割和计算机辅助容积分析,后者结合了基于区域的活动轮廓和水平集方法。使用既定的一维、二维和容积标准评估肿瘤反应。比较手动和计算机辅助容积分析的分割时间。确定一维、二维和容积技术之间的观察者间相关性。
分析了29例患者。与计算机辅助容积分析相比,一维和二维测量在疾病状态上的差异分别为10.3%(3/29)和17.2%(5/29)。手动和计算机辅助容积分析技术的平均分割时间分别为9.7分钟和不到1分钟(P < 0.01)。与一维测量(0.826;95% CI,0.695 - 0.904)和二维测量(0.905;95% CI,0.828 - 0.948)相比,容积测量的观察者间相关性最高(0.995;95% CI,0.990 - 0.997)。
计算机辅助容积分析为增强肿瘤负荷提供了可重复且更快的容积评估,这对监测疾病进展和在治疗试验中量化肿瘤负荷具有重要意义。