Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Nov;231(3):277-91. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3690-2. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
While haptic guidance can improve ongoing performance of a motor task, several studies have found that it ultimately impairs motor learning. However, some recent studies suggest that the haptic demonstration of optimal timing, rather than movement magnitude, enhances learning in subjects trained with haptic guidance. Timing of an action plays a crucial role in the proper accomplishment of many motor skills, such as hitting a moving object (discrete timing task) or learning a velocity profile (time-critical tracking task). The aim of the present study is to evaluate which feedback conditions-visual or haptic guidance-optimize learning of the discrete and continuous elements of a timing task. The experiment consisted in performing a fast tennis forehand stroke in a virtual environment. A tendon-based parallel robot connected to the end of a racket was used to apply haptic guidance during training. In two different experiments, we evaluated which feedback condition was more adequate for learning: (1) a time-dependent discrete task-learning to start a tennis stroke and (2) a tracking task-learning to follow a velocity profile. The effect that the task difficulty and subject's initial skill level have on the selection of the optimal training condition was further evaluated. Results showed that the training condition that maximizes learning of the discrete time-dependent motor task depends on the subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance was especially suitable for less-skilled subjects and in especially difficult discrete tasks, while visual feedback seems to benefit more skilled subjects. Additionally, haptic guidance seemed to promote learning in a time-critical tracking task, while visual feedback tended to deteriorate the performance independently of the task difficulty and subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance outperformed visual feedback, although additional studies are needed to further analyze the effect of other types of feedback visualization on motor learning of time-critical tasks.
虽然触觉引导可以提高正在进行的运动任务的表现,但已有多项研究发现,它最终会损害运动学习。然而,一些最近的研究表明,相对于运动幅度,触觉演示最佳时间可以增强在接受触觉引导训练的受试者中的学习。动作的时间在许多运动技能的正确完成中起着至关重要的作用,例如击打移动的物体(离散时间任务)或学习速度曲线(时间关键跟踪任务)。本研究的目的是评估哪种反馈条件(视觉或触觉引导)最能优化定时任务的离散和连续元素的学习。实验包括在虚拟环境中进行快速网球正手击球。连接到球拍末端的基于肌腱的并联机器人用于在训练过程中提供触觉引导。在两个不同的实验中,我们评估了哪种反馈条件更适合学习:(1)依赖时间的离散任务——学习开始网球击球,(2)跟踪任务——学习跟随速度曲线。进一步评估了任务难度和受试者初始技能水平对最佳训练条件选择的影响。结果表明,最大化离散时间依赖运动任务学习的训练条件取决于受试者的初始技能水平。触觉引导特别适合技能较低的受试者和特别困难的离散任务,而视觉反馈似乎更有益于技能较高的受试者。此外,触觉引导似乎促进了时间关键跟踪任务的学习,而视觉反馈则独立于任务难度和受试者的初始技能水平而降低性能。触觉引导优于视觉反馈,尽管需要进一步研究来分析其他类型的反馈可视化对时间关键任务运动学习的影响。